NBC is making more propaganda for illegals
They’re running a story about 2 teenagers having their illegal parents deported by ICE and forced to “live on their own”
Except they were immediately taken in by their aunt… Ohh and her illegal parents were arrested for shoplifting. ICE also gave the illegal mother the option of taking her children with her back to Honduras, which she wants. But she choose no to because it meant she would have to stay in detention for a couple months while that process was worked out
So here we have the mainstream media stirring up outrage over illegals who broke into our county, had anchor babies, got deported and then didn’t want to wait a couple months to be with their kids
Leftists will spend 30 years crying about separation between church and state, reading the Bible in schools, public Christian prayers... and then turn around and pass Muslim Sharia laws. It was always a cynical, dishonest way to purge Christians from public culture.
In a free market with a wage mechanism there is no such thing as a labor shortage
You just don’t want to pay Americans a decent wage so you want to replace them with cheap foreign labor
If Haitians are deported, Americans will pay even higher prices for groceries, health care, housing, and child care."
- Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Meet the epitome of a Democrat idiot!!
This is:
The United Nations’ KEY ARCHITECT behind mass migration, seeking to overthrow the Constitutional Republic of the United States and take down Western civilization as we know it.
This is Amy Pope — the UN’s OPEN-BORDERS CHIEF:
“Our number one goal is to really harness the benefits of and the promise of migration.”
A former Obama operative and Deputy Homeland Security Advisor under Barack Obama.
– Architect of the “Countering Violent Extremism” program that removed references to Islam and jihad from FBI training.
– Creator of Barack Obama’s #RefugeesWelcome campaign, following the Arab Spring that began in 2011 — instigated by the Obama Administration itself.
Under the Kenyan Administration, refugee admissions expanded significantly by 2015, including refugees from countries affected by the conflicts and instability that followed the Arab Spring — particularly Syria, but also other countries.
The largest source countries included:
• Democratic Republic of the Congo
• Syria
• Burma (Myanmar)
• Iraq
• Somalia
• Bhutan
• Ukraine
• Eritrea
• Afghanistan
• Iran
• Ethiopia
• Sudan
• Central African Republic
• Colombia
• And Ilhan Omar
Amy Pope, Director General of the UN’s International Organization for Migration (IOM)
– Leads an army of 17,000 employees within a $2.5 billion bureaucracy, alongside a vast network of terrorist organizations disguised as NGOs, 67% funded by the U.S. government — the very government the United Nations is seeking to overthrow, all in the name of “humanitarian aid.”
Democrats keep saying "there are masked men in our streets kidnapping people!😩"
Look you retards...
Nobody is being kidnapped, they're being DEPORTED!!
And we wouldn't have to do ANY OF THIS if you stupid motherfckers hadn't FLOODED OUR DAMN STREETS WITH 20 MILLION ILLEGALS!!
Food is expensive because working Americans have to buy it for ourselves and also for 50 million food stamp recipients and God knows how many USAID/MCC-fed third worlders abroad
Rent is $1700. Electricity is $200+. Used cars are $20k at 12%.
These kids are $60k in debt and bring home $1100 every two weeks from a full time job that’s slowly being replaced by AI or H1B’s.
“Cook at home” is pure boomerslop and why socialism has a foothold you condescending pricks.
Straight Answer
Why would a politician advocate for non-citizens over citizens?
Follow the incentives:
- Non-citizens (and the industries/organizations that benefit from them) provide cheap labor, new consumers, and expanded client bases for certain programs and NGOs.
- Advocacy creates dependent voting blocs over time and delivers campaign support, donor money, and media praise from the groups that profit.
- It signals virtue to the donor class and institutional networks that reward that signal.
- Actual citizens already “belong” to the system... their loyalty is assumed. New or temporary populations can be cultivated as future political capital.
In short: the politician is not optimizing for citizens. They are optimizing for power, money, and status inside the current incentive structure. When those incentives reward prioritizing non-citizens, that is what gets prioritized.
Why would any citizen vote for them?
Several reasons, none of them flattering to the system:
- Many voters never see the trade-off clearly. Media and institutions frame the issue as compassion versus bigotry, not as resource competition, wage pressure, and sovereignty.
- Some voters genuinely believe the policy is moral or economically net-positive and discount the costs.
- Others vote purely on party, tribe, or single issues and ignore the rest.
- A portion benefit directly or indirectly (cheap services, housing demand, institutional funding) and vote accordingly.
- Habit, low information, and the belief that “both sides are the same” keep the pattern alive.
