It is a world of possibilities out there. And in a world where you can be anything, CHOOSE:
• To build bridges, instead of walls.
• To spread love, not hate.
• To be kind, expecting nothing in return.
• To see first, humanity in every being.
Today In Dystopia: "We Have Cameras Everywhere In That Town"
Today in dystopia, police have been wrongfully arresting people based on faulty information from AI-assisted Flock surveillance footage instead of actually investigating the evidence of the crime.
Reading by Tim Foley.
The U.S. Embassy Job Advert That Says the Quiet Part Out Loud
A recent U.S. Embassy job listing in Abuja seeks candidates to map, predict, and cultivate local influencers and community attitudes across Nigeria.
While presented under the cover of youth development and cultural exchange, peeling back the diplomatic jargon exposes the underlying mechanics of foreign influence operating inside a sovereign nation.
There is a version of anti-imperialism that is, functionally, a fan club for a different empire.
It replaces "America should dominate the world" with "China should dominate the world" or "Russia should dominate the world" and believes it has said something radical.
It has not.
It has said the same sentence with different nouns.
The actual radical position is harder to hold and less emotionally satisfying:
That no power should be able to dictate the terms of existence to smaller nations.
That sovereignty is not a privilege distributed by great powers to compliant clients.
That the architecture of the global economy should not be designed, regardless of who designs it, to extract from the periphery and accumulate at the center.
That position requires you to criticize your preferred pole when it behaves like an empire.
Most people cannot do this.
Most people need a protagonist.
The multipolar world is not a story with a protagonist.
That is precisely what makes it better.
And precisely what makes it so difficult for people raised on imperial narratives to actually want it.
Jools documents how Professor Jason Arday was legitimately cleared of plagiarism with the main issue being poor referencing and The Spectator’s Lara Brown’s biased and anti DEI reporting on this.
#RipJasonArday
Did @thetimes ever put an ad budget behind a story about British royal family member Prince Andrew Windsor fucking babies on Epstein Island? Did they spend money to boost a story about Peter Mandelson , Epstein's British bestie, and chase you around Twitter with it for days?
Tell me again that this was really about some dissertation of a university professor!
Driving home, 2011. Checkpoint. Drunk policeman.
3 gun shots, one bullet punched through my car boot into my right hand.
That hand once edit, animated, paid bills and fed my family. Overnight it became dead weight.
Career gone. Marriage cracked. Mind still bleeding daily.I sued the Nigeria Police.
2015: Federal High Court ordered them to fund reconstructive surgery to restore my life.
Eleven years later: zero naira, zero apology, zero accountability.
I still can’t fully use the hand they destroyed. Still begging strangers so I don’t lose it forever.
The Nigeria Police that shot me ignores the court. Who protects the rest of us?
@MobilePunch@TunjiDisu1@UNDP @NhrcNigeria
#NigeriaPoliceNotYourFriend #JusticeForTomori
What they've done to Jason Arday is exactly what they tried to do to Onyeka Nwelue and I three years ago, when I had a front row seat to my own attempted public ritual Oxbridge lynching.
After failing to sabotage my book launch at Oxford, they got one Canadian animal called Madeleine Foote to lie that I made "misogynistic comments" at the book launch. Then they launched a whole "fuck David Hundeyin" media crusade in the Oxford student newspaper, The TImes, The Telegraph etc. You'd have thought I committed a fucking crime or something.
But clearly they didn't do their research well. Because unlike with Jason, you can't mentally terrorise Nigerian men who were born and raised in Nigeria. If they know what it takes to survive and reach adulthood in that country, they wouldn't even have bothered.
The book whose launch they tried to sabotage became a national bestseller, and so did its follow-up. Miles Larmer the oyibo idiot who orchestrated the campaign ended up losing his job at Oxford and getting turfed out to some random university in Florida. His 2 main financial patrons Nasir El-Rufai and Chairman Wontumi are both in Kuje and Nsawam prison respectively.
And I will keep that "2023 James Currey Fellow, Cambridge University" on all my social media bios until I turn 60. Not because it means a lot to me, but because I know it pisses them off everyday.
RIP to Jason Arday, but when you're up against a racist academic lynch mob, the worst thing to do is to give them what they want. Taking his own life didn't solve anything because I know they're all secretly delighted at his death. The entire point of convening the lynch mob to begin with was to demonstrate that they are powerful enough to bully a once highly-regarded black academic into suicide, and this was exactly what I told Onyeka in 2023 when he was going through the same thing and feeling suicidal.
Never give them what they want!
I don't care whether Jason Arday was an academic fraud or not. Andrew Windsor a.k.a "Prince Andrew" is a paedophile who rapes children and eats babies, and there are pictures of him doing so on public record. Nobody in the entire British establishment has ever tried to bully him into taking his life. It's always the easiest, blackest targets that they go for because that is the fundamental core of the wretched British soul.
Cowardly, snivelling, conniving, two-faced, pathetic racist bastards.
IMPORTANT.
A CNN journalist witnessed Israeli settlers abduct and blindfold a Palestinian farmer for refusing to leave his land, as IDF soldiers stood guard.
He was later shot, while the IDF blocked the road to prevent anyone from coming to his aid, making sure he would die.
NSSM-200. National Security Study Memorandum 200. 1974. Written under Henry Kissinger.
Classified until 1989.
Its subject: world population growth and its implications for American national security.
Its argument: population growth in the developing world, specifically in thirteen countries identified by name, including Nigeria, Brazil, India, Indonesia, Mexico, represented a strategic threat to the United States.
