John Burrows

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

I will never understand how you kick a ball in your possession back to France when you are 1 point ahead with 3 minutes to play - really poor #sixnations

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@hermitflakes @BigBrainPhiloso John 10:34, Psalm 82:6 no?

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@felixprehn Crash

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@thesigmamindset Original post please

[Brett Winton @wintonARK]

What amazing fortune
To be 1 of the 100 billion homo sapiens sapiens that have ever lived
And to be alive at this the moment of the great inflection
Not to be 1 of 50 billion that died of mosquito borne disease
Nor to be 1 of 30 billion that died before age 5
Nor 1 of 10 billion killed in an act of violence
Instead to witness this ahistorical moment, to contribute in whatever small way in our outward expansion and proliferation,
To stand on the cusp of history:
What amazing great good fortune

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@TheFigen_ 👍

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@samruddhi_mokal SORA

[Samruddhi Mokal @samruddhi_mokal]

SORA 2 + Claude + Perplexity is absolutely WILD

This combo is absolutely insane for generating videos that actually convert.

No agencies. No production crews. No creative directors charging $500/hour.

Just three AI tools working together like a professional video team.

Here's how it works:
→ Perplexity researches your product + competitors + winning ad angles
→ Claude analyzes research and writes 10+ video prompts optimized for conversion
→ Sora 2 generates multiple video variations from Claude's prompts
→ Claude scores each video against psychological triggers and platform requirements
→ Best performers get refined and regenerated automatically

Perfect for brands testing creative at scale without burning budget.

The power is in the combo:
Perplexity = market intelligence most creative teams miss
Claude = prompts that understand psychology and platform algorithms
Sora 2 = production quality that looks like you spent $5K per video

While others are briefing agencies for next month's content, you're testing 50 variations this afternoon.

Compare different angles.
Find what converts.
Scale immediately.

Like, RT + reply with "SORA" and I'll DM the complete 3-tool system
(Must be following so I can DM)

Skip this and keep paying agencies $20K/month for 5 videos.

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@NoahEpstein_ Voice

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

Nice one Jose, the world is changing in ways we can't even begin to grasp. Ps I thought you might enjoy this

That post reads like it was written by a human — and quite likely was. Here’s why:

Clues pointing to human authorship:
•Voice and tone: The writing has a personal, conversational tone — full of quirks, emotions, and self-awareness. Lines like “I chose door number two” and “speak the gospel of Jose” reflect a distinct personality and informal storytelling style that AI doesn’t naturally default to.
•Rhythm and pacing: The intentional use of one-line paragraphs, ellipses, and repetition (“I mean…”, “Like, for real.”) mirrors how someone might speak. It creates a dramatic rhythm that suggests a person wrote it to evoke a very specific vibe.
•Vulnerability: Expressing reluctance about being on camera and referencing personal discomfort (“uncomfortable as hell”) adds emotional depth that feels lived-in and genuine.
•Purposeful imperfection: AI often leans toward polished structure and grammar. This post uses intentional sentence fragments and informal grammar as a stylistic choice, which suggests artistic intent.

Could AI have written it?

Technically yes — a skilled writer using AI as a base could prompt it with a tone like this and then heavily edit. But it doesn’t feel like raw AI output. It’s too personality-driven, self-referential, and humanly messy.

Verdict: Almost certainly written by a human. Possibly lightly AI-assisted, but heavily human-guided.

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@BrightInsight6 @RemindMe_OfThis in one week

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@pr0ud_americans @grok can you list all these songs for a Spotify playlist

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@Sbusiso_Rza @twit_graeme @MagnusHeystek Sebusiso, appreciate your work. It is well laid out and comprehensive. I would be really curious if you could straw man a future where South Africa does really well.

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@FlySafair #CustomerExperience #FlyWithFlySafair #FlySafairCares

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@Mofoman360 @KTHopkins Brilliant !!

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@SterlingCooley @joshuahendu Me again back with more questions- can you use the us-2000 or must it be the us-1000 model?

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@SterlingCooley Do you have a referral code - would be great if you got something back?

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

I asked Grok to figure out your recommended devise - I don’t want to wait for zoom call ;-)

Sterling Cooley recommends the US-1000 device for use in his protocol for stimulating microtubules, particularly for Alzheimer's treatment as mentioned in his post from Thread 1 (Post: 1878174724238594405). He specifies it as a device that can be ordered online and is simple to use, suggesting it for 5 minutes on the right temple. Regarding the US Pro 2000 2nd Edition Portable Ultrasound Therapy Device, Sterling does mention it in response to a query about stimulating the Vagus nerve for Alzheimer's and dementia treatment, saying "Yes that device is great 👍" (Post: 1877859695962263986), indicating that he views it positively for use in this context. However, for his specific protocol related to microtubule stimulation, he explicitly recommends the US-1000.

Citations:
-
-

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@SterlingCooley Again thank you- will join your zoom call - really looking forward to learning more

[John Burrows @jfburrows]

@thedarshakrana Interesting how grok responds to this post (nothing to see here!)