musica

[The White Rabbit Podcast @AllBiteNoBark88]

What a bollox word salad.
Just SAY IT

"EUROPE IS AT WAR WITH RUSSIA"

But you won't say it
Because no other peoples outside Ukraine have any reason to be at War with Russia so it is unsupported.

A WOMAN asking for Patriot Missiles to kill innocent people is NAZI in the extreme!

Russia has NATURAL GAS, OIL, RARE EARTH MINERALS, LITHIUM, COBALT.

THAT is why they want you to fight #Russia

[Matteo Matzuzzi @matteomatzuzzi]

Pensieri sparsi: ma come la mettiamo ora con quei vescovi italiani favorevoli alla legge sul fine vita "perché lo chiede la Consulta" quando il loro superiore (il Papa) ha detto – parlando di fine vita – che "ciò che è legale non è necessariamente morale"?

[Thomas Fazi @battleforeurope]

Fantastic piece!

“I argue that the United States is deliberately preparing to sacrifice Europe. When Ukrainian manpower is exhausted, European men and European territory are to become the next expendable resource in a proxy war against Russia.

For decades a networked elite has manipulated governments, manufactured consent for wars of aggression, and shielded itself from accountability through legal and institutional mechanisms designed for that purpose. That same elite now faces the collapse of its financial instruments, the failure of its traditional tools of control, and the rise of powers it can no longer dominate. It cannot afford to lose power, because loss of power would mean exposure for crimes that, under the standards established at Nuremberg, constitute the supreme international crime.

Europe’s own political class is not working for Europe’s interest. Its loyalty has been carefully cultivated to serve the American hegemon — more like a beaten wife than an equal partner. The continent is therefore being transformed from ally into resource: economically drained, politically captured, and militarily prepared as the theatre in which the costs of imperial decline will be paid. The ultimate expression of this strategy is a managed escalation that keeps the American homeland as sanctuary while Europe absorbs both the conventional attrition and the nuclear risk”.

Link to the article: https://t.co/8l41c02DM7

[George Galloway @georgegalloway]

Israel did this to Gaza

[Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald]

If you were Israeli leaders, and believed you were being globally accused of crimes you didn't commit in Gaza, what's the first thing you'd do?

Urge the international media to go to Gaza and report the truth.

But if you know the accusations are true, you'd ban international media from reporting freely. That's what Israel is doing even a year after a "cease-fire," and the reason could not be more obvious.

[Haitham in Gaza 🇵🇸🍉 @HaithamElmasri1]

This devastation represents only 50% of the immense scale of destruction that Israel has left behind here on the ground.

The full reality is far more horrific than anything that can be seen, described, or imagined.

[Fabio Franchi @FabioFranchi1]

VACCINO CONTRO L’HPV: QUALI SONO I RISULTATI?
L’inizio della vaccinazione estesa in Italia risale al 2008, ed interessate erano le fasce di età 11-12 anni (più adolescenti di qualsiasi età su base sempre volontaria). Quindi son già passati 18 anni: le prime a vaccinarsi ora hanno un’età di 29. Lo scopo della misura è – asseritamente - quello di conferire un’immunità per impedire l’attecchimento di un virus ritenuto la causa del tumore.
-> C’è stata una riduzione dell’incidenza da allora?
No, come potete vedere dal grafico (fig. 1, sulla base dei dati AIOM ed AIRTUM).
Nel contempo, la copertura vaccinale (fig. 2 e 3) è stata superiore al 64% per ogni scaglione d’età dal 2008.
Continua nel file completo: https://t.co/QckseE5xe1

[“Sudden And Unexpected” @toobaffled]

Mom has stated everything began after her sons one year vaccinations 💉

I NEED HELP. PLEASE READ THIS. PLEASE SHARE THIS.

I am begging at this point. I’m begging someone, somewhere, to help me figure out what is happening to my baby.

My son is ONE YEAR OLD. He should be running around, laughing, playing, getting into everything, learning new things, and experiencing the world around him. Instead, we have watched our little boy change right in front of us.

He went from being awake, active, and himself to sleeping almost constantly.. day and night. He stares off into space. There are times when he doesn’t respond to us or seem aware of what is happening around him.

And the hardest part? WE STILL DON’T KNOW WHY.

