Percy05 🐶😍

Shabana Mahmood Called George Floyd's Death An Unspeakable Outrage. She Called Henry Nowak's A Political Grandstanding Opportunity. On June 4th 2020, four days after George Floyd died in Minneapolis, Shabana Mahmood wrote to her constituents. She described his death as an unspeakable outrage. She shared the anger of the Black Lives Matter movement. She condemned Donald Trump in the strongest possible terms. She pledged to ensure Black voices are heard at the heart of our democracy. She signed it with a Black Lives Matter hashtag. This week Shabana Mahmood stood at the despatch box and told the House of Commons there must be no two tier policing. She said the police have a sacred duty to act without fear or favour. She warned that anyone using Henry Nowak's murder to stoke division should be rejected. Henry Nowak died on December 3rd 2025. Mahmood said nothing for days. The Commons Speaker had to order the government to make a statement. When she finally spoke she described the national outcry as political grandstanding and accused those naming the problem of stoking division. Four days after George Floyd died she had already written to her constituents. Four days after Henry Nowak's killer was convicted she had to be ordered to speak by the Speaker of the House. The letter she wrote in 2020 is worth reading carefully because it is the most precise document available for understanding what happened this week. She writes that her work deeply reflects the cause for social and racial justice. She writes that she will carry on working to ensure Black voices are heard at the heart of our democracy. She writes that she wants her work to continue to be reflective of black and ethnic minority experiences in Birmingham. Not all voices. Black voices. Not all experiences. Black and ethnic minority experiences. That is the Home Secretary who told Parliament this week there must be no two tier policing. Her own letter is a precise description of two tier political engagement. One standard applied to George Floyd. A different standard applied to Henry Nowak. The progressive institutional machinery was operational within hours of Floyd's death. The hashtag was ready. The language was ready. The political network was ready. Mahmood's letter was part of that machinery. It was produced within four days because the machinery runs automatically when the case fits the framework. Black Lives Matter had been founded in 2013. By 2020 it had dozens of local chapters, a global network, corporate donors worth hundreds of millions of dollars and political allies embedded across every major Western government. When Floyd died every node of that network activated simultaneously. Mahmood's letter was one activation among millions. Henry Nowak's case does not fit the framework. His killer used the progressive framework as the murder weapon. His case does not vindicate the ideology of anti-racism training. It exposes it. And the Home Secretary whose entire political career has been built around that ideology found herself at the despatch box this week condemning its most visible consequence while declining to name its cause. She wrote in 2020 that she would ensure Black voices are heard at the heart of our democracy. She has kept that promise. The question Henry Nowak's family is entitled to ask is which voices were heard at the heart of the institutions that trained the officers who handcuffed their son. The Hampshire Race Action Plan. The NPCC guidance. The College of Policing practice bank. The Metropolitan Police neutrality myth. All of it built by the same political framework Mahmood has spent her career advancing. There must be no two tier policing. She is right. The letter she wrote in 2020 explains precisely why there is.

JChimirie66677's tweet photo. Shabana Mahmood Called George Floyd's Death An Unspeakable Outrage. She Called Henry Nowak's A Political Grandstanding Opportunity.

On June 4th 2020, four days after George Floyd died in Minneapolis, Shabana Mahmood wrote to her constituents. She described his death as an unspeakable outrage. She shared the anger of the Black Lives Matter movement. She condemned Donald Trump in the strongest possible terms. She pledged to ensure Black voices are heard at the heart of our democracy. She signed it with a Black Lives Matter hashtag.

This week Shabana Mahmood stood at the despatch box and told the House of Commons there must be no two tier policing. She said the police have a sacred duty to act without fear or favour. She warned that anyone using Henry Nowak's murder to stoke division should be rejected.

Henry Nowak died on December 3rd 2025. Mahmood said nothing for days. The Commons Speaker had to order the government to make a statement. When she finally spoke she described the national outcry as political grandstanding and accused those naming the problem of stoking division.

Four days after George Floyd died she had already written to her constituents. Four days after Henry Nowak's killer was convicted she had to be ordered to speak by the Speaker of the House.

The letter she wrote in 2020 is worth reading carefully because it is the most precise document available for understanding what happened this week. She writes that her work deeply reflects the cause for social and racial justice. She writes that she will carry on working to ensure Black voices are heard at the heart of our democracy. She writes that she wants her work to continue to be reflective of black and ethnic minority experiences in Birmingham.

