John Hamilton

Balanced, reasonable, rational, analytical, authentic, principled. Good-faith discussion and debate welcomed. UK based.

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

@iluv_papi It’s doubtful that she was even attacked at all! A physical injury sufficient to cause this degree of swelling would also causes lacerations and bruising. She has swelling only with intact skin - far more consistent with infection - maybe erysipelas.

IMO: All hateful lies!

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

@JohnCleese To be fair, i think it would be more accurate to say ‘condones’, rather than demands, and i don’t think there is any instruction for fgm. Other than that though - I think your assertion’s are irrefutable.

[Mrs B @attackdogX]

@Keir_Starmer

[Ian Miller @ianmSC]

Remember, Bluesky was created because the political left said Elon Musk was allowing "hateful rhetoric" to spread on Twitter/X

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

@AFpost I denounce this.

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

@MikeyBee45 @realDonaldTrump That’s a very favourable interpretation - I hope you’re right!

I assume that if he does break the law the we will agree to condemn it! :)

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

@realDonaldTrump *If* the law is wrong, there is due process, with checks and balances, by which it can be changed. This process is necessarily arduous.

The law must apply to everyone always, or else it is undermined at its very core.

(2/2)

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

@realDonaldTrump Disagree. Factually wrong, and a dangerous sentiment.

Even *if* ignoring the law would do good in some specific short term situation, adopting the principle that it can be ignored at the discretion of the president will likely lead to immeasurable evil in the long run.

(1/2)

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

@krassenstein @realDonaldTrump A rare @krassenstein post that I agree with

[Died Suddenly @DiedSuddenly_]

DEVELOPING: France has passed a new law which will send you to jail for 3 years if you criticize mRNA ‘vaccines’ or ‘gene therapy’

According to the law, which was passed quietly and secretly through the French parliament on Wednesday, advisement against mRNA or other treatments which are deemed ‘suitable’ based on current ‘medical knowledge’ can lead to a 3 year prison sentence and up to a $48,400 fine.

Article 4 of the new law, or Article Pfizer as it’s being referred to by freedom fighters in the legislature, is a prejudgment of “alternative medicine” and a threat to whistleblowers.

Ominously, during what little debate was fielded before the passage of this fascist law that eliminates informed consent, warnings were parroted that “the next pandemic is coming” and mRNA technology is the only solution.

What are they planning for the world?

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

@ianmiles No. IMO: principle of bodily autonomy stands even for criminals. The punishment for crime is loss of liberty, not loss of bodily autonomy.

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

@asda Yum - looks good.

[Jeremy Boreing @JeremyDBoreing]

This red-pill attack on marriage is evil.

Divorce is also evil. No-fault divorce is particularly evil. Divorce when children are in the picture is one of the most evil acts a person can engage in.

All of these acts of evil are common because evil is common and we are all given to it from time-to-time. But that does not change what they are.

The fact women initiate 80% of divorce is evidence that some manifestations of evil are more common in women - something society, and frustratingly Christian society, has been trying to obscure since we turned over all of our moral authority to women in the twentieth century.

It is also evidence of a deep societal sickness - one that creates enormous incentives for women to divorce and virtually (though not absolutely) none for men.

The red-pilled rightly observe much of this sickness. They even rightly diagnose much of it.

But then they turn on the institution itself - an institution fundamental to human flourishing, male flourishing, the flourishing of children and the flourish of society. An institution that is, when rightly ordered, the great metaphor for our relationship with Christ.

Marriage makes men men. Marriage saves men and is a picture of the salvation of men.

We should fight to make marriage marriage. We must defend men’s rights in marriage.

But we must not abandon marriage.

To abandon marriage is to abandon the fight beneath the fight - the fight on which all other fights are premised.

Anti-marriage is anti-life.

You cannot be conservative and anti-marriage.

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

https://t.co/dgnvNAQTVP

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

@EdKrassen Agreed

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

@EdKrassen Not absurd imo. Rather, on balance, wrong. Agreed that principles of freedom should take precedence, and state involvement should be absent/minimal.

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

@OnjaliRauf @sharrond62 @bindelj Enough of them … to justify the existence if female only spaces? Agreed.

Now we need to establish exactly what female means.

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

@MarinaPurkiss I’m afraid that it sounds exactly like democracy to me!

[John Hamilton @jcwh20]

@WomenReadWomen @SamBarber1910 “… or other problems”. This is a composite endpoint. It makes the 97.5% statistic meaningless.

The 10x statistic is relative, not absolute. The absolute number is likely still negligibly small.

I also have concerns, but statistics must be interpreted carefully.

[Xaviaer DuRousseau @XAVIAER]

“Black National Anthem” is an oxymoron. We are ONE nation under God. If you think otherwise, you’re in support of segregation. It’s that simple.