We have had appointment after appointment. Specialist after specialist. Test after test. Twenty appointments. Five specialists. A 48-hour EEG. An MRI. Bloodwork. Sleep testing. Cardiology. Hearing testing. And so much more.

And somehow, after all of this, we are still sitting here with ZERO ANSWERS.

The 48-hour EEG showed no seizure activity, but he is still having these staring spells where he becomes unresponsive. We were told they are “awakeness awareness” spells, and when I asked what that meant, I was literally told, “I DON’T KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS.”

How am I supposed to accept that? How am I supposed to take my baby home and just be okay with “everything is normal” when my child is NOT acting normal?

Something is wrong. I know my child. A test result might say “normal,” but that doesn’t magically make what we are seeing disappear.

We have now also found a confirmed hearing problem, and we still don’t know how severe it is. He has also had heart rhythm abnormalities that cardiology is monitoring. Every appointment seems to uncover something else, but somehow we are still no closer to understanding the WHY.

And I am exhausted.

I am exhausted from watching my baby sleep his life away. I am exhausted from watching him stare into space and wondering what is happening inside his head. I am exhausted from explaining the same symptoms over and over again to another doctor. I am exhausted from hearing that tests are “normal” when my baby is clearly telling us something isn’t right.

Most of all, I’m exhausted from having to fight so hard just to get someone to listen.

So I’m asking for something different.

I’M ASKING THE INTERNET FOR HELP.

I am NOT asking anyone to diagnose my son. I am asking if ANYONE has seen something similar.

Has your child ever experienced extreme sleepiness, staring or unresponsive episodes, sudden changes in behaviour or development, hearing problems, heart rhythm issues, or a combination of symptoms that doctors struggled to explain?

Did your child eventually get a diagnosis? Was there a specialist who finally connected the dots? Was there a test that you should have been asking about?

Please tell me.

Even if you think your experience sounds completely unrelated, please comment. You never know what tiny piece of information could lead us to the person who finally knows what is happening.

And if you don’t have advice, PLEASE SHARE THIS.

Share it with your friends. Share it with nurses, doctors, therapists, parents — anyone you think might have an answer.

Because somewhere out there, there may be another parent who has been through this. Somewhere out there may be a doctor who has seen this before.

I just need to find them.

I don’t want attention. I don’t want sympathy.

I WANT ANSWERS FOR MY BABY.

I am going to keep fighting for him until someone finally listens.

Please help me find the person who can help my son. ❤️‍🩹

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

University debate, "Were humans built to eat meat?", same two chairs, same clock.

Vegan: "Anatomically we're closer to the gorilla than the lion. Flat molars, long gut. A gentle plant-eater with delusions."

Paleoanthropologist: "Then explain the acid."

Vegan: "Which acid?"

Paleoanthropologist: "Your stomach runs at a pH of about 1.5. A lion's sits nearer 3.6. Yours is stronger than the animal you've just been contrasted with, by a factor of about a hundred."

Vegan: "Stomach acid digests food."

Paleoanthropologist: "A cow's rumen sits at about 6.5. That's a compost heap with a pulse. Yours strips the zinc off a coin. Why would a gentle plant-eater carry that?"

Vegan: "Protection."

Paleoanthropologist: "From what? Lettuce doesn't fight back."

Vegan: "Bacteria."

Paleoanthropologist: "Which bacteria live in a leaf at a level that needs a pH of 1.5? Name the salad."

Vegan: "..."

Paleoanthropologist: "The animals that run acid as low as ours are the scavengers. Vultures. Things that arrive at a carcass on the second day and need to kill what's already living in it. We're not built like the lion. We're built like the bird that waits for the lion to finish."

Vegan: "Flattering."

Paleoanthropologist: "It's a picture of a species with a rock, a sharp flake and no claws. You don't get the fresh kill. You get the femur nobody could open, forty hours late, and you'd better have the acid for it."

Vegan: "Acid that strong is dangerous. Look how many people are on tablets for it."

Paleoanthropologist: "The only animal on earth that pays to switch its stomach off. You've spent sixty years pouring cereal onto a carcass digester and now you're medicating the digester for doing its job."

Vegan: "So your argument is that we're vultures."

Paleoanthropologist: "My argument is a number. Yours is a feeling about gorillas. The gorilla eats for most of the day and its gut is a fermentation tank. Yours is done in a few hours and runs on acid. One of you is designed for leaves."