Not all voices. Black voices. Not all experiences. Black and ethnic minority experiences. That is the Home Secretary who told Parliament this week there must be no two tier policing. Her own letter is a precise description of two tier political engagement. One standard applied to George Floyd. A different standard applied to Henry Nowak.

The progressive institutional machinery was operational within hours of Floyd's death. The hashtag was ready. The language was ready. The political network was ready. Mahmood's letter was part of that machinery. It was produced within four days because the machinery runs automatically when the case fits the framework. Black Lives Matter had been founded in 2013. By 2020 it had dozens of local chapters, a global network, corporate donors worth hundreds of millions of dollars and political allies embedded across every major Western government. When Floyd died every node of that network activated simultaneously. Mahmood's letter was one activation among millions.

Henry Nowak's case does not fit the framework. His killer used the progressive framework as the murder weapon. His case does not vindicate the ideology of anti-racism training. It exposes it. And the Home Secretary whose entire political career has been built around that ideology found herself at the despatch box this week condemning its most visible consequence while declining to name its cause.

She wrote in 2020 that she would ensure Black voices are heard at the heart of our democracy. She has kept that promise. The question Henry Nowak's family is entitled to ask is which voices were heard at the heart of the institutions that trained the officers who handcuffed their son. The Hampshire Race Action Plan. The NPCC guidance. The College of Policing practice bank. The Metropolitan Police neutrality myth. All of it built by the same political framework Mahmood has spent her career advancing.

There must be no two tier policing. She is right. The letter she wrote in 2020 explains precisely why there is.

170

300

207K

Who to follow

bertiewilsmoon

@bertiewilsonmo1

Proud to be English and sad to see the state we have let this country get into. The silent majority are getting restless !! VOTE REFORM and join the Revolt!

PhoenixFire7171

@phoenixvaryahf

Business owner. Christian. Conservative. I don’t post comments anymore. I lurk, sadly.

DaHo

@DaHoHil13

Percy05 🐶😍 @janePercy05

19 days ago

Demand justice for Henry Nowak: charge the officers, publish the findings - Sign the Petition! https://t.co/33lGQ3dWBT via @UKChange

Percy05 🐶😍 @janePercy05

22 days ago

janePercy05 retweeted

Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧

@JChimirie66677

22 days ago

.@EdwardJDavey You speak of threats to British democracy. Here's one that doesn't feature in your framing. In Bournemouth, a constituency governed by a Liberal Democrat controlled council, three taxpayer funded asylum hotels have produced 116 criminal charges against 51 residents. A young woman, Cleo Lake, was punched unconscious for rejecting a man's advances. A nineteen year old was raped in a portable toilet on the seafront. A Somali asylum seeker told a police officer when I kill someone here, you come for me after avoiding jail three times. Your party opposes every enforcement measure that would empty those hotels. Your biggest election donor in 2024 made his fortune running a company that provided a quarter of all Home Office asylum accommodation before it was stripped of its contract for substandard performance. The threat to British women walking home at night in Bournemouth is considerably more immediate than Elon Musk's posts on X. But it doesn't feature in your framing because it doesn't fit the narrative. "Cleo Lake was punched unconscious for rejecting a man's advances."

JChimirie66677's tweet photo. .@EdwardJDavey You speak of threats to British democracy. Here's one that doesn't feature in your framing. In Bournemouth, a constituency governed by a Liberal Democrat controlled council, three taxpayer funded asylum hotels have produced 116 criminal charges against 51 residents. A young woman, Cleo Lake, was punched unconscious for rejecting a man's advances. A nineteen year old was raped in a portable toilet on the seafront. A Somali asylum seeker told a police officer when I kill someone here, you come for me after avoiding jail three times. Your party opposes every enforcement measure that would empty those hotels. Your biggest election donor in 2024 made his fortune running a company that provided a quarter of all Home Office asylum accommodation before it was stripped of its contract for substandard performance. The threat to British women walking home at night in Bournemouth is considerably more immediate than Elon Musk's posts on X. But it doesn't feature in your framing because it doesn't fit the narrative.

