PETER THIEL CALLED IT.
The Antichrist wouldn’t build the doomsday machine.
This clip aged terrifyingly well.
Peter Thiel predicted in June, 26, 2025 exactly what is happening right now with Anthropic, Coxon and the AI-safety landscape.
“The way the Antichrist would take over the world is you talk about Armageddon non-stop, you talk about existential risk non-stop.”
The 'Antichrist' wouldn’t seize power by creating an AI apocalypse, but by CONVINCING everyone that the apocalypse was coming and then offering safety in exchange for CONTROL.
A must watch.
The gun is the most misunderstood object in Western civilization. Not a weapon. A technology. The technology that made the idea of equality physically real.
1. The longbow democratized warfare – a peasant could kill a knight with a stick and a string, and Agincourt proved it. The gun completed the process. The armored warrior class whose claim to social dominance rested on physical superiority became obsolete. The aristocratic monopoly on violence ended not with a philosophy but with a mechanism. The gun is the physical enforcement of the idea that all men are created equal. Which is why the American founders put it in the second amendment – not as an afterthought, but as the guarantee of everything else.
2. The Roman citizen had the right to bear arms. The Greek citizen had it. The English yeoman had it. The Swiss canton built its entire civilization on it. The disarming of the population has always been, in every civilization, in every century, the first act of the government that intends to stop being answerable to that population. Show me a disarmed population and I will show you a population that lost something else shortly after.
3. The Second Amendment is not about hunting. It is not about sport. It is about the relationship between the armed citizen and the state – the explicit constitutional acknowledgment that the citizen’s right to defend himself, his family, and his civilization against any threat, including the government itself, is not granted by the state and cannot be revoked by it. Power flows upward from the armed citizen, not downward from the armed state.
4. The gun defends the family. The woman alone with her children. The farmer on the edge of civilization. The shopkeeper in the neighborhood the police no longer patrol. The gun is the equalizer – the technology that makes the physical difference between a large man and a small woman irrelevant. Every argument for disarmament is, at its core, an argument that the state will protect you better than you can protect yourself. The evidence for this proposition is not encouraging.
5. In Europe, the disarmament is now nearly complete – and it happened precisely as the state’s ability and willingness to protect its citizens began to decline. The timing is not coincidental. A population that cannot defend itself must trust the state to defend it – which is a population that cannot effectively question whether the state is doing so. The dependency is the design.
6. The gun is a civilizational technology in the deepest sense: it requires responsibility, judgment, and the willingness to accept the consequences of your decisions. You cannot outsource it. You cannot have a committee fire it. It is the most anti-bureaucratic object ever invented – a direct, personal, consequential instrument that puts the full weight of the decision on the individual holding it. Which is precisely why the administrative state finds it intolerable. Not because it is dangerous. Because it is sovereign.
7. The family that can defend itself does not depend on the state for its most fundamental security. The civilization that can defend itself has not yet outsourced its survival to an institution that will negotiate the terms of that survival on its own behalf. The gun determines who controls violence – and therefore who controls everything that violence can threaten. Which is everything. The Sobieski who rode down the hill had a sword and sixty thousand horsemen. The equivalent today is the armed citizen who understands what he is defending and why. Every civilization that forgot this discovered it the hard way. The ones that remembered it are still here.
The truth is that lonely people don't evaluate political arguments on their merits, but on whether accepting them produces belonging.
When a large enough portion of a population is atomized, the movement that offers the strongest sense of identity wins. Not the one with the best ideas, the most historically grounded arguments, or the most defensible policies.
Arendt offered no political program. Her antidote? The reconstruction of voluntary bonds: real people, real places, real shared action in a common world.
On page twenty-six of “The Billionaire Tax” proposal in California, it explains how the state legislature can convert from a Billionaire Tax to an Everyone Tax without voter approval.
They can also adjust the tax to be a yearly tax, not just one time…again, without your approval.
Intelligence test for you: if this was meant to just target Billionaires, why did they write this in?
Holy COW! This San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Captain alleges that Pakistanis who have never even been in the US are voting in California elections... from Pakistan.
According to the captain, voting records indicate individuals outside the country, specifically in Pakistan, can participate in the CA elections.
If this is true... talk about a national security threat! No wonder why California wants to hide voter information from the feds!
REPOST for exposure!
I want you to listen to me when I tell you the EU Digital Censorship Act was co-designed, in the United States, by Democrats and NeverTrump Republicans, explicitly as a legal crowbar to force global censorship of populist movements and governments on both sides of the Atlantic.
BREAKING: Congress is considering stripping sovereign immunity of EU censorship officials, prohibiting social media from enforcing censorship orders, and enabling private lawsuits against foreign entities, says @Jim_Jordan echoing remarks made by @UnderSecPD and @DarrellIssa
Dear Republican Presidential Nominee For The 2028 Election: I Am Here From The Future To Tell You Why You Just Got Crushed (So You Can Go Back In Time, Fix Your Mistake In 2026, And Win).
At some point, you have to stop acting like fraud is some weird glitch in the welfare machine.
Fraud isn’t the exception, it’s the predictable outcome of a system that takes money by force and disperses it through bureaucracies. Don't act confused when opportunists show up to feed.
When you build an entire economy around “other people’s money,” you’re not creating compassion, you’re creating incentives for corruption.
At some point, a rational person has to stop pretending this scam can be salvaged. Once you finally recognize the fraud that’s always been baked into the welfare state, the answer isn’t to reshuffle stolen money and keep the con alive just because you think someone “needs it.”
The only real solution is complete and total abolition of the federal welfare state. This isn’t a system that can be “reformed.” It’s broken by design, immoral at its core, and deserves to be dismantled.... not managed.