Moderator: "Thirty seconds."

Paleoanthropologist: "She can keep them. I'm still waiting on the salad."

[American Anne @Anne8065]

This is Kathy Hochul's side of New York State and she fucking ruined it with her green new solar scam, taking money to subsidize this from your electric bills!

[Alex Fasulo @alex_fasulo]

You're looking at a drone shot of Byron, New York, where thousands of acres of solar panels have swallowed up a county that boasts the MOST amount of productive agricultural land in the entire state.

This is only a portion of the panels that have been anchored into Byron for Excelsior Solar.

With the newly announced Brusselville Solar on the ORES docket, this aerial view will only encompass a fraction of the total solar footprint.

Those responsible for this must be held accountable. This video should be on NATIONAL news.

We are going to lose our state and the land that feeds us very quickly if there is not immediate intervention.

This is dystopian, anti-human, catastrophic to wildlife, a direct threat to our future food autonomy, and the largest land grab of our American lifetimes from generational landowners to foreign corporations.

And it's all on purpose.

[Del Bigtree @delbigtree]

Send the patient home. Wait until their lips turn blue. Bring them in, put them in a coma, put them on a ventilator, and watch nine out of ten of them die. That was the official protocol, set by the WHO, the UN, and the United States government.

Meanwhile, the doctors who refused to follow it, the ones who kept the Hippocratic Oath and treated the patient in front of them with whatever actually worked, were getting twice the survival rate. And those are the doctors who lost their licenses. Every single one of them, shut down, for having the best outcomes in the world and refusing to stay quiet about it.

What we're left with is a medical establishment that purged its best doctors to protect a protocol that was killing nine out of ten people who followed it. That isn't a mistake. That is the greatest medical fraud that has ever taken place.

[Pierfilippo Fazio @Pierfil99385506]

Il prezzo d’ingresso è questo, e lo sanno tutti. Non lo dicono.
In Europa, su certe questioni, non si vince: si viene ammessi. L’estrema destra lo ha capito tardi, ma lo ha capito. Per sedersi al governo non basta il voto. Serve la conversione. E la conversione, oggi, ha un solo rito obbligatorio: la russofobia piena, liturgica, senza residui.
Il Rassemblement National ha appena compiuto il gesto. Ieri un comunicato. Prima volta. Le Pen e Bardella, dopo l’udienza all’Eliseo con i servizi, scoprono all’improvviso il confine con Mosca. Parlano di attacchi ibridi, di droni, di campagne contro «le nostre società e le nostre opinioni pubbliche», di una potenza straniera che non dovrà «dettare» la politica francese. Il lessico è quello del fronte. Non quello di chi, per anni, aveva detto — e aveva ragione a dirlo — che la politica francese ed europea in Ucraina era un suicidio strategico, un sanguinoso affare altrui pagato con industrie, energia, consenso.
Quelle critiche, ieri, sono state consegnate al macero. Non perché i fatti le abbiano smentite. Perché il palazzo le ha rese incompatibili con l’ambizione. Si può ancora «discutere» degli aiuti a Kiev, dicono. Ma il quadro è chiuso: la Russia è la minaccia, l’ibridità è il dogma, la fermezza è il biglietto. Chi non lo recita resta fuori. Non è un dibattito. È un esame di ammissione.
Giorgia Meloni ha già superato lo stesso esame. Prima i distinguo, i cenni alla «pace», la retorica sovranista. Poi il governo, e con il governo la linea. Non perché l’Atlantico sia improvvisamente diventato sacro. Perché in Europa, su quella questione, o ti allinei o il governo te lo sogni. Il cordone non è solo sui migranti o sui conti. È sulla guerra. Chi pretenda di governare senza firmare il catechismo russofobo scopre che i voti non bastano. Servono i garanti. I giornali «seri». Le cancellerie. I servizi. Il visto atlantico.
Chiamarla «evoluzione» è una cortesia. È un atto di resa. L’estrema destra europea ha passato anni a denunciare l’ipocrisia di Bruxelles, il costo della guerra per procura, la distruzione del tessuto produttivo, l’uso della paura come strumento di disciplina. Poi, arrivati alla soglia, hanno scoperto che quelle denunce erano un lusso da opposizione. Al governo si entra soltanto se si accetta di diventare, sulla Russia, ciò che prima si fingeva di disprezzare: un partito di guerra, o almeno un partito che recita la parte.
Non è coraggio. È calcolo. Non è lucidità. È opportunismo. La «minaccia ibrida» arriva comoda: è vaga, è inesauribile, è impossibile da falsificare. Serve a tutto. Serve a chiudere la bocca a chi chiede i costi. Serve a trasformare ogni dissenso in sospetto di connivenza. Serve, soprattutto, a certificare che il convertito è affidabile. Che non farà più lo spiritoso sulla «suicida politica europea». Che ha capito dove sta il potere vero.
Il paradosso è grottesco. Quelli che vendevano sovranità scoprono che la sovranità, in Europa, si esercita solo dopo aver giurato fedeltà alla linea di Washington e di Bruxelles sulla Russia. Quelli che gridavano al «regime» scoprono che il regime ha un solo tabù davvero intoccabile, e non è l’immigrazione: è Mosca. Su tutto il resto si tratta. Su quello no. O ci si posiziona, o si resta a fare i leoni da tastiera.
Le Pen lo ha fatto. Meloni lo ha già fatto. Altri lo faranno. Non perché la guerra in Ucraina sia diventata improvvisamente santa. Perché il governo, in questo continente, non si conquista: si ottiene. E il prezzo, per l’estrema destra, è diventare pienamente russofoba. Il resto è letteratura.

