@CornejoForMO FWIW: maybe no crime here, but I think there’s civil liability - intrusion upon seclusion for certain, also publication of private facts and misppropriation of name or likeness. Also, very ironic last paragraph.
@JChipmanMO120th @KurtEricksonPD@phlchristo I'm against this no matter what its source - whether cash-in-a-bag or money-washing (c)(4)s. This shouldn't be a partisan issue. To go back to where we started, the only point I wanted to make here: mega-donors who give through c4s are cowards.
@KurtEricksonPD@phlchristo Like, in theory, someone could use a fake 501(c)(4) to hide pay-for-play contributions from public scrutiny. Or, in theory, they could use it to evade campaign finance laws altogether? Wait a second ...
Who said it Part II? “I do not look forward to a society which ... campaigns anonymously, ... hidden from public scrutiny and protected from ... criticism. This does not resemble the Home of the Brave.” @phlchristo
@phlchristo Hold on, wasn't even talking about legislation. First tweet was about sympathy for mega-donors who 'choose to use c4s.' The small donors of which you speak aren't giving to those orgs so they can avoid 'bullying' - whatever that means.
@phlchristo Straw-man: Don't confuse small donors to long-standing issue organizations with mega-donors who wash their money through 501c4s of their own creation to avoid scrutiny. I repeat: the mega-donors who wash money are cowards.
Agree w/ Tony. Let kids be kids - not quasi-professionals. And fwiw, not stated by Tony, but its good for kids to get their butts kicked every once in a while! Sports should build character, not the opposite. https://t.co/ADpbkjLztO
When you consider every political opponent a traitorous, corrupt, deplorable, unworthy human being, you devalue humanity and damage support for our institutions of government. Please stop - all of you!