From the Pragmatic Programmer 2nd edition: "...jargon - either perfectly good English words that have been corrupted to mean something technical, or horrendous made-up words that have been assigned by computer scientists with a grudge against the language." @pragprog I feel you.
@Twitter All these irrelevant "recent tweet" notifications have led me to disable all notifications. Since focus and filtering for relevant inbound from all of today's platforms is is hard enough as it is, I think I'll leave Twitter if this doesn't change. #add#ADHD
@Office365 So I'm trying to set up my authenticator and the QR code doesn't work. The alternative seems to be to use a 9 digit code in combination with a URL: https://t.co/BdPg038WIx<ninedigits>/<threecharacters> so that's a 71 character url, on my phone... #ux#fail
@Rabobank Dank voor de reactie. Zonder iets te hebben veranderd kom ik er nu gewoon weer in. Wat er ook aan de hand was, het lijkt tijdelijk te zijn geweest. https://t.co/pn5NwhEbSW
@LidlNederland Natuurlijk. De impact van het dichtdoen van de deur van de koeling lijkt mij verwaarloosbaar gezien er een open verbinding is met de sectie daarnaast, welke zonder deuren is uitgevoerd.
Wel erg gemakkelijk. Op je eigen website aangeven dat 100% van je reviews 5 sterren is, maar reviews die geen 5 sterren zijn (die van mij toevallig) niet plaatsen. Want ja, dat zou toch zonde zijn van die 5 sterren... @Vitaliabeauty
Idea for videoconferencing: A hotkey-switch for a presenter to switch to a random participant and place him/her top centre (right under the camera). So that you can simulate looking around a room and address sentences to specific people, like you would irl. @MicrosoftTeams@Zoom
Of je nu in simpele spreadsheets werkt of (zoals in dit voorbeeld) een Tutorial maakt voor een heule grote mutlinational: Besteed alsjeblieft iets meer aandacht aan goede naamgeving. #gemistekans
@MSPowerAutomate I enabled experimental settings and see that it is fixed. I'm not sure if my tweets had anything to do with this, but thank you anyway.
@MSPowerAutomate "Mark as yes" in a function called "Mark as read or unread" is quite unclear to me. I think this could be improved by being able to choose read/unread instead of yes/no, or replacing "Mark as" with "Mark as read"
@MSPowerAutomate I am considering it, although don't get why this needs a feature request that needs to gather support. "Mark as Yes" on a feature called "Mark as read or unread" is clearly confusing. Wouldn't you agree?