[Red Pill USA @Red_Pill_US]

They taught you Truman dropped two bombs to “save American lives.”

They never taught you he was already a high-ranking Freemason who got coronated 33rd Degree Scottish Rite on October 19, 1945, ten weeks after Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Nagasaki wasn’t just another industrial city. It was the heart of Japanese Christianity. Urakami Cathedral, the largest church in East Asia, sat almost on top of ground zero. Thousands of Japanese Catholics died in one flash. History books skip that part.

Truman had been Grand Master of Missouri while still a senator. The Craft was not a hobby. Then, right after the second mushroom cloud, the Supreme Council handed him the 33rd.

Standard textbooks mention the shipyards and the estimated invasion casualties. They do not mention the lodge or the cathedral.

It raises the question: would they still have pinned that 33rd on him if he hadn’t just vaporized Japan’s largest Christian community?

[Babbo di Giovanni @BabbodiGiovann1]

@minGiustizia APPELLO AI MAGISTRATI - PER LA VERITÀ E LA GIUSTIZIA PER GIOVANNI IANNELLI
Sono Carlo Iannelli, babbo di Giovanni Iannelli, ragazzo di 22 anni morto al termine di una gara ciclistica, a poco più di 100 metri dall'arrivo.
Con profondo rispetto per le istituzioni, mi rivolgo a voi Magistrati perché non si archivi questa morte senza un pieno accertamento.
Mio figlio è morto sull'asfalto. Il verbale di gara riportava la dicitura "nulla da segnalare". Una dicitura che, come padre, non riesco ad accettare e che chiedo sia oggetto di verifica.
Nel corso delle indagini ho maturato gravi perplessità:
•sulla completezza delle dichiarazioni rese e acquisite agli atti;
•sulla veridicità di alcune testimonianze;
•sulla consulenza tecnica disposta dalla Procura di Alessandria e sulle sue conclusioni;
•sulla decisione finale di archiviazione, che ha impedito lo svolgimento di un giusto processo penale in dibattimento, unica sede dove la verità può emergere in contraddittorio.
Non chiedo condanne, chiedo un processo. Non chiedo vendetta, chiedo verità.
Chiedo che la morte di un ragazzo di 22 anni, avvenuta in una manifestazione sportiva, non venga archiviata come un banale fatto di corsa privo di profili da approfondire.
Chiedo che la Procura Generale, il CSM, il Ministero vogliano disporre le valutazioni di competenza per verificare se vi siano stati profili di incompletezza o di errore nelle indagini che hanno portato all'archiviazione disposta dalla Procura della Repubblica di Alessandria.
Lo chiedo per Giovanni. Lo chiedo per tutti i ragazzi che corrono in bicicletta e per le loro famiglie, perché la sicurezza sia davvero garantita.
Con fiducia nella Magistratura e nello Stato di Diritto.
Carlo Iannelli - babbo di Giovanni
#VeritàEGiustiziaPerGiovanniIannelli #SicurezzaPerTutti

[Ali Abunimah @AliAbunimah]

On the same day @netanyahu, the fugitive co-murderer of Minab’s schoolgirls, is allowed to overfly Greece, France, Italy and Canada, Iranian civilians are denied overflight rights solely for being Iranian.

