Janice Bootherstone

Ex nurse, ex teacher, now thankfully retired. Finally found a job I can do without being constantly inspected and berated. Except now I’m a school Governor!

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

Islamic preacher in Germany: “You can’t stone a woman for adultery in Germany, but when we establish an Islamic state here, stoning will be legally fully allowed under Sharia.”

This culture is mental illness!

[Rafe Heydel-Mankoo @RafHM]

The Bank of England DELIBERATELY FIXED the fake "public vote" to remove ALL historical figures from bank notes & replace them with nature images

Freedom of Information requests by the Telegraph reveal the decision to remove historical figures was based on a "focus group" of a mere 119 people

The Bank LIED because it previously claimed the decision was based on a "public vote".

In truth, however, even this vote was FIXED. Instead of having HISTORY v NATURE, the bank deliberately split the "history" category into 3 sections: historical events, historical figures, architecture & landmarks.

That was the only way that "nature" could win.

However, of course bank notes always combine at least two of those history categories. For example: Churchill & Parliament or Wellington & Waterloo.

The Bank's actions are indefensible and questions should be asked in the House.

The Bank of England has clearly been captured by progressive woke ideology. A visit to the Bank of England with its permanent exhibition on slavery makes that clear

This is part of the wider war on British history. It's an attempt to create a NEW BRITAIN, based on ridiculous myths that "Diversity Built Britain" and that Britain has always been multicultural.

Remember: the Bank of England issued a 50p coin (held aloft by Rishi Sunak) which was imprinted with the nonsensical statement: "Diversity Built Britain"

Anyone who lived behind the Iron Curtain will find all of this eerily and scarily familiar.

The pulling down of statues, the renaming of streets and schools, the rewriting of history, denigrating heroes, changing bank notes etc....these were all tactics of the communists.

Severing the connection between a people and their history is the best way to demoralise a society and prepare them for the imposition of new myths.

Me on @GBNews:

[Critica Climatica Alias Fortunato Nardelli @climacritic]

Questa foto si intitola "La scomparsa della donna".
E' opera della fotografa yemenita Boushra Almutawakel.

[Artur Nadolny @ArturNadol7566]

SHE REPORTED CHILD ABUSE 181 TIMES. BRITAIN SAID NOT NOW, THANKS.

Sara Rowbotham was an NHS sexual health coordinator in Rochdale. Between 2005 and 2011 she filed 181 detailed referrals to Greater Manchester Police and social services.

Each one named victims. Each one described systematic rape and trafficking of girls as young as 11. Each one went nowhere.

She was not ignored because the evidence was weak. She was ignored because the evidence was inconvenient.

Authorities labelled her not credible. Her team was dismissed. The official reason given for inaction was community cohesion.

Read that again.

Community cohesion. While children were being passed between men like property, the priority was keeping things quiet.

She was made redundant in 2014.

A 2024 independent review confirmed every referral she filed was credible, substantive and appropriately communicated. The same review identified 96 men still considered an active risk to children. Still out there. In 2024. Because the original response scraped only the surface and called it a job done.

Five police officers refused to cooperate with the review. They were not charged. They were not recalled. They retired on pensions.

Sara Rowbotham got an MBE.

The system that failed 181 times got a press release about lessons learned.

If this does not alarm you, you have not understood it yet.

@BBC @guardian @AndyBurnhamGM

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

HEARTBREAKING: Her 10-month-old baby was cut in half with a knife in front of her, her husband shot dead, and she watched them split her second child's skull with a machete. They also cut off one of her hands.

This is life for Christians in Nigeria. The media remains silent.

[Dr. Insensitive Jerk @DrInsensitive]

This actually happened. It's not an X hoax.

100,000 is a huge number, and Grok says the true number is thought to be as high as one million.

The USA was probably their top destination.

On Dec 10, 2025, India seized 100,000 forged diplomas from 22 universities. The Indian government know the names of the fake degree holders. Many were medical degrees, some were nursing or engineering.

The US State Department must demand the names of all fake Indian degree holders.

Then they must be expelled from the USA, or imprisoned.

If India won't provide the list, then we must expel all Indians who were admitted or hired on the basis of Indian credentials.

If you disagree, then you want to children to die from preventable medical errors or collapsing bridges.

[Clayton Walker @Channel6ixNEWS]

Police in India arrested 11 people who issued over 100k fake university degrees in medicine, & engineering

You're "Premiere talent" is here working as doctors on fraudulent degrees

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

A lot of people have struggled to believe me when I say that the Australian Human Rights Commission is giving pregnancy protections in law to men who claim to be woman, because it’s so stupid it’s hard to believe anyone would say it.

