JayBone

[JayBone @jaybone_mc]

@JackieD86388657 @benhabib6 @SarahAMC72 @RestoreBritain When going into a high risk negotiation, in a high risk scenario, to form a favourable outcome - Aim high, gain meaningful leverage, negotiate aggressively.. dismiss neigh-sayers.

Politics that just vibe from issue to issue is not sustainable - concrete foundations are.

[JayBone @jaybone_mc]

@Mara_Webster When you have to guff and hide it, you have to hide it.

[JayBone @jaybone_mc]

@real_shirelass Sm!
What do you think of EM Burlingame?
Hes just done a chat on the Rich does politics channel.
Ever since listening to the crown executive (institution) held under duress since 1600s with the Praetorian guard issue - flag upside down.

A series of shows back, fills in gaps.

[JayBone @jaybone_mc]

@SPREADtheCimLUV @TRobinsonNewEra I suppose its reciprocated with the same respect and discovery in orthodox Muslim faith schools, to come along to an Anglican church or a mosque and take part in church or synagogue rituals too yeah? Photos, reports?

Answer: its doesn't happen.... shows weakness..

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿. @__777____777__]

@overlandertheb1 The English have a Constitution, Magna carta, and various other custom laws even ive never heard of the British have nothing, nothing but a political union which will eventually be destroyed by the very Constitution you deny, have a nice day.

[JayBone @jaybone_mc]

@priyanka2bharti He's a rightful king - up through the house of Stewart. He's making sure the things that have messed the workd up over the past few centuries are disbanded. No other country could have done that.

Soverign Patriots around the world - not just Americans, have facilitated this.

[JayBone @jaybone_mc]

@real_shirelass Didn't DJT skip the 2026 US CPAC?

[JayBone @jaybone_mc]

@benonwine 100% it represents the struggle for the natural law bedrock that this country was built over centuries.

[JayBone @jaybone_mc]

@reddiebaggie @benonwine Inside of a 7 second video with stripped back context? Not acceptable at all, it looks like someone needs a slap. Surely the video is longer, and we know this is the season of knee jerk reactions, so generally I wait to see what extra comes, and question presentation more.

[JayBone @jaybone_mc]

@GuntherEagleman No. Free speech maximalism means as uncomfortable as it is, you have to be reasonable and firm in logic to combat silly opinions.

Removing someone's right to say something is a slippery slope and is only a short-term and irresponsible fix

[JayBone @jaybone_mc]

@GuntherEagleman @Gutfeldfox @JessicaTarlov But the thing is, @greg_gutfield is still wrong about this case.
Calling is closed "done job we got a confession" is spineless and a rush-job.
This is a job not done, Greg. Too many things that dont make sense.
Listen to your own people.
Job not done....

[JayBone @jaybone_mc]

@simple_schmoe @DDHReynolds @I_Am_JohnCullen @IV_Musketeer Watching a show yesterday w/follow up analysis, the viewership of the show has been asked to identify figures further than the two roles (hand signal makers), at 1500 from Charlie in white Tee, with surrounding figures requested, in 'ideal conceal inc' fashion. Video isn't clear

[Katherine@EyesOpen😎🔥🙏 @TheBeanEyesOpen]

🙏♥️🙏

[DahmnSon.eth @DahmnSon1]

Pastor Jack Hibbs

Benjamin Netanyahu via Israeli news announced that Charlie Kirk had been assassinated 20 minutes after the shooting. This was before any American news source AND Donald Trump’s announcement. The American announcements are rolling in while Pastor Hibbs is making these videos. How did they know so soon?

He will be live on Fox News later today.

Link to his post and video: https://t.co/j9s5UdRxhi

[JayBone @jaybone_mc]

@real_shirelass Not only that. Don't we have tents ready to go up for a mass casualty event to expect to require thousands of hospital beds in the next 6 months in UK and France? Putin seems to be signalling readiness, too. Alaska agreement go well? Thinking extra pragmatically atm.

[JayBone @jaybone_mc]

@elonmusk Whole heartedly.
One of the only based informed groups out there at the moment.

[JayBone @jaybone_mc]

@Jasmine @TuckerCNews So we have a flag flying movement with a bomberang effect and dissent to e.g. the eq act 2010 sec 149 - protected characteristics [Marx style grouping ideology]; a redefinition and flattening of our nations historical class identity - your focus here is "billionaire focus bad"?

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

Seeing it plainly at sixty.

I never imagined that, at the age of 60, I would find myself writing something like this.

For much of my life, I believed, as most of us do, that the institutions of this country, while imperfect, were at least guided by a baseline of honesty, integrity and accountability.

We grew up believing that the rule of law was the backbone of Britain: that police served the people, prosecutors acted independently and oversight bodies existed to protect the public when things went wrong.

But today, I see a very different reality
.
Through years of digging, filing reports, following evidence, and engaging directly with the authorities, I have come face-to-face with a system that appears increasingly insidious. Each response I’ve received, whether from police, prosecutors, or oversight bodies, paints a consistent picture: not of error or incompetence, but of deliberate obstruction, suppression and self-protection.

Police forces refusing to investigate well-evidenced allegations, hiding behind technicalities.

National guidance instructing officers to reject whole categories of complaints.

Prosecutors admitting they will not even look at material unless the very police under suspicion choose to hand it over.

Oversight bodies sending citizens in endless circles, back to the same authorities accused of wrongdoing.

The effect is a closed loop: allegations are buried at the point of entry, never reaching daylight. Justice becomes a façade, while the machinery of state shields itself from scrutiny.

At times, it has felt unreal. Like many others, I ask myself: How can this be happening in Britain, of all places?

But the evidence is there. Once you see the pattern, you cannot unsee it.

And if you, like me, feel that gnawing sense of disbelief - that moment when the ground shifts beneath you and you realise the trust you placed in institutions may have been misplaced, know this: you are not alone.

I share these reflections not to spread despair, but to shine light. There is strength in recognising truth together. The more of us who see plainly, the harder it becomes for institutions to hide behind their façades.

I have learned that clarity often comes later in life, when the noise falls away and the patterns become obvious.

At 60, I see the picture plainly now. It is sobering, sometimes overwhelming. But it is also galvanising. Because once you see, you cannot look away.

And once enough of us see, we cannot be ignored.

Ian

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

The engagements made by and on behalf of Ethical Approach UK are undertaken to safeguard and protect the public interest and fundamental constitutional issues.

Today, the Crown Prosecution Service @CPSUK replied to a formal submission of evidence concerning statutory breaches by the Metropolitan Police Service. Their response is stark:

“We are unable to consider the material contained within the link you have supplied. If the police decide to investigate… they can provide the CPS with such material."

This reply confirms something deeply troubling:

The CPS will not look at evidence unless it is handed to them by police.

If police choose to bury or “downgrade” evidence in breach of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (CPIA), the CPS remains blind.

Prosecutorial independence is reduced to dependency. Justice is outsourced to police discretion.

This is not a minor technical point. It goes to the heart of constitutional integrity. If police can suppress allegations of serious crime by labelling them “incidents” rather than crimes, then the CPS, by its own admission, will never see that material. That is how justice collapses, silently.

The CPS is now on notice: CPIA breaches at the investigative stage poison the prosecutorial process. Their refusal to even look at evidence places them in a position of complicity by omission.

Public trust demands better than this. Prosecutorial independence cannot be conditional on police willingness.

The Met may think it can bend definitions and bury files. Now however, the CPS has confirmed the result: a justice system rendered blind by choice.

This cannot stand.