[Ihtesham Ali @ihteshamali]

Bloomberg just dropped the most disturbing investigation I have read this year, and every AI builder should read it and take it seriously.

On February 28, two Tomahawk missiles hit an elementary school in Minab, a small town in southern Iran. 156 people died. At least 123 were children. The Pentagon knew within hours that it had bombed a school.

The school had its own website. It was labeled on Google Maps. You could see the soccer pitch from a satellite view. You could see the brightly painted walls. Any 12-year-old with a browser could tell what the building was.

The AI system could not.

Inside US Central Command, personnel were using Palantir's Maven Smart System. It is an AI targeting platform running on a $1.3 billion Pentagon contract, and embedded inside it is Anthropic's Claude.

On day one of the war, more than 1,000 targets went through it in 24 hours. Work that used to take a team hours per target got compressed into minutes.

The satellite imagery Maven was pulling from was seven years old. The site was still tagged in the database as an Islamic Revolutionary Guard facility.

The system spat it out as a recommended day-one target. Humans signed off. The first missile flew. Then a second one landed minutes later to hit the people who came to help.

Investigators later found that some Central Command staff had assumed Maven would flag stale intelligence for them. It did not. Nobody had told it to.

Palantir told Bloomberg the government is responsible for the underlying data. The Pentagon's civilian harm mitigation team, the people whose actual job is to catch a target like this, had been cut back before the war started.

This is not AI going rogue. This is the opposite.

This is AI doing exactly what it was built to do at exactly the speed it was built to do it. And a school full of little girls got vaporized because the humans in the loop trusted the machine more than they trusted their own eyes.

I keep thinking about the version of this story that comes next. What happens when the system is faster. When the target list is not 1,000 in a day but 10,000. When "review" becomes a button the operator has three seconds to hit before the next target loads. When there is no human left slow enough to notice that a soccer pitch is not a helipad.

We are not talking about a spam filter mislabeling an email. We are talking about a system that turned a seven-year-old database entry into two cruise missiles landing on children in the middle of a morning class.

A UN-backed panel has now called it a potential war crime.

In terms of children killed, it is the deadliest American targeting error of the entire 21st century. And according to Bloomberg, some of Defense Secretary Hegseth's own advisors are worried that too much public scrutiny of Maven might slow down its adoption inside the Pentagon.

Read that last line again.

If you build this stuff, you own what it does. You do not get to hide behind "the government owns the data." The whole pitch of your product is that speed and integration save lives. When it takes them instead, that is also on you.

I am not against AI in defense. I am against AI in a hurry. Speed is the entire mechanism that made Minab possible. Every guardrail we already know how to build takes time, and time is exactly what the system was designed to eliminate.

So here is the question I have not been able to stop asking, and I genuinely want to know what you think.

If a piece of software helped kill 123 children in a single morning while behaving exactly as designed, what does "responsible AI" even mean anymore?

[Robin Monotti @robinmonotti]

I'm calling it: the coming "Russian" false flag "attack" "against" one or more NATO countries will fail. Nobody will believe it. There will be no war. Globalist politicians just want to steal Russian reserves before they are all voted out.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Je veux présenter mes excuses, au nom des Français, pour avoir enfanté la French Theory (qui a enfanté la pire des merdes idéologiques : le wokisme).

Nous avons donné au monde Descartes, Pascal, Tocqueville. Et puis, dans les ruines intellectuelles de l'après-68, nous avons donné Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze. Trois hommes brillants qui ont fabriqué, dans l'élégance de notre langue, l'arme idéologique qui paralyse aujourd'hui l'Occident.

Il faut comprendre ce qu'ils ont fait. Foucault a enseigné que la vérité n'existe pas, qu'il n'y a que des rapports de pouvoir déguisés en savoir. Que la science, la raison, la justice, l'institution médicale, l'école, la prison, la sexualité, tout n'est qu'une mise en scène de la domination. Derrida a enseigné que les textes n'ont pas de sens stable, que tout signifiant glisse, que toute lecture est une trahison, que l'auteur est mort et que le lecteur règne. Deleuze a enseigné qu'il fallait préférer le rhizome à l'arbre, le nomade au sédentaire, le désir à la loi, le devenir à l'être, la différence à l'identité.