Enjoy:

[esskayultra @esskayultra]

Schrodinger's Trans:
Phenomenon in which women's spaces, sports, language, etc are so irrelevant and unimportant that women shouldn't mind giving them up while simultaneously being so consequential and necessary that men who call themselves women will die if they can't have them.

[Stuart Andrew @StuartAndrew]

The Health Secretary is responsible for women’s healthcare, maternity services, breast cancer screening, female hospital wards and single-sex spaces for patients and staff.

These are serious issues that shape care and safeguarding across the NHS.

He should be able to define a woman without implying it is up for debate.

[Women o' Scotland @WomenOScotland]

Starmer’s just appointed James Murray as the new Health Secretary the man now running the entire NHS.
And this is how he defines a woman when a actual woman challenges him:
Woman: “Do you think it’s a bit strange that you’re a man telling me, a woman, what a woman is?”
Murray: “I think a woman is an adult female and a trans woman.”
Woman: “An adult female… and an adult male?”
Murray: “You and I disagree on this.”
Let that sink in.
The bloke in charge of women’s wards, maternity care, single-sex spaces, rape crisis services, and NHS safeguarding can’t or won’t admit that women are adult human females. Full stop.
This isn’t nuance. It’s dangerous ideological capture at the highest level of healthcare. How the hell is he going to protect women’s rights and safety when he thinks biological males can be women?
This appointment is a disgrace. Women’s health and dignity are not up for debate or “disagreement.”
We’re watching you, Secretary Murray. Closely.

[Alba VeeDub KPSS @AlbaVeeDub]

@ScotNational Holly Bruce screamed abuse at women queuing to enter a conference on women’s issues.

I was there. That’s frankly all I need to know.

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

How? If illegal in the uk! How? 😡

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

🤡 WTAF … The DWP has confirmed that taxpayers have funded an increase in benefits for ‘additional spouses’ in ‘polygamous marriages’

… an increase of 4.8% boost to their benefits from April, for husbands with multiple wives.

Even though Polygamy is ILLEGAL in the UK 🤡

[Aja ♀️🇬🇧 @AjaTheEmpress]

Two clear examples where face coverings should absolutely be banned ASAP:

In court — I’m sorry, but you don’t have a right to anonymity. If this is allowed, then all criminals should be able to wear balaclavas in court.

When standing for election — I’m sorry, but who on earth is under that? How can anyone be sure the person they’re voting for is actually the one behind it?

[J Stewart @triffic_stuff_]

🚨EPIC BETRAYAL: LABOUR MP SAYS BRITS MUST JUST SUFFER TO ACCOMMODATE MORE MIGRANTS! 😡

York MP Rachael Maskell Declares NHS Delays, Overcrowded Schools & Higher Taxes Are “Worth It” While Labour Floods Communities

“We must keep going until we really are at saturation point. What does it matter if we have to wait another week for a hospital visit, or if our class sizes are bigger, if we have to pay more into the system? Surely it is worth it.” 🤬

This is naked, sneering contempt from Rachael Maskell for the British people of York she pretends to serve.

She stands there in her own city and openly declares that longer NHS queues, crumbling school standards, and squeezed wallets for hardworking families are a price worth paying so Labour can keep cramming migrants into our communities until everything snaps.

And this isn't just one rogue MP, this is the rotten core of Keir Starmer's Labour Party. This is who they are, they despise working-class concerns. Complain and you’re instantly smeared as “racist” or “far-right”.

Every single one of them, from Starmer down to Maskell, shows zero care for the people they claim to represent.

This is why Britain is boiling with rage. This is why trust is gone. This is why Labour under Starmer is poison for ordinary Brits.

Rachael Maskell doesn't represent York.

Keir Starmer's Labour doesn't represent Britain.

They represent its deliberate downfall.

[The Rabbit Hole @TheRabbitHole]

@elonmusk Thomas Sowell on Multiculturalism

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

True

[Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC @BishopDewar]

As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows:

To:
His Majesty, Charles III,
King of the United Kingdom and the Realms,
Supreme Governor of the Church of England,
Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith.

Your Majesty,

I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled.

Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment.

For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith.

The laws of this land were shaped by it.
The liberties of our people were nurtured by it.
The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it.

From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her.

Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them.

Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age.

Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel.

Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation.

What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state.

It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis.

The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge.

They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation.

Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?”

They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled.

Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law.

Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm.

History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ.

That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity.

And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault.

If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed.

The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long.

Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced.

For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender.

You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours.

Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means.

They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them.

For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it.

Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted.

May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown.

Yours faithfully,

Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC
Missionary Bishop
Diocese of Providence
Confessing Anglican Church

@PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese

[Scotland’s Story @80_mcswan]

If you want Baroness Michelle Mone removed from the House of Lords and to repay the £136,000,000 owed to taxpayers, please RT!