Funded Squad is a major fraudulent firm; it only makes payouts to influencers. When you start receiving consistent payouts from them, the firm rejects the payout and blocks you. Do not choose Funded Squad at all; your money, time, and hard work will all go to waste. Be careful 🚨
🚨 $1,599 WITHDRAWAL DISPUTE 🚨
Trader @javrefx says his $1,599.20 withdrawal from FundedSquad was rejected after a risk review, with the firm allegedly citing “copy trading.”
He denies copying another trader.
According to the trader, FundedSquad provided an Excel sheet showing allegedly matching trades and timestamps. He disputes that this alone proves copy trading and says he requested the other account’s trade history or identifying evidence for an independent comparison.
26 days later, he says he still hasn’t received that information.
Notably, the rejection email screenshot only says the withdrawal “could not be processed at this time” following a risk-team review. It does not mention copy trading or specify the alleged rule violation.
FundedSquad’s published rules reportedly allow copying between a trader’s own accounts, while prohibiting third-party copy trading and signal-based trading.
Based on the screenshots alone, it’s not possible to independently establish whether a rule was actually breached.
The key question is simple:
What evidence demonstrates that these trades were copied from a third party?
If FundedSquad has identified a matching account, providing appropriately redacted trade records could clarify the basis for the decision.
$1,599 rejected. Copy trading alleged. Evidence disputed.
@fundedsquad@ajwadthefalcon
Funded Squad is a major fraudulent firm; it only makes payouts to influencers. When you start receiving consistent payouts from them, the firm rejects the payout and blocks you. Do not choose Funded Squad at all; your money, time, and hard work will all go to waste. Be careful 🚨
🚨 @FundedSquad WHAT IS GOING ON?
Two traders. Two payout rejections.
@Mithun_Mindset says his $4,500 payout was rejected for “coordinated trading.”
@javrefx says his $1,599.20 payout was rejected for alleged copy trading.
That’s $6,099.20 in disputed payouts.
Both cases have rejection emails.
But where’s the actual evidence behind these decisions?
Trade matches. Data. Exact rule. Full explanation.
@ajwadthefalcon, you’re the CEO. What’s the explanation here?
@PropFirmGuru@PropFirmEye@PropFirmEdge take a look at this too.
If the evidence is there, show it.
We’re watching.
#PropFirm #Trading #Payout
Funded Squad is a major fraudulent firm; it only makes payouts to influencers. When you start receiving consistent payouts from them, the firm rejects the payout and blocks you. Do not choose Funded Squad at all; your money, time, and hard work will all go to waste. Be careful 🚨
🚨 $1,599 PAYOUT DISPUTE — @fundedsquad
Trader @javrefx reports that his $1,599.20 withdrawal was declined following a risk-team review.
The firm allegedly raised concerns about unauthorized trade duplication, which the trader strongly disputes.
According to @javrefx, FundedSquad shared a spreadsheet highlighting trades that were considered similar, including their timestamps. The trader says he asked for additional information about the account allegedly linked to those trades so he could properly review and challenge the finding.
He claims that 26 days have now passed without receiving the requested account-level evidence.
There is also a discrepancy between the explanation and the rejection notice shared by the trader. The withdrawal email only states that the request “could not be processed at this time” following a risk review, without clearly identifying the alleged violation in the screenshot.
FundedSquad’s rules reportedly distinguish between permitted trading across a trader’s own accounts and prohibited activity involving third-party trading or signals.
At this stage, the available screenshots do not independently establish what caused the alleged match or whether a prohibited rule was actually breached.
The unanswered question:
What specific evidence connects the trader to the alleged external account?
If such an account was identified, appropriately redacted records could help clarify the reason behind the payout decision.
⚠️ $1,599 withdrawal rejected. Trader disputes the finding. Evidence still requested.
@ajwadthefalcon
@fundedsquad@ajwadthefalcon Funded Squad is a major fraudulent firm; it only makes payouts to influencers. When you start receiving consistent payouts from them, the firm rejects the payout and blocks you. Do not choose Funded Squad at all; your money, time, and hard work will all go to waste. Be careful 🚨
Funded Squad is a major fraudulent firm; it only makes payouts to influencers. When you start receiving consistent payouts from them, the firm rejects the payout and blocks you. Do not choose Funded Squad at all; your money, time, and hard work will all go to waste. Be careful 🚨
🚨$1,599 Withdrawal Rejected by FundedSquad — Alleging so called rule “Copy Trading”Raises Questions 🚨
No valid reason has been provided by the FundedSquad team so far, even after 26 days.
