Let’s see. In Genesis 12.2, God says to Abraham:
“Ve’escha le’goi gadol.”
Which means:
“I will make you a great nation.”
That’s what it says in the Hebrew, as anyone who knows a little Scripture can tell you.
Goi means nation.
“Goi gadol” means “a great nation.”
But Candace believes that “goi” means “cattle.” She thinks “goi gadol” means “great cattle.”
In other words, she thinks that in Genesis 12.2, God says to Abraham:
“I will make you a great cattle.”
She thinks God promised Abraham that he would become livestock.
I don’t think Candace is defending a reasonable position here.
The Supreme Court's ruling on birthright citizenship is a legal abomination. But it's just more evidence that Congress and multiple presidents, in abdicating their duty on immigration for decades, have screwed America irredeemably. We're going live now:
https://t.co/4lDLbY22lT
James Carville on Antisemitic Mamdani endorsement @DarializaforNY being a red line that cannot be crossed.
Very worth listening to. We need more people drawing a red line at genocidal anti-semites calling for Israel's annihilation.
@piersmorgan Again & again on the false claim that journalists are not allowed into Gaza because Israel is hiding something. Ignoring the indisputable fact that dozens of local journalists are already in Gaza reporting live daily for global outlets like AP, AFP, WP. https://t.co/yGeHxoPewb
The logline & trailer for Jonathan Majors' new film for The Daily Wire has been revealed:
“When radical Islamic terrorists hijack a liberal college’s pro-Palestine encampment to enforce Sharia law on students, a ragtag band of red-blooded students, a security guard tired of ‘Uncle Tom’ smears & a Delta Force vet must arm up to save their clueless peers & keep America from surrendering to the enemy on its own soil.”
I have a problem with the fact that the woman who just won her primary in New York and will be a member of Congress went to a rally on October 8th celebrating the slaughter of Jews. There are a lot of my jewish friends who have a problem with that. This isn't hard.
Who’s crashing out, and why? The whole private comms ecosystem and corp infra the WH uses via PublicSquare and Alex whatshisname’s PSQ Impact has exposure to roughly $10 billion non-US capital through PSQ’s institutional investor Alyeska Cayman feeder and its 434 opaque non-US beneficiaries.
The fact that Omeed Malik is a former director with a stake in PSQ and that his Colombier Aquisition sponsored the SPAC which took PSQ public, coupled with the fact pattern of his being an early investor in Carlson’s media venture, his 1789 Capital partnership with Don Jr among other ventures, as well as Don Jr’s own presence on the board of PSQ plus whopping payouts of over half a mil for consulting last year alone — I believe all of that opens up a legitimate line of inquiry here.
What is the honest question here? Is the White House’s outside communications vendor exposed to opaque foreign capital, and more importantly does it matter or is it completely trivial, because, so what, it’s just how that business works?
After all, if a hedge fund cannot have oversees investments and holdings and cannot maintain its non-US investor’s privacy just because it is invested in a White House vendor’s comms service provider — what Qatari wants to live in that world? Come now, be reasonable.
If the market is any indicator, PSQH’s 8 week crash out from $0.85 to today’s intraday low of $0.400 as of this writing, down from $0.449 at today’s high — is, let’s just say, interesting.
Okay, let’s try to unpack the fact pattern properly and identify the flags, IF ANY, it legitimately raises.
1) PublicSquare’s institutional investor, Anand Parehk’s Alyeska hedge fund, holds an 8.89% stake according to PSQ’s June 11 proxy filing (sched 14a attacked in qt below).
2) Its LP base includes over $10bn of non-US capital across 434 beneficial owners according to Alyeska’s own SEC filings, held behind a Cayman feeder whose investors are not publicly identifiable. That number is derived from their own disclosures that 25% of their $41.68 bn RAUM is non-US person capital.
3) PSQ was brought public by an SPAC that was sponsored by Omeed Malik’s Colombier Aquisitions, see: https://t.co/BSDLod1ZcG.
4) In fact, Malik is a former director at PSQ via Omeed Malik Advisors LLC which took on stakes in November 2023: https://t.co/jw0wN85R6f
5) Don Jr. joined Malik’s 1789 Capital Don Jr. as a partner in 2024. In fact, Don Jr. is not only a partner in Malik’s fund but a recurring participant across Malik’s SPAC and venture pipeline. PSQ is just one node in a repeated structure that has been widely reported. For instance, Colombier Acquisition Corp. III a SPAC backed by Malik, Chamath Palihapitiya, and Don Jr., filed for a $260M IPO. GrabAGun, The Enhanced Games, and “Executive Branch” are other Malik-Don Jr. et al ventures.
