@StellarFox16 Also stupid, you @StellarFox16 in particular have been crashing out about men in women’s spaces for the past two weeks. Now you want to use this video to say men don’t take interest in women’s interests? Are you dumb?
@StellarFox16 How stupid. How many women say “I know sexuality isn’t a choice because who would choose to be attracted to men.” Or “unfortunately, I’m straight.”
@Phil_flygerian@UrbanTake_001 Majority of the fighters are men. The men as a group are responsible for the destruction and war. Simple. They start them and fight them, especially in places where populations of women and children exist. Women and children don’t have the protection or agency in war which makes
@Phil_flygerian@UrbanTake_001 Are you saying women in children in a war zone are safer than the soldiers in the same war zone? On the same battlefields?
@Phil_flygerian@UrbanTake_001 No I didn’t. I said women and children are disproportionately effected, not ONLY women and children are effected. You gotta learn to read better bro.
@Phil_flygerian@UrbanTake_001 Men as a group in a war zone have a better chance at survival because they have equipment to protect, defend, and attack the enemy. Women and children as groups don’t. They are on the front lines but are still in the crossfire. If you still dont understand then I can’t help you.
@Phil_flygerian@UrbanTake_001 I didn’t say the men not fighting are affected less. I they’re not affected disproportionately. Those words mean two different things.
When are in a war zone the people in amor with weapons have a higher chance of survival than the people ALSO in the war zone without them.
@Phil_flygerian@UrbanTake_001 Then you’d understand that means women and children who aren’t fighting nor have weapons or protection like amor or armored vehicles would die quicker and many more of them. Thats why it’s disproportionately affected women and children