Janardan Gaur

don't follow stupids

[Janardan Gaur @jdgaur]

@Livpure_India Disappointed with your after-sales service. It's been 4 days since I raised my complaint, and despite multiple calls to the customer care, the issue remains unresolved. This level of customer support is pathetic. Kindly look into this and resolve my complaint.

[stockbee @PradeepBonde]

New information shatters old beliefs. Deep dive is one technique. Checking if the information is really true helps.

[stockbee @PradeepBonde]

All setups are living things; they evolve as you trade them or as someone else looks at them and offers improvements. There is continuous refinement based on trading. Entries, exits, sizing, stops, all get refined or you create a subsetup or variation.

[stockbee @PradeepBonde]

Pyramiding works in trend following not in swings of 3 to 5 days

[Janardan Gaur @jdgaur]

@Goldforestinves Yes!

[Chhirag Kedia @swing_ka_sultan]

If I had to summarize all of chart reading into just two things, I would say focus only on these:

a) Characteristics: What is the stock doing? Are the bulls in control or the bears? What is the quality of the trend? Is it clean, choppy, strong, or weakening?

b) Change in Characteristics: Is there any visible change from what was previously observed? Is control shifting from bears to bulls or vice versa? Is a choppy trend becoming cleaner? Is there anything unusual that is attracting your attention?

None of these are new concepts. Their roots can be traced back to Wyckoff, or perhaps even further before him. Wyckoff used the concept of "Change in Behavior" extensively. Unfortunately, many of his followers failed to do justice to his work and turned it into a game of pattern matching, the very thing he criticized in his writings.

Darvas explained the same idea through a fascinating analogy:

"If a tempestuous beauty were to jump on a table and do a wild dance, no one would be particularly astonished. That is the sort of characteristic behavior people have come to expect from her. But if a dignified matron were suddenly to do the same, this would be unusual and people would immediately say, 'There is something strange here—something has happened.' "

[Chhirag Kedia @swing_ka_sultan]

You are missing the point here, Yash.

Linearity is a characteristic. A stock becoming more or less linear is a change in characteristics.

Liquidity zones can be viewed as one of the mechanisms through which characteristics change.

Risk management is execution, not chart reading.

As I often say, chart reading is not trading. Chart reading is figuring out whether the vehicle in front of you is a Maruti 800 or a Ferrari. Trading is about how you are going to drive that vehicle, for what purpose, on which track, and at what speed.

Trading involves many additional dimensions: execution tactics, stop-loss placement, position sizing, trade management, letting go, and much more. You also need to evaluate how your decisions and positioning serve your objectives, goals, and long-term vision. Most people miss this aspect and spend years doing things that do not move the needle.

Risk management is like wearing a seat belt. Seat belts and airbags are important, but they are not equivalent to driving the Ferrari or the Maruti 800.

Much of the excessive emphasis on risk management is directed toward novice and undisciplined traders who are driven by emotions and place too much importance on a single event, the outcome of one trade, rather than seeing it as a small part of a much larger process.

A shield is not a sword. Once you learn how to use the shield, it becomes equally important to learn how to use the sword.

[Jeff Sun, CFTe @jfsrev]

Outsized performance isn’t driven by trade selection alone—it comes down to these four principles, which have a far greater impact on your results than simply being right on a few trades.

Two traders can run the exact same ideas over a full year and still end up with drastically different outcomes—anywhere from +30% to +500% on the same set of trades.

The gap comes down to

1. Execution Quality — the same idea traded to the same exit price can be a 3R vs 10R difference on the same 1R loss. You multiply that by one full year of trade execution. Optimal entry is very important to me, and if you’re subscribed, you’ll know how strict I am about what qualifies as an actionable setup. I am very sure this is the biggest takeaway from the community how entry quality can define your performance in just under 2 weeks (avoiding stop losses specifically).

2. Dynamic Risk as a % of Equity — which drives position sizing and it has to be anchored dynamically to your streak. you can't possibly be trading the same % risk when you are on a downswing, and running the same % risk when market has rewarded your diligence and situational awareness),

3. Capital efficiency — and the ability to compound within a single idea enhanced through leveraged ETFs versus outright stock exposure ( 3x ETF has positive compounding that give you more than 3x return at 33% of the capital required when trend eg. $SOXX +54% vs $SOXL +211% in 42 days)

4. Sell rules — minimizing loss size when wrong ((a stop loss should not be fixated to -1R. It can be done much less than that eg. -0.67R per loss) while maximizing gains when right (are you willing to part some shares to sell at strength on your most eutrophic winner that makes u feel great that day? how controlled are your unrealized profit loss per trade to your final exit?)