The uncomfortable truth is that the system is designed so that a politician can serve non-citizen interests and still win enough citizen votes to stay in power. Until that incentive structure changes, the behavior continues.
This system is designed so it is working exactly as the incentives dictate.
What’s your take, which incentive do you think is strongest right now?
@ChiefEngineerCE
It used to be that the Senate served at the will of the states.
Now they serve at the will of lobbyists.
The beautiful thing about a six-year term is that only one-third of the members face voters at any given time. Even then, only a handful need to act conservative long enough to survive their primary. Once the election is over, they go right back to business as usual.
This arrangement has been in place for more than a hundred years.
It is the main reason the Senate is the branch of government that most consistently ignores the people who sent them there.
They are insulated by design. Long terms. Staggered elections. Heavy campaign money from the same interests they are supposed to regulate. The structure protects them from real accountability.
That is not an accident. That is the system working exactly as it has been allowed to work.
Under Pedro Sanchez:
- Sex with animals was decriminalized
- Assisted suicide was legalized
- Supervised drug consumption rooms were established
- Sex changes for kids as young as 12 were legalized
- Abortion for 16-year-olds without parental consent was legalized
- A government registry for those caught protesting abortion was created
- The government launched a system to track and crack down on “online hate speech”
- Mass amnesty was granted to 1.5 million African Muslim migrants
This was the trajectory we were on before Trump was elected in 2024. It is how a country is destroyed from the inside.
MY FELLOW AMERICANS,
WE ARE ONLY ONE ELECTION AWAY FROM THIS INSANITY OF OPEN BORDERS HAPPENING AGAIN!!
REPUBLICANS, CHRISTIANS, EVANGELICALS AND AMERICAN PATRIOTS MUST VOTE TO SAVE OUR REPUBLIC!!
What's buried in the story and not included in this headline:
- She entered the U.S. illegally.
- She previously faced federal charges for falsely claiming U.S. citizenship.
- She was detained while a federal warrant was being served at her home (targeting her husband who is facing federal charges).
@mattvanswol It's becoming quite clear that credentialism is the engine of legitimacy for the Deep State.
Not merit. Not results. Not lives saved. Not cases prevented. Awards, grants, degrees, and praise. That is the only feedback they recognize.
The most dangerous person in a free-speech case is not always the speaker.
Sometimes it is the listener the government decides must never be offended.
That is the poison buried inside the Shiloh Hendrix conviction.
Her words were vile. Condemn them. Publish the video. Let the public judge her. But once criminal liability depends on whether someone might react violently, the Constitution no longer protects speech. It protects only speech delivered to calm, agreeable audiences.
Congratulations ... you have just handed the angriest person in the room veto power over everyone else’s mouth.
That is not a minor loophole. It is a loaded weapon.
Today, the taboo word is a racial slur. Tomorrow, it is “terrorist sympathizer,” “baby killer,” “groomer,” “fascist,” “bigot,” or any political insult someone claims made violence likely.
The rule will never remain confined to people you despise. Government power does not come with a factory-installed ideological safety lock.
And look at the facts here: Sharmake Omar filmed Hendrix, pressed her to repeat the slur, stayed calm, and promised the internet would judge her. Yet the state somehow transformed that into “fighting words” ... a doctrine the Supreme Court has not used to uphold a conviction in roughly 80 years.
That is not protecting the peace. It is rewarding provocation and criminalizing the response.
Once the audience controls the boundaries of speech, activists will learn the obvious trick: act threatened, claim possible violence, and summon the state.
The First Amendment cannot survive as a permission slip issued by the most offended listener.
Because when outrage becomes a veto, free speech becomes whatever the mob allows.
(article below)
Protesting in support of illegals and those who died trying to harm ICE agents for doing their jobs doesn’t make you a social justice warrior.
It makes you a lawless idiot.
The story most never heard or forgot...
In the early 1990s the House of Representatives ran its own bank and post office. Members of Congress could write checks with no money in their accounts. Hundreds of them did. Overdrafts. Thousands of them. Some for tens of thousands of dollars.
Don't ask how long this went on for... you do not want to know.
No interest charged. No real consequences. In fact, they were covering for each other regardless of party and the first hint of the uni-party was revealed to the public.
When the story finally broke, a few were embarrassed. Most were not. The bank was quietly closed. The names faded. The practice of treating public office like a private club continued.
That was not the biggest scandal in Congress. It was simply one of the few that made it into the papers.
The real scandal is how many never did.
And now you know.
What other quiet arrangements do you think still exist on Capitol Hill?