"Cleo Lake was punched unconscious for rejecting a man's advances."

45K

Percy05 🐶😍 @janePercy05

23 days ago

Call for investigation into police handling of Henry Nowak case - Sign the Petition! https://t.co/ciJiNASWXC via @UKChange

Percy05 🐶😍 @janePercy05

26 days ago

https://t.co/rw3k8fHiee?

Percy05 🐶😍 @janePercy05

28 days ago

Ban the sale of private e-bikes and e-scooters - Sign the Petition! https://t.co/kM0n7etYuR via @UKChange

Percy05 🐶😍 @janePercy05

about 1 month ago

Call for investigation into police handling of Henry Nowak case - Sign the Petition! https://t.co/1Bz0l2jmAP via @UKChange

Percy05 🐶😍 @janePercy05

about 1 month ago

Very interesting and informative post. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧

@JChimirie66677

about 1 month ago

You Want To Talk About Foreign Money, Ed? Let's Talk About Your Money. @EdwardJDavey, three points that demand a response. You invoke Ted Heath's sacking of Enoch Powell as the model for dealing with unacceptable speech. Powell was sacked for predicting, with documented demographic evidence, what is now visibly happening in British cities. The political class that applauded Heath's decision spent the next fifty years ensuring that nobody could say what Powell said without career destruction. The result is not a more harmonious society. It is the one we are living in now. The cordon sanitaire you want to rebuild is the mechanism that prevented honest conversation about immigration, integration and parallel communities until the consequences became undeniable. Rebuilding it now is a demand to return to the conditions that produced the problem. On antisemitism at both demonstrations. You claim antisemitic slurs appeared on placards at both marches. If specific antisemitic incidents occurred at the Unite the Kingdom march they should be named, documented and prosecuted. Vague claims that both marches were equally antisemitic without specific evidence is precisely the false equivalence that allowed genuine antisemitism to flourish unchallenged for two and a half years. The antisemitism documented across thirty three pro-Palestinian marches since October 2023, the death to Israel chants, the red triangles, the Iranian regime flags, is on the public record. Name the equivalent from Saturday's march or withdraw the claim. The real problem lies closer to home. In the captured institutions that produced the progressive mindset now visible in BBC newsrooms, government departments, HR bureaucracies and university humanities faculties. Those institutions were not captured by the far right. They were captured by the progressive left over fifty years of patient institutional work, a process Gramsci theorised in the 1930s and Dutschke operationalised in the 1960s. That capture has produced a generation that cannot define a woman, treats the Union Jack as a symbol of fascism, marches under Iranian regime flags and describes Jews as an abomination to this planet in private WhatsApp groups. The march you find sickening is the reaction to that capture. Addressing the reaction without addressing the cause is not leadership. It is evasion dressed as principle. And stopping the flow of Qatari money into British universities, which has funded the academic infrastructure producing that generation, would be a more productive use of your energy than rebuilding a cordon sanitaire around anyone who names what has happened. On foreign funding. Since you raise it so forcefully the Liberal Democrats need to answer some questions of their own. Your biggest election donor in 2024 was Safwan Adam, a director of Stay Belvedere Hotels Limited, a firm that ran 51 hotels housing asylum seekers across England and Wales, provided approximately a quarter of all Home Office asylum places and reported nearly £705 million in income in a single year while paying out £45 million in dividends. Adam gave your party nearly £500,000 before the July 2024 election and over £750,000 across that year. The firm was subsequently stripped of its Home Office contract due to concerns about its performance. The Liberal Democrats, the party demanding stronger borders against foreign money in politics, were bankrolled by the man who made a fortune from the border crisis your policies would deepen. Elon Musk's funding of British politics is a legitimate concern. So is the Qatari money flowing into British universities producing the generation now marching under Hamas symbols. So is the Iranian funding of mosques documented by the Henry Jackson Society. And so is your biggest donor making hundreds of millions from the asylum crisis while your party campaigns to expand it. "Safwan Adam gave your party nearly £500,000 before the July 2024 election and over £750,000 across that year."

JChimirie66677's tweet photo. You Want To Talk About Foreign Money, Ed? Let's Talk About Your Money.

@EdwardJDavey, three points that demand a response.