Don’t keep repeating the same approach if it isn’t producing the results you want. Use the four rules above as a framework, backtest them against your trading data over the past few years, and review the outcome. You may gain clarity on the direction you need to take next.

https://t.co/0F5tgGM49z

[Nick Schmidt @NickSchmidt]

I learned to step away because there’s no other option. It is impossible to watch the market all day & not place a trade. Just like social media is designed to keep u scrolling, the market is designed to keep u clicking buttons.

I know myself and over the years I’ve tried to be disciplined in other ways but the only way I can actually stop overtrading is physically removing myself from watching the market while it’s open.

Everybody is afraid to step away because they might miss an opportunity and you can’t operate from that mindset.

That’s why yesterday I said most of being a good trader is just identifying when the market environment shifts. I’m still bullish, but after the day we had last Friday, there was no chance our friendly low volatility market was coming back without some time.

I think it will be back sooner than we think though and when that easy market is back I want to be thinking clearly and not digging myself out of a hole.

[Trading Composure @TradingComposur]

Stop intellectualizing everything.

When you get an entry signal, take it.

When your stop-loss is hit, get out.

That's it. That's all there is to it.

[Jeff Sun, CFTe @jfsrev]

Improving your performance often has nothing to do with finding the magic screener or indicator, but everything to do with mastering the space between your ears. I have some personal belief for structural non-negotiables for trading longevity and i am still trying to refine and improve them;

1. Patience is a Position, Improve your execution, improve your average holding period: The best traders aren't the ones clicking the most buttons; they are the ones waiting for the high-probability breakout to manifest. They are also the one that have the balls to hold beyond their predetermined stops if they have an unexplained conviction from their years of experience. A trader that could hold $STX from 2025 May 12th entry vs a trader entering and exiting $STX with multiple magnitude of wins, breakevens, and stops losses with latest hold from 2026 May 1st entry will speak volume of who has an enhanced skill set in this endeavor. Try to explore quantifiable ways to improve your avg holding period for winners without second guessing, first.

2. Systems Over Emotions: Discipline is following your stop loss and position sizing rules even when your ego wants to fight the tape. Yes I know it kinda contradicts point 1. above but that is what experience rewards you for the outlier performance through 'holding' on that 5 star trade with calculated risk in mind when other traders couldn't.

3. Focus on Relative Strength, Relative Strength Precedes Setup: Stop trying to catch every move and focus on the institutional inflow that drives true momentum. Some best trades only gives a single day pause before resuming it's rally without revisiting rising 10-MA. You need to be innovative enough to design a risk controlled trading plan around it.

5. The Power of Consistency: Wealth isn't built on one "lucky" trade; it’s built through a systematic approach that wins over hundreds of trades. How many times have you revisit your trading journal and go through the statistics in batches of hundred trades?

5. Habits Build the Equity Curve: Your daily routine—screening, journaling, and reviewing—shapes your future PnL more than any news headline. Our individual equity curve actually mimic like a stock chart. If you trade well even on streaks of controlled losses, it should actually reflect a basing pattern in your equity curve before your edge and alpha plays out in matter of time.

Trading is a performance sport. Focus on the longevity of your trading performance.

[Monis @mmonis]

Mean reversion is one of those quiet, built-in rules of the universe that shows up everywhere in nature, like gravity or the way water always finds its level.

At its heart, it's super simple: when something swings way too far from what's "normal" for it, the world tends to gently (or sometimes not-so-gently) pull it back toward its average over time.

Now in stocks - "The Mean" definition differs,
Some use MA, others rely on Fibs, a few prefer VWAP or AVWAP, and a few use standard deviation (Bollinger bands). The choice is yours

It is important to realize one of the most fundamental principles of nature, and the stock market is no different

[Matt Petrallia, CMT @theEquilibrium]

You can copy someone’s external framework, but not their internal wiring.

This is why personalization is REQUIRED in trading.

Here’s an uncomfortable truth: your edge is in how you interact with discomfort and uncertainty. Trading is both of these things - every. single. day.

