Weird dream today: I was in Germany, saw a beautiful old church from a train platform, walked over to take photos and videos, then found out it was haunted. Seconds later, a ghost came out and started chasing me.
💀
i'm in love with this quote:
"if you're persistent, you'll get it. if you're consistent, you'll keep it. and if you're grateful, you'll attract more of it."
Hello monsoon, when are you coming to Pune?
It's too hot 🥵, I cannot sustain this much heat anymore, come quickly and cool down the city temperature and allow us to see beauty of nature
#indianmeteorlogicaldepartment#monsoon#raininpune#rain#elnino
HR: We lost the new hire today.
CEO: The one we poached from our competitor with double salary?
HR: Yes. She resigned after discovering the company uses cameras to track how many times employees blink per minute.
CEO: I do not see the issue. These systems help us verify attendance, reduce time theft, manage remote teams, and spot performance problems earlier.
HR: That may be the intention, but that is not how she experienced it.
CEO: We are trying to ensure people are actually working.
HR: But “active” is not the same thing as “productive.”
CEO: Explain.
HR: A person can be doing deep work while typing very little, reading, thinking, designing, planning, or simply taking a necessary pause.
CEO: Still, we need visibility.
HR: Visibility into outputs is one thing. Tracking attention itself is another.
CEO: What do you mean?
HR: Once employers stop asking, “Did the work get done well?” and start asking, “Were your eyes on the screen every minute?” it becomes invasive.
CEO: So the blink tracking was the problem?
HR: Yes. Blink counts, webcam snapshots, and idle-time scores do not feel like management. They feel like surveillance.
CEO: Even with double salary, she still left.
HR: Because higher pay can attract talent, but it cannot make people stay where trust has been replaced by monitoring.