@tiniscule That's good to hear. I think what you've pulled together so far is great. If you could find some time to comment on the existing PRs, and/or help them get it merged, I think that would give the current adopters a bit of confidence to pitch in also. Cheers
@DynamicWebPaige Turns out you can just ask Gemini to generate the selenium code to achieve that without a video.
It seems it must be trained on existing repo's that have automated Zillow already.
@alexeyraga If you are sincerely interesting, and would like to challenge your existing bias... refer to my earlier tweet https://t.co/KcKh5DEP50. The testing community have been thinking through this deeply and have developed a rich vocabulary to discuss it. Enter the rabbit hole.
Reading conversations in a forum about “test automation”. These seem to me to be conversations about getting machines to press their own buttons to demonstrate that programs *can* work. This is *not* testing, folks. To *test* is to challenge the product; to discover how it fails.
@alexeyraga Who said anything about websites? You seem to have a very narrow perception of testing. Im sure within that narrow view you may be able yo automate everything. Good for you.
@alexeyraga You seem to be missing the point. Manually running the same test over and over is not testing either. It's checking. Checks can be automated. Testing cannot.