6) Something that stands out like a bit of a sore thumb here is that Alex whatshisface, the CEO of PSQ Impact and PSQ stakeholder, did his honeymoon in the Al Khayyat Maldive’s resort which has prompted questions from longtime conservative Trump supporters like Evi Kokalari who want to know if Alex paid for the trip or if it was it gifted to him, and if so by whom and why (see: https://t.co/WZD5ybzzdY)
7) Beyond that, there is an increasingly well-documented and rather massive fact pattern of Qatari influence and fund flows into the US and admin officiates that has been receiving coverage ad nauseum from US conservative and pro-Israel corners.
So, what we have is exposure, capability, and opacity, and the question is, does it rise to warranting a legitimate inquiry into coordination and direction? On balance, this analysts thinks it’s prolly nuthin. Was just bored and wanted to rummage SEC filings. Nevermind. I’m sure it’s fine. It’s all fine.
There are discriminators that would however likely move this line of inquiry up toward a real CI threshold, or down to just run of the mill offshore feeders work: Alyeska’s PSQH position behavior over time, specifically it's recent 5.56% to 8.89% stake climb and what’s in it, and whether any named foreign entity surfaces in the Colombier PIPE or a public LP disclosure, which I will probably not look into, because why bother. It’s fine. 🫠
I do have a nagging qu’n tho. For a market-neutral quant fund, every position has to earn its place by fitting Alyeska’s model — expected alpha, hedgeable risk, liquidity, the works.
1) Alyeska’s Aug 14 2025 13G showed a 2,354,239 shares position equaling 5.56% stake in PSQ. It was trading on NYSE at right around $2.75 then.
2) Alyeska’s 13G/A, filed Feb 17 this year, showed a jump to 4,424,571 shares logged at 9.90%. That Friday, Feb 14, PSQH was trading at $3.60-ish.
3) Now PSQ’s proxy filing (its sched 14 a) on June 11 shows the jump to 4,424,571 shares is 8.89% — that’s due to dilution.
The interesting part is what happened in between. A few weeks before that Christmas, PSQ got a fat pump and dump. On Monday Dec 02 it closed around $2.00, and opened Tuesday at $3.60 catapulting by mid-day's trading to $7.70. Since then it's done nothing but nose dive.
Alyeska is a $41.68 bn RAUM fund. Why is it doubling its position in this small cap, even as PSQ diluted? Especially when the value of its PSQ position is barely a rounding error in Alyeska’s portfolio?
Why does Alyeska need to double down on a highly political line item that only invites eyeballs and eyebrows? And is the long a naked directional position, one leg of a market neutral arb, did it cash out the $7.70 high and re-enter for the same $ amount at twice the shares?
There’s an Alyeska 13G on Aligos Therapeutics (CUSIP 01626L105) with similar Alyeska joint-filing structure. Alyeska appears to routinely file passive 13Gs across small-mid biotech and SPAC positions as ordinary book behavior. Crossing 5% in a small name in and of itself is normal for this fund but it doesn’t resolve PSQ specifically, because the anomaly isn’t merely the 5% cross; it’s the doubling down into what is over all a diluting drawdown.
The foreign vector concern, to be serious about all of this, is not showing as an anomaly on what is outlined here alone: Alyeska has pretty standard offshore fund structures. Everything else is known and being interrogated publicly: the Malik-Don Jr. and Tucker Carlson circuit is common knowledge, board seats and consulting arrangements are public filings and at least in principle routine arrangements.
The better qu’n that does raise interest is: Why is a serious market-neutral hedge fund with over fourty billion in assets under management and 434 opaque non-US beneficiaries doubling down into a diluting, crashing, politically radioactive microcap, that is positionally meaningless by relative value?
The political exposure is obvious and that’s odd enough to be worth a raised eyebrow — but it’s not proof of anything.
Go figure. Maybe I’ll keep digging.
@megynkelly@alexbruesewitz If by "doing the Lord’s work" you mean Alex's company takes on paid campaigns ranging from shilling for AI data centers to reclassifying marijuana - just to name two of the dozens (or hundreds) - then yeah, absolutely, he’s a godsend 😂
I used to have @TheFive on in the background before watching @BretBaier. The fact is @JessicaTarlov is the ONLY one being honest on the show. @JesseBWatters is simply on the gaslight express. It’s like the twilight zone where on the topic of Iran, Jessica is the only honest one.
“For him, this may be a game on X: a series of online fights that are now intentionally being escalated further ("the attack dogs are unleashed"). For us Iranians, it is about the lives of our family and friends in Iran, who live under one of the most brutal regimes of our time. That's why I care, and that's why I speak up. I share that concern with millions of Iranians around the world. Bruesewitz's life, on the other hand, will not be affected by the lifeline that Vance is throwing to the regime at all.”
Alex is the info op -- a disgusting sellout tool to the highest bidder. He'll stop at nothing to destroy the party until all that's left is rump Vance-Tucker wing that can win no election.