Sitting out during a poor environment? That’s uncomfortable. Holding onto a volatile name as it runs on a key SMA? That’s extremely uncomfortable. Weathering the inevitable drawdowns while trying to adhere to your simple rules? DISCOMFORT.

There are dozens of examples. And they aren't "cured" by lines on a chart.

Everyone is different. Discomfort hits harder in some. You can condition yourself to handle the constant discomfort but you will never completely hide your personality. It will come out. Harness it, help it shine.

Rather than try and force yourself into a process suited to someone else’s personality, create one tailored to yours. Build rules that manage YOU, not someone else. That’s the only way you’ll be able to repeat that process, and edge, for years.

[Nitin R @finallynitin]

Unbecome

Stay alone. Get bored. Talk to yourself. Write. Discover what you really think when you are the only audience. Constant connectivity is the biggest enemy of original thought. Disconnect. Disappear.

Treat ideas like clothes. Try them. See if they fit. Discard them when they no longer serve the purpose. Separate the ideas from the person. Strip ideas to their core. Reject processed ideas. Consume them raw. Test. Observe. Unlearn. Update.

Let go of biases. Let go of attachments. Let go of the fear of being proven incorrect, being proven stupid, getting isolated. Welcome being wrong. The level of criticism you can take without defending yourself is the degree of your maturity.

Sit with uncertainty. Thinking starts at discomfort. Think. Read. Speak your heart. If you can’t say it, you don’t understand it. Teaching others is an even better way of learning.

Don’t assume conclusions. Don’t borrow convictions. Step outside the scene to understand it. Free yourself of concepts that bind you. Separate yourself from the labels that society uses to define you. Do not let your opinions become your identity.

You are not your profession. You are not your money, not your country, not your religion, not your family name. You are neither the story you keep telling yourself nor the version of you that society wants you to be.

Strip it all away. Your beliefs. Your past. Your trauma. Your achievements.

Strip it all away and ask what remains.

That. That remainder. That which quietly watches all of it come and go without becoming any of it.

That’s worth knowing.

But it’s highly unlikely that you’ll ever get there. Not because it’s hidden. But because the stripping away is uncomfortable. And society keeps handing you new things to wear.

[Leif Soreide @LeifSoreide]

When trading breakouts becomes increasingly more difficult it is often one of the earliest leading indicators of an impending market downturn.

If your go-to setups suddenly stop paying and start failing, it's usually a clear signal to tighten up risk, reduce size, or go to cash.

I've worked with many top-performing traders over the years, guys who crush it year after year, and this is one signal they all respect without exception. Breakouts don't randomly become more difficult. The market's telling you something's shifting beneath the surface.

Ignore it at your peril! Respect it and survive to trade another cycle.

What are you seeing in your own setups right now? 📊

[Trading Composure @TradingComposur]

Trading is not rocket science.

When a trend starts, it can continue for a while.

That's all you need to know.

Now, find a simple way to identify low-risk entry points, hop on board, and manage your expectations.

And prepare to be wrong a fair number of times.

That's it.

[Nistor Busuioc @nisttorr]

@TheOneLanceB As @PradeepBonde says. The setup will look the same in a good market and in a bad/choppy market.
Your job is to determine if there is a high likelihood of working or not.

[Suresh K @SureshKBN]

People don’t struggle to book losses because of conviction.

If it was truly their idea, they’d cut it without drama.
When you understand the thesis,
you also understand when it’s broken.

The real issue?
It was never their idea.
It was borrowed conviction.

Now selling means admitting they never had clarity.

So they hold.
Markets punish outsourced thinking.

[Suresh K @SureshKBN]

The biggest scam in town is is calling PEAD/ EP a “strategy” based only on earnings notifications.

If it was that simple, algos would have arbitraged it away long back.

Real edge is in context, positioning, and capital flow not notifications.

Context tells you where the company stands in its cycle:
Early rerating?
Peak margin?
Turnaround?
Structural compounding?

Positioning tells you who already owns the story.
Crowded trade ready to unwind?
Or under owned stock waiting for discovery?

Capital flow tells you what big money is doing after results.
Are dips getting bought?
Are supports defended?
Is size being built quietly?

[Janardan Gaur @jdgaur]

@grok @yajnshri Why is it important to burn sugar fast?