According to trader @javrefx his $1,599.20 withdrawal from FundedSquad was rejected after a risk review.
According to the trader:
FundedSquad allegedly told him the account was blocked for “copy trading.”
He denies copying another trader’s trades.
When he requested evidence, he says the firm provided an Excel sheet showing allegedly matching trades and timestamps.
The trader disputes that this proves copy trading and says he has asked FundedSquad to provide the other trader’s MT5 history or identifying information so the trades can be independently compared.
He says he has received no further response to that request.
The screenshot of the rejection email itself only states that the withdrawal “could not be processed at this time” after review by the risk team; it does not state the copy-trading allegation or the specific rule allegedly breached.
FundedSquad’s published rules currently allow copy trading between a trader’s own accounts, including accounts at another prop firm, but prohibit third-party copy trading and signal-based trading. The firm says suspicious copy-trading activity can be reviewed and can lead to disqualification.
So was the breach actually valid?
Based only on these screenshots, there isn’t enough evidence to independently establish that the trader broke the rule. An Excel list of matching trades could be evidence for a risk review, but the key question is whether those similarities demonstrate actual copying under FundedSquad’s rules.
At the same time, the trader’s denial alone doesn’t prove that no copying occurred.
The missing piece is transparent evidence:
If FundedSquad has identified another account whose trades allegedly match, showing the relevant trade records with appropriate privacy protections would make the basis for the decision much easier to assess.
$1,599 rejected. Copy trading alleged. Evidence disputed.
The question now is whether this was a genuine rule violation or a risk-review/technical detection issue that needs clarification from the firm.
@fundedsquad@ajwadthefalcon
🚨 EXPOSING @Pipstonecapital : $3,800 PAYOUT DENIED & ACCOUNT TERMINATED 🚨
I bought a $100k evaluation account from Pipstone Capital for $699. I passed the evaluation fair and square, earned a funded account, and generated a legitimate $3,800 profit.
When I requested my payout, Pipstone Capital put me through a 1+ hour grilling interview. I answered every single question with full transparency and provided complete trading history—showing zero rule breaches or suspicious activity.
Despite this, Pipstone Capital:
❌ Denied my $3,800 payout
❌ Terminated my funded account
❌ Refused to refund my $699 evaluation fee
The interview felt like a clear delay tactic to reject a legitimate payout and keep my money.
I am calling on @AirRaja to personally look into this matter, review my trading history, restore my funded account, and approve my earned payout of $3,800.
Traders deserve transparency and fairness.
@Pipstonecapital@AirRaja@TrustedPropHub
👇 Screenshots of my trading history, payout request, and proof attached.
I am warning everyone ⚠️ to stay away from 'Funded Squad' and not fall for their schemes; it is certain that they will defraud you—100%. Please spread awareness among others as well. Thank you.@fundedsquad@ajwadthefalcon@Trustpilot@PropFirmMatch@elonmusk
Last time too, you said it would take 24 hours, then said it would arrive in 6 days, but it actually took 15 days to issue the refund. Your service is extremely sluggish, and you are doing the exact same thing again this time.@fundedsquad@ajwadthefalcon
How much longer do we have to wait? You are harassing traders. If you are afraid to issue payouts, then just shut down your company; this clearly isn't something you can handle.@ajwadthefalcon@fundedsquad
You do make payments for small amounts, but whenever you have to pay a larger sum, you make excuses to avoid doing so. If you continue this behavior, you will eventually be forced to shut down your company. I urge you not to deceive anyone or let anyone's hard work go to waste.
@ajwadthefalcon@fundedsquad Whenever you speak to their chat support, they just keep saying the same thing—that your case is already with the review team; their work is incredibly sluggish.
@ajwadthefalcon Probfirm ki duniya me funded squad sabse jyada payout reject karne bala firm hai vo bhi galat reason batake ki copy trade hua hai chuthya banate hai ye