Vivek Jaiswal

कोशिश आखिरी सांस तक करनी चाहिए, मंजिल मिले या तजुर्बा चीजें दोनों ही नायाब हैं ।

[Roshan Rai @RoshanKrRaii]

This man has lost his marbles since the protest ended, if you see him anywhere, be sympathetic instead of angry and drop him to an asylum nearby to get him help.

[disha verma @di_shawarma]

🚨 The account @JaipurDialogues is posting pictures of girls (many are MINORS) from Delhi protests and encouraging followers to “find” & go after them

@DelhiPolice @Cyberdost @GoI_MeitY @MinistryWCD please urgently take note of cyber stalking, bullying, doxxing of girls (minors)

[gulvinder @rebelliousdogra]

I gave them all her details. Sorry friends. Sorry Yalina 🙏

[Tarun Gautam @TARUNspeakss]

Finally bhakts spotted at Jantar Mantar

[Ashok Kumar Pandey अशोक اشوک @Ashok_Kashmir]

अब तक झुका था वह
अंबानी और अदानी से
अबकी बार झुकना पड़ा
भारत की जवानी से

[gulvinder @rebelliousdogra]

Apni mummy ko pooch, tera bhi yehi hoga 🔥

[Abhijeet Dipke @abhijeet_dipke]

The government is rewarding corruption instead of ensuring accountability!

Last night, the Education Secretary was transferred. He was replaced by an IAS officer from the Animal Husbandry Department who has severe multi-crore corruption charges against him.

The entire crisis around paper leaks and NEET was about systemic corruption. Replacing one bureaucrat with another facing serious corruption allegations is a direct INSULT to young people across India.

Is this the "compromise" the government expects us to accept? This is not accountability. We will not stop until Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigns ✊

[Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) @internetfreedom]

Statement : The blocking of BitChat's code on GitHub is unconstitutional and authoritarian.

New Delhi, 24 July 2026

The Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) condemns the order issued by the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C), Ministry of Home Affairs, directing GitHub to remove the code repositories of BitChat.

The order, Notice No. 11072601011432, was issued at 11:16 pm on 23 July 2026 under Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Rule 3(1)(d) of the IT Rules, 2021. The order directs GitHub to disable access to three repositories, including the Android application and its release files, within three hours. It threatens the platform with loss of safe harbour and criminal prosecution. No copy was published by the Government of India. The public learnt of it from a post by @jack, whose team develops BitChat. Censorship in India now comes to light through disclosure by the censored.

Since 17 July 2026, the Ministry of Home Affairs has suspended mobile internet around Jantar Mantar as per public reports about five times, most recently within a 1.5 kilometre radius from 4 pm until midnight on 23 July. That radius takes in Janpath and parts of Connaught Place. Reports describe signal jammers at the protest site and people walking two kilometres before their phones work. Inside that zone a student separated from her group during a detention drive cannot send a message to say where she is. Thousands of students and young people have camped at Jantar Mantar since June, seeking accountability for examination irregularities. Permission for their march to Parliament was refused. Metro stations were shut and also internet connectivity has been blocked.

BitChat is an open source application built for exactly this situation. It passes messages from phone to phone over Bluetooth, without mobile networks or a central server. It is striking that the order does not identify a single unlawful message. It objects to what BitChat is. In its own words, the application is dangerous because it enables communication "even during network restrictions" and can "circumvent lawful restrictions" during "internet shutdowns". Hence, the government's objection is that citizens can speak to one another while it has switched the internet off.

The order is illegal on at least four grounds.

1. Section 79(3)(b) is not a blocking power. In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1, the Supreme Court read down the provision. Intermediaries may be required to act only on a court order, or a government notification confined to the grounds under Article 19(2) of the Constitution. Blocking is governed exclusively by Section 69A and the Blocking Rules, 2009, which require a hearing and reasons recorded in writing, subject to review. Directions issued under Section 79(3)(b), Rule 3(1)(d) and the Sahyog Portal evade these safeguards, and constitutional challenges to this parallel regime are pending before High Courts.

2. The reasons in the order are circular. The order asserts that the repositories contain "information which is prohibited under any law" without naming any such information, and rests on what the application is "capable of" enabling. Anticipated misuse of a communications tool is not a lawful basis to prohibit the tool. By this logic a telephone exchange could be sealed.

3. The order cites Section 43 of the IT Act, a civil compensation provision, alongside conspiracy and abetment offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, against a platform that hosts code.

4. A three hour deadline issued close to midnight forecloses legal assessment and recourse, and fails the proportionality standard in Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637.

The order also fails on its own terms as deleting a repository does not delete the application from any phone that carries it, and the mesh keeps functioning without servers. What the takedown actually prevents is scrutiny of the underlying code.

IFF demands that the Government of India:

1. Withdraw Notice No. 11072601011432 dated 23 July 2026 issued to GitHub.
2. Publish every takedown direction issued under Section 79(3)(b), Rule 3(1)(d) and the Sahyog Portal, with the reasons recorded for each.
3. Restore full connectivity around Jantar Mantar, publish all suspension orders, and disclose the legal authority for the deployment of jammers.

We stand with the developers and the young protesters whose speech this order seeks to silence.

[खुरपेंच Satire @Khurpench_]

यही तो खूबसूरती है अमृतकाल की !

[Akhilesh Yadav @yadavakhilesh]

रोटी मत छीनो!

(नोटबंदी के बाद फूड बंदी)

#Notebandi_to_Foodbandi

[Worlds Affairs @worlds_affairs]

Or Ayushman card k payment Modi ji apni pocket se kar rhe hai?

Ye paise hmare tax ke hai

[Rahul Gandhi @RahulGandhi]

Mr. Modi, our students are demanding Dharmendra Pradhan’s resignation.

Don’t insult their intelligence with this pathetic midnight video.

1. Sack Pradhan.
2. Punish those who beat students.
3. ⁠Apologise

[Vivek Jaiswal @jaiswalvk]

@kapsology #boycottzoho too

[Ashok Kumar Pandey अशोक اشوک @Ashok_Kashmir]

चले भी मत जाना
बहुत गुस्से में हैं छात्र

[Prem Panicker @prempanicker]

One thing is clear: the habit of sucking up to power and kissing ass is a hard one to break.

[Vivek Jaiswal @jaiswalvk]

#Boycottzoho

[Sridhar Vembu @svembu]

One thing is clear: the Delhi protesters want to plunge India into chaos, and stop the nation's progress. We must defeat this malicious agenda, which is aided and abetted by powers that want to destroy India.

We have a vibrant democracy and elections are the proper way to express our collective judgment.

[Dr Nimo Yadav 2.0 @DrNimoYadav]

Yeh toh kuch bhi nahi hai, Vadnagar mein chai bechne wala toh seedha Pradhan Mantri hi ban gaya.

[sanjoy ghose @advsanjoy]

😂😂😂😂😂

[Srini R @SriniR_2025]

Only slaves stand by kings. Citizens demand accountability from an elected Govt.

[Helle Lyng @HelleLyngSvends]

Maybe a dumb question, but why is a so-called serious news outlets using hashtags as DeepStateDipke & CJPGoons?

It is a clear violation of press ethics to use that sort of language on something you arguably should cover objectively.