You invoke Ted Heath's sacking of Enoch Powell as the model for dealing with unacceptable speech. Powell was sacked for predicting, with documented demographic evidence, what is now visibly happening in British cities. The political class that applauded Heath's decision spent the next fifty years ensuring that nobody could say what Powell said without career destruction. The result is not a more harmonious society. It is the one we are living in now. The cordon sanitaire you want to rebuild is the mechanism that prevented honest conversation about immigration, integration and parallel communities until the consequences became undeniable. Rebuilding it now is a demand to return to the conditions that produced the problem.

On antisemitism at both demonstrations. You claim antisemitic slurs appeared on placards at both marches. If specific antisemitic incidents occurred at the Unite the Kingdom march they should be named, documented and prosecuted. Vague claims that both marches were equally antisemitic without specific evidence is precisely the false equivalence that allowed genuine antisemitism to flourish unchallenged for two and a half years. The antisemitism documented across thirty three pro-Palestinian marches since October 2023, the death to Israel chants, the red triangles, the Iranian regime flags, is on the public record. Name the equivalent from Saturday's march or withdraw the claim.

The real problem lies closer to home. In the captured institutions that produced the progressive mindset now visible in BBC newsrooms, government departments, HR bureaucracies and university humanities faculties. Those institutions were not captured by the far right. They were captured by the progressive left over fifty years of patient institutional work, a process Gramsci theorised in the 1930s and Dutschke operationalised in the 1960s. That capture has produced a generation that cannot define a woman, treats the Union Jack as a symbol of fascism, marches under Iranian regime flags and describes Jews as an abomination to this planet in private WhatsApp groups. The march you find sickening is the reaction to that capture. Addressing the reaction without addressing the cause is not leadership. It is evasion dressed as principle. And stopping the flow of Qatari money into British universities, which has funded the academic infrastructure producing that generation, would be a more productive use of your energy than rebuilding a cordon sanitaire around anyone who names what has happened.

On foreign funding. Since you raise it so forcefully the Liberal Democrats need to answer some questions of their own. Your biggest election donor in 2024 was Safwan Adam, a director of Stay Belvedere Hotels Limited, a firm that ran 51 hotels housing asylum seekers across England and Wales, provided approximately a quarter of all Home Office asylum places and reported nearly £705 million in income in a single year while paying out £45 million in dividends. Adam gave your party nearly £500,000 before the July 2024 election and over £750,000 across that year. The firm was subsequently stripped of its Home Office contract due to concerns about its performance. The Liberal Democrats, the party demanding stronger borders against foreign money in politics, were bankrolled by the man who made a fortune from the border crisis your policies would deepen.

Elon Musk's funding of British politics is a legitimate concern. So is the Qatari money flowing into British universities producing the generation now marching under Hamas symbols. So is the Iranian funding of mosques documented by the Henry Jackson Society. And so is your biggest donor making hundreds of millions from the asylum crisis while your party campaigns to expand it.

"Safwan Adam gave your party nearly £500,000 before the July 2024 election and over £750,000 across that year."

607

134

24K

Percy05 🐶😍 @janePercy05

about 1 month ago

@plexaleOK 🇬🇧

Percy05 🐶😍 @janePercy05

about 1 month ago

❤️❤️❤️❤️

Percy05 🐶😍 @janePercy05

about 1 month ago

OMG!!! 😱

Percy05 🐶😍 @janePercy05

about 1 month ago

@MorEdge_Insight ❤️❤️❤️❤️👌

Percy05 🐶😍 @janePercy05

about 1 month ago

Wow 🤩

Mor Edge Insight

@MorEdge_Insight

about 1 month ago

Israel defeating cancer, again. This Israeli technology can destroy tumors by freezing them, without surgery or radiation. IceCure Medical’s ProSense system uses cryoablation. A tiny probe delivers extreme cold (liquid nitrogen) to precisely freeze and kill cancerous tumors in the breast, kidney, lung, liver, and bone. The procedure takes minutes under local anesthesia, and many patients go home the same day. Already FDA-cleared and used worldwide, it offers a minimally invasive option with faster recovery and fewer side effects. This isn’t science fiction anymore. It’s Israeli innovation giving cancer patients a gentler, more precise path forward. Proud every single day. 🇮🇱 #IceCure #Cryoablation #CancerTreatment #IsraelInnovation #StartupNation