@TruthTellerDotC@officialsammyuk@DarrylMagher As far as I can see he was defending his name and reputation. His tireless fight for justice for survivors and exposing the corruption behind it will be his legacy. I don't see a man thirsty for fame. Those who turned on him should be ashamed of themselves.
@zev_dr@frank_zelenko Lovely way to honour your brother....a gentleman with courage, heart and integrity. He brought hope and light into our lives during very dark times.
What an insane thing to say!
The real reason is that it would show how Starmer repeatedly ignored the pleas of vast numbers of little girls and their parents, in order to secure political support.
Starmer is utterly despicable.
Resign? That’s not enough.
Anything short of Justin Trudeau being arrested is a failure—this man is a terrorist against his own people. He made countless good and innocent people suffer deeply—psychologically, physically, and financially.
He destroyed livelihoods, stole incomes, harassed his own citizens, and devastated small businesses. He locked people in their homes, silenced dissenters, froze the bank accounts of protesters, and criminalized freedom of expression.
He harmed children through unnecessary school closures, forced compliance with harmful mandates, and supported the chemical and physical castration of children under the guise of gender ideology.
He imported terrorists, neglected public safety, divided families, eroded trust in institutions, and stripped away freedoms that generations fought to protect.
You name it, he did it—all while masquerading as a champion of equality and progress."
Today, a number of prominent journalists criticised my suggestion that the UK media class has failed to sufficiently cover the rape gangs scandal, which will go down as one of the biggest scandals in our history
So, I decided to take a closer look at the data.
Trust me, you'll want to read until the end
First, the boring bit. How did I do it?
I used something called Lexis, a database researchers use to search content across UK newspapers
Every good researcher out there knows how to use it so they can duplicate my work and check
One of my critics today said my use of "grooming gangs" in my initial numbers was misleading because much of the coverage in UK newspapers uses "grooming gang" not "gangS".
OK then, let's use that
And let's just look at articles that are specifically about this scandal and don't just mention it in passing
What did I find?
Let's look at the years 2011-2025 because before that, even though the rape gangs scandal goes back decades, there was NOTHING in UK media.
Nothing.
They didn't touch it AT ALL --despite widespread rumours pushed by groups like the BNP and EDL
2011 is a crucial year because it's when renegade and HERO Andrew Norfolk, at The Times, started to write the first early pieces, despite abuse & harassment
First, let's look at ALL UK newspapers
In 2011-2025 there were 4,659 articles specifically focused on the "grooming gang" phenomenon
Wow
Sounds a lot right?
Remember the number.
"Grooming gang" = 4,659
But now let's compare that with how much coverage the media class gave to other scandals and terms
"white privilege" = 6,146
"anti-Muslim" = 17,152
"post office" and "horizon" =20,274
"extreme right" = 21,252
"Islamophobia" = 23,461
"Greta Thunberg" = 22,717
"expenses scandal" =25,585
"Stephen Lawrence" = 29,808
"anti-racism" = 34,484
"Windrush" = 35,515
"George Floyd" = 38,824
"Black Lives Matter" = 59,338
"Grenfell" = 71,422
"Britain" and "racism" = 75,693
"Net Zero" = 141,367
"far right" = 231,540
"racism" = 382,069
I could go on.
I think the numbers speak for themselves.
Relative to other scandals and amid a strong liberal bias in parts of the media class, the mass rape of young, working-class white girls & women just wasn't a priority
Yes, there were newspapers that broke the story and pushed it, like the Times in 2011
But even there, the 440 articles built around "grooming gang" between 2011-2025 is dwarfed by, say, the 2,868 on "Islamophobia", the 3,202 on Stephen Lawrence, the 2,603 on George Floyd, or the 5,524 on BLM
My point is not to bash individual newspapers but to say that relative to other race-related stories and debates, the rape gangs scandal --ARGUABLY THE BIGGEST SCANDAL IN OUR HISTORY-- has received very little coverage from the media class
I'd give you the numbers for liberal progressive papers like The Guardian/Observer but frankly they're absurd
Oh ok then
Between 2011 and 2025 the Guardian had 113 articles on the grooming gang phenomenon compared to 3,325 for "Islamophobia"
What about the BBC?
We can look at BBC News 24 and BBC Radio 4
There were 357 specific mentions of the "grooming gang" scandal in BBC News/Radio 4 transcripts
Meanwhile, there were 7,537 for "George Floyd", 3,219 for "Stephen Lawrence", 7,416 for "Black Lives Matter", and 2,259 for "Islamophobia"
You get the picture. I won't keep going
But what I will say is this.
