Jay

I make things

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@NikTek I'm sorry, but the implementation of AI into everything is quite literally the future.

Just accept it.

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@grass Discord/community has been compromised with a "Core Team" member posting scam airdrop claim, posting in the 📢Announcements channel.

Beware, don't get scammed! ⚠️🚫

[Jay @jaydensrw]

Scam happening in your Discord, announcement keeps getting deleted and reposted. General chat is gone because people were warning.

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@Lukeedesigner Design literally has nothing to do with the brand/project/niche lol

Gotta love Claude designers

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@daman76752 Black text on those backgrounds is a bit criminal, why not white?

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@nerooeth Love your work, keep it up.

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@learnframer @framer GEMS - would love to see your processes and see how they compare with mine for improvements!

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@orinfitzgerald @learnframer Outstanding marketing Nandi. Count me in, “UNDERCOVER”.

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@learnframer TICKET

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@learnframer @framer PDF

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@AlbiaHossain They're both nice but application would depend on the rest of the site's color scheme, in my opinion:

(A) - Better on off-white (#F5F5F5 for example) background but wouldn't suit a dark scheme.

(B) - Better on a darker scheme or with neutral, desaturated, green brand-tone.

[Jay @jaydensrw]

Build something that actually solves a problem.

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@rezoundous I hope people stop with Claude Code SaaS web builders sometime soon - some are brilliant, some are redundant, some are just plain trash.

[Jay @jaydensrw]

https://t.co/XgAYV3eVbO

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@Septic_Sauce Crying over technology they don't understand lol

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@zaurkov @venturetwins Buddy I think you're taking it a bit too seriously lol

[Jay @jaydensrw]

DLSS 5 still got people in a twist I see 🤣

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@NMonpo @SynthPotato @digitalfoundry You're stupid and blocked https://t.co/BWGZnXQ9wN

[Georgian Avasilcutei @nimlot26]

After this whole debate about DLSS 5 I came to the conclusion that most of the people talking about it are completely unaware of what they don't know...they're on the peak of ignorance and don't even grasp how little they understand.

They just heard generative AI and like Pavlov's dog they just start drooling thinking it's the same shit as unethical slop image generators...for the love of Christ...go and educate yourself before raging on the internet for no reason.

DLLS 5 is not a prompt based generator...it's not creating stuff based on someone else's images and hallucinates results. It uses the information from the raster to build up a final render frame with the same information but with better lighting and shading...

I'll even give you an example on how much of an impact better shading and lighting has. This is a character I've worked on not long ago. On the left you have a raster render, with some bad shaders. On the right you have a render with raytrace on, a much better shader for both hair and skin. They don't even look like the same person...do they? This is what DLSS5 is doing....getting a result like the one on the right(tbh a lot better) at a smaller cost than actually rendering it.
Still the same geo, same textures, same light sources.

Some of you will go and say the one on the left is better and it's the artist's vision. It's not...it's just the artist's limitation due to shading and lighting constrains. Every single artist out there would love to get the right result in real time.

[Georgian Avasilcutei @nimlot26]

After this whole debate about DLSS 5 I came to the conclusion that most of the people talking about it are completely unaware of what they don't know...they're on the peak of ignorance and don't even grasp how little they understand.

They just heard generative AI and like Pavlov's dog they just start drooling thinking it's the same shit as unethical slop image generators...for the love of Christ...go and educate yourself before raging on the internet for no reason.

DLLS 5 is not a prompt based generator...it's not creating stuff based on someone else's images and hallucinates results. It uses the information from the raster to build up a final render frame with the same information but with better lighting and shading...

I'll even give you an example on how much of an impact better shading and lighting has. This is a character I've worked on not long ago. On the left you have a raster render, with some bad shaders. On the right you have a render with raytrace on, a much better shader for both hair and skin. They don't even look like the same person...do they? This is what DLSS5 is doing....getting a result like the one on the right(tbh a lot better) at a smaller cost than actually rendering it.
Still the same geo, same textures, same light sources.

Some of you will go and say the one on the left is better and it's the artist's vision. It's not...it's just the artist's limitation due to shading and lighting constrains. Every single artist out there would love to get the right result in real time.

[Jay @jaydensrw]

@Milkdawg67 @q_w_e_r_t_y_08 @itzjustdubzz @videotech @RockstarGames Can imagine as a 9-5 blue collar you aren't worried