Not because overpopulation causes humanitarian crisis.
Because large, young populations in resource-rich countries create political pressure for those countries to control their own resources.
The memo was explicit: if developing countries develop politically conscious, resource-nationalist governments responding to their own populations' needs, they will demand control of their oil, their minerals, their agricultural land.
And that control would come at the expense of American access.
The solution proposed was population control programs, funded through USAID and international organizations, targeting those specific countries.
Not as humanitarian aid.
As strategic intervention to reduce the political pressure that large populations place on governments to actually serve their people.
This document exists. It is declassified. You can read it.
And then you can look at fifty years of American-funded population programs in the Global South with the full knowledge of what the architects said, privately, in 1974, about what those programs were actually for.
The aid was real.
The stated purpose was false.
The document says so.
They are not invincible.
They never were.
The invincibility was always partly theater, maintained by the willingness of enough people to act as though it were real.
The aircraft carriers are real. The sanctions are real. The capacity to destabilize, to starve, to bomb, to fund opposition, to manipulate elections, all of it is real, and it causes real suffering, and no one should be naive about the cost of resistance.
But invincibility? The idea that resistance is futile, that the outcome is predetermined, that a small country or a poor people cannot outlast a superpower's will?
Vietnam answered that.
Cuba answered that.
Iran answered that.
The answer keeps getting given and keeps being ignored, because the machinery of empire needs you to believe in the invincibility more than it needs any particular military victory.
Fear is cheaper than occupation.
The day you stop being afraid is more dangerous to them than any weapon.
That is why so much energy, the think tanks, the media, the sanctions, the color revolutions, the endless theater of consequences, is directed not at your military capacity.
It is directed at your psychology.
They need you to believe you cannot win.
We won.
Stop believing them.
The same country building this data centre is currently funding NGOs in Kilimani to tell you not to build an oil refinery in Lamu.
They think you have the intelligence of a rhesus monkey, and well, you have the opportunity to prove them right.
Whenever you wake up...
For the Africans not paying attention, this means that politically exposed African public officials with US residency like Ken Ofori-Atta and Oyindamola Tinubu who have moved stolen African money into the US via their US-registered companies are no longer required to declare ownership of those companies, and there is no longer any legal way to find out that they own those companies.
The US government which is funding all these stupid NGOs in Nairobi and Abuja to fill your head with nonsense is the same US government that has just openly given the green light to every kleptocrat in Africa to come and launder the money stolen from you in America. After throwing peanuts at Boniface Mwangi, Yele Sowore, Aisha Yesufu, Martha Karua, Samson Itodo, Yemi Adamolekun etc to parrot "hOld yOuR lEaDerS aCcoUntAbLe aNd sToP bLaMinG wHiTe PeOplE", this is what they're doing with the leaders in question.
Whenever you wake up...
Britain of all countries, is now doing "expropriation without compensation" on the grounds of "national security."
Once again, whatever oyibo tells you not to do is EXACTLY what you should do because oyibo is the world's most prolific LIAR.,
The most insidious form of mind control is when people manage to colonise the very meaning of words. Words are what humans use to describe and interpret reality, so whoever controls the use of words controls how humans perceive reality.
So you hear "Democracy" and ypu instantly think "USA", or you hear "Dictatorship" and you instantly think "China". Meanwhile what is the dictionary definition of the word "democracy"? Government of the people, for the people, by the people.
Is the US government a government "of" the people? No, it's actually a government of a small group of rich white men who control absolutely everything from abortion law to music record labels. They fund and control a political doupoly where nothing changes as power passes back and forth between both parties, except some peripheral culture war bullshit. The will of "the people" is not meaningfully represented and they have no actual say in how they are governed because the extent of their involvement in the system is to vote for either the blue or the red branch of the same system owned by Peter ThielMuskWinklevossGatesEllisonEpsteinvonWhiteManberg.
Is it a government "for" the people? Fuck no, even Americans will tell you that. The purpose of the US government is to help rich white people become richer at the expense of everybody else including poor white people. There is literally a court decision (Citizens United) which gives unrestricted power to US corporations over US electoral compaigns. Meanwhile, the US has the world's largest population of imprisoned people (most of whom are used as slave labour because prisons naturally, are part of their economic system), as well as a shocking prevalence of homelessness for a supposedly wealthy country.
Is it a government "by" the people? Not even close. Americans know as little about their government and the things it does as people who have never been there. No American ever voted for their government to fund terrorists in your country halfway around the world, or create and arm drug cartels in your country that can't locate on a map, or fund colour revolutions and regime change operations in your country on the other side of the planet whose name they can't pronounce. Yet their government does all these things and more, because they have no real involvement in or visibility over how it works.
But that is a "Democracy". And not just any democracy - THE "democracy".
Yet China, where citizens understand exactly how their government operates; where the process of entering government is entirely transparent, accessible and obvious to everyone with no hidden infrastructure or secret societies controlling anything behind the scenes; where the state exists entirely to serve the Chinese people and make their lives better instead of getting embroiled in multiple foreign wars and genocidal adventurism; where 96% of Chinese households own their own home; where the state has been able to build the world's only national bullet train network - that is the nation that is apparently "not democratic."
Using the dictionary definition of "Democracy", China is in fact a "Democracy" and the US runs a feudalist system of governance.
But when you colonise the dictionary and dominate what people take into their brains everyday for several decades, this entirely factual tweet becomes "controversial".
That is literally mind control.