Pris isolément, ce sont des thèses discutables. Combinées, exportées, vulgarisées, elles forment un système. Et ce système est un poison.

Car voici ce qui s'est passé. Ces textes, illisibles en France, ont traversé l'Atlantique. Les départements de Yale, de Berkeley, de Columbia les ont absorbés dans les années 80. Ils y ont trouvé un terreau qui n'existait pas chez nous : le puritanisme américain, sa culpabilité raciale, son obsession identitaire. La French Theory s'est mariée à ce substrat, et l'enfant de ce mariage s'appelle le wokisme.

Judith Butler lit Foucault et invente le genre performatif. Edward Said lit Foucault et invente le post-colonialisme académique. Kimberlé Crenshaw hérite du cadre et invente l'intersectionnalité. À chaque étape, la matrice est française : il n'y a pas de vérité, il n'y a que du pouvoir, donc toute hiérarchie est suspecte, toute institution est oppressive, toute norme est violence, toute identité est construite donc négociable, toute majorité est coupable.

Voilà comment trois philosophes parisiens, qui n'ont probablement jamais imaginé leurs conséquences pratiques, ont fourni le logiciel d'exploitation à une génération entière d'activistes, de bureaucrates universitaires, de DRH, de journalistes, de législateurs. Voilà comment on a obtenu une civilisation qui ne sait plus dire si une femme est une femme, si sa propre histoire mérite d'être défendue, si le mérite existe, si la vérité se distingue de l'opinion.

C'est de la merde pour une raison simple, et il faut la dire calmement. Une civilisation se tient debout sur trois piliers : la croyance qu'il existe une vérité accessible à la raison, la croyance qu'il existe un bien distinct du mal, la croyance qu'il existe un héritage à transmettre. La French Theory a entrepris de dynamiter les trois. Pas par méchanceté. Par jeu intellectuel, par fascination du soupçon, par haine de la bourgeoisie qui les avait nourris. Mais le résultat est là. Une génération entière a appris à déconstruire et n'a jamais appris à construire. Une génération entière sait soupçonner et ne sait plus admirer. Une génération entière voit le pouvoir partout et la beauté nulle part.

Je m'excuse parce que nous, Français, avons une responsabilité particulière. C'est notre langue, nos universités, nos éditeurs, notre prestige qui ont donné à ce nihilisme son emballage chic. Sans la légitimité de la Sorbonne et de Vincennes, ces idées n'auraient jamais traversé l'océan. Nous avons exporté le doute comme d'autres exportent des armes.

Ce qui se construit maintenant, en silicon valley, dans les labos d'IA, dans les startups, dans les ateliers, dans tous les lieux où des gens fabriquent encore des choses au lieu de les déconstruire, c'est la réponse. Une civilisation se reconstruit par les bâtisseurs, pas par les commentateurs. Par ceux qui croient que la vérité existe et qu'elle vaut qu'on s'y consacre. Par ceux qui assument une hiérarchie du beau, du vrai, du bon, et qui n'ont pas honte de la transmettre.

Alors pardon. Et au travail.

[Jacopo Coghe @jacopocoghe]

A Torino c'è una stanza che dà fastidio.

Il 16 settembre la Regione Piemonte ha riaperto la Stanza dell'Ascolto all'ospedale Sant'Anna, affidandola in convenzione a un centro di aiuto alla vita. È una stanza dove una donna che sta per abortire può, se vuole, parlare con qualcuno e farsi dire quali aiuti concreti esistono per lei e per suo figlio.

Nessuno la obbliga a entrare e nessuno le impedisce di uscire e di andare avanti.

Il Partito Democratico l'ha chiamata «la stanza della vergogna».

L'articolo 5 della legge 194 dice che lo Stato deve esaminare con la donna le cause che la porterebbero ad abortire e contribuire a rimuoverle. Non è un'opinione mia: è la legge.

Il Partito Democratico difende la legge 194 riga per riga, tranne l'unica riga che impone di aiutare una donna a non abortire. Guarda caso è anche l'unica che può salvare la vita di un bambino.