@flushingitgolf Success is what will bond the International team and secure it's future as a contender in this competition. Future young stars will also see the success of the International team and view the President's Cup as an interesting competition to be a part of. Overall good for golf.
@FOXFOOTY Wharfie time died today. It simply can not be brought back after what happened in this game. It was fun, but ultimately it has run its course
@RalphyHeraldSun Wharfie time died today. It simply can not be brought back after what happened in this game. It was fun, but ultimately it has run its course.
@FOXFOOTY Wharfie time died today. It simply can not be brought back after what happened in this game. It was fun, but ultimately it has run its course
"If I was being completely honest, you guys deserved to win today."
Humble words by Chris Fagan in his post GF speech. But ultimately, it's cold comfort for a team and supporter base that now faces a very long off season living with the memory of such a heartbreaking GF loss.
@AFL Humble words by Chris Fagan. But ultimately, it's cold comfort for a team and supporter base that now faces a very long off season living with the memory of such a heartbreaking GF loss.
@FOXFOOTY For a league that frequently talks about the word of law, doing things by the book, and equalising the competition, they sure do seem to pull out preferential rules for certain clubs/players. What a shambles this league's management is at the moment. (2/2)
@FOXFOOTY Simply ridiculous. Once again our league embarrasses itself.
What a terrible precedent to allow someone off the hook, simply because the game is a grand final and because of a "good record". Even though he's been cited in the past for gut punches, make it make sense. (1/2)
The AFL constantly talks about the word of law, doing things by the book, and equalising the competition, yet they seem to frequently allow seemingly preferential treatment for certain clubs and/or players. What a shambles this league's management is at the moment. (3/3)
What a terrible precedent it sets to allow someone off the hook and to play, simply because the next game is a grand final and because of a "good record". Even though it's notable that Neale has been cited in the past for gut punches, it doesn't make any sense. (2/3)
@RalphyHeraldSun For a league that constantly talks about the word of law, doing things by the book, and equalising the competition, they sure do seem to pull out preferential treatment for certain clubs/players. What a shambles this league's management is at the moment. (2/2)
@RalphyHeraldSun Simply ridiculous. Once again our league embarrasses itself.
What a terrible precedent to allow someone off the hook, simply because the game is a grand final and because of a "good record". Even though he's been cited in the past for gut punches, make it make sense. (1/2)
@cleary_mitch@7NewsMelbourne@7NewsBrisbane@7AFL@triplemfooty For a league that constantly talks about the word of law, doing things by the book, and equalising the competition, they sure do seem to pull out preferential rules for certain clubs/players. What a shambles this league's management is at the moment. (2/2)
@cleary_mitch@7NewsMelbourne@7NewsBrisbane@7AFL@triplemfooty Simply ridiculous. Once again our league embarrasses itself.
What a terrible precedent to allow someone off the hook, simply because the game is a grand final and because of a "good record". Even though he's been cited in the past for gut punches, make it make sense. (1/2)
@FOXFOOTY For a league that constantly talks about the word of law, doing things by the book, and equalising the competition, they sure do seem to pull out preferential rules for certain clubs/players. What a shambles this league's management is at the moment. (2/2)
@FOXFOOTY Simply ridiculous. Once again our league embarrasses itself.
What a terrible precedent to allow someone off the hook, simply because the game is a grand final and because of a "good record". Even though he's been cited in the past for gut punches, make it make sense. (1/2)
@AFL For a league that frequently talks about the word of law, doing things by the book, and equalising the competition, they sure do seem to pull out preferential rules for certain clubs/players. What a shambles this league's management is at the moment. (2/2)
@AFL Simply ridiculous. Once again our league embarrasses itself.
What a terrible precedent to allow someone off the hook, simply because the game is a grand final and because of a "good record". Even though he's been cited in the past for gut punches, make it make sense. (1/2)