These girls were never a priority in Media Land
Relative to other scandals they were at first ignored and then downplayed
Too many of the middle-class, Oxbridge-educated, socially liberal if not radically woke progressive elites who control the parameters of what they think is our national "debate" routinely steer clear of scandals and issues that violate tightly-controlled taboos around immigration, multiculturalism, "diversity" in all its forms, and which are backed up with alarmist narratives about the "far right" and "Islamophobia" to warn others off from asking difficult questions or challenging the elite consensus in Westminster and London
This HAS to change
As I wrote in my Substack this morning, @elonmusk has done Britain a favour by forcing us to reckon with a truly NATIONAL scandal that has for too long been ignored and pushed to the side by political, media, and cultural elites in wider society
This past week, we have been pushed into a new era in which millions of people up and down this country are either learning about the rape gangs crisis for the first time or hearing shocking new details they did not know before and can scarcely believe
And millions of people are now asking some enormous questions. How did our country let this happen to our children? Why was it overlooked? Why did so many people stay silent? Is it still happening today? What can we do to stop it? Who is pursuing the truth in media? Who is naming and shaming? And why does the UK media class fall over itself when a single American man dies in Minneapolis while seemingly not giving a shit about the thousands of CHILDREN who have been abused, raped and harassed here in Britain?
The people have tuned into this scandal, in other words. They have taken notice and they are watching. The only question now is whether the media class has bothered to notice and will actually get on top of this scandal and push it to front of the agenda or continue to ask ridiculous questions like it did for much of today, deflecting from its glaring failures to instead obsess about Elon Musk.
Find the truth and tell us the truth.
That's your job.
My friend tried to withdraw £20k from Natwest bank & their response was shocking
For 30 years my friend has been a loyal customer
He called to withdraw the money & they said no
He went into the branch and asked face to face to withdraw the £20k and they asked 'what it’s for'
He said ’none of your business, it’s my money’
They said ‘unless you can tell us exactly what the money is for, you cannot withdraw it'
This should shock & terrify you.
Your own money isn’t even yours anymore
Few people understand what the war in Ukraine means for big business. It’s not just the weapons and reconstruction contracts. Ukraine’s vast agricultural lands—among the most fertile in the world—are up for grabs, and American companies like BlackRock are at front of the line.
@elonmusk Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, please do me a quick favor and follow this page (@VigilantFox) before you go.
In other news, Bill Gates is now in trouble for lying to the public about the COVID vaccines. See more details on that below:
https://t.co/OYWbgdvOsU
Massive Study Confirms Heart Damage Only Occurs in COVID-Vaxxed Kids
We tried to warn you.
The study involving 1.7 million children found myocarditis and pericarditis only occurred in kids who received the COVID jabs.
No cases were found in the unvaxxed group, making it clear that these heart issues are directly tied to the shots.
Led by Oxford University’s Professor Colm D. Andrews and published as a preprint in MedRxiv, the study also delivered another blow: the so-called vaccine wore off after just 14 to 15 weeks.
The so-called “conspiracy theorists” warned that the COVID shots were all harm and no benefit. Now, the data speaks for itself—again.
Even more alarming, a separate report has revealed a catastrophic 500% increase in deaths among vaxxed children compared to their unvaxxed peers.
The data is clear. The shots were a crime against children.
How many more kids need to suffer before the medical community accepts this uncomfortable reality?
Aseem Malhotra is one of the World’s leading cardiologists and the media are finally putting out the truth about DNA contamination in the shots and the risks to health .
If you took the ‘Covid Vaccine’…you were injected with cancer.
When Oncologists tell you that the ‘Covid Vaccine’ causes aggressive cancer…please listen…
Public Health has OUTRIGHT refused to monitor Cancer after the rollout of the Biological Weapon.
*Amazon bans access to life saving cancer treatment!* At FLCCC, we advocate for cancer patients worldwide who deserve access to all available treatment options. In this open letter to @jeffbezos and @Amazon leadership, we address their recent decision to ban a critical resource—@drpaulmarik’s 'Cancer Care: The Role of Repurposed Drugs and Metabolic Interventions in Treating Cancer' book.
Please share and hold @jeffbezos, @amazon, and @AmazonKDP accountable.
1/3