JHB

Researching/ investing in frontier tech across healthcare, consciousness, new physics and anomalous phenomena. M31, The Mycelorium, Fibonacci Research Institute

[Nathaniel Hanks @Na_thanks]

Questions and Answers plus Breaking the News to @haroldputhoff - Paul Werbos is on record that Ed Teller suppressed 'the Cold Fusion success with Pons and Fleischmann in '89'.

@marcf999 @quantumheat
@StuartHameroff @Jason_Jorjani
Substack, for Free.
https://t.co/m0YWPsAE7U

[Jason Reza Jorjani @Jason_Jorjani]

Thanks again to @NathanMontone (M31 Capital) and @Andercot for the invitation to an awesome PHYSICS OF CONSCIOUSNESS event at DEEP TECH WEEK in Austin, TX. Looking forward to the release of the presentation and panel videos in the next few weeks.

[JHB @JHBresearch]

@Jason_Jorjani @NathanMontone @Andercot Thank you again for coming and it was so amazing to meet you!

[JHB @JHBresearch]

One distinction: in my model, microtubules don't create consciousness. The microtubule-generates-consciousness idea you've heard of is Orch OR, from Stuart Hameroff and Roger Penrose, which is quantum.

My framework takes a different route. The brain generates function and structure, and transduces conscious content. Microtubules are a candidate bridge: their periodic lattice plus built-in structural mismatch (the seam) is the kind of geometry that can couple to a hidden degree of freedom in the substrate, classically and at body temperature. They would be part of the receiver, not the source.

On hermeticism, you're not wrong. The substrate is self-similar at every scale, so "as above, so below" has a precise geometric cousin here. The difference is that this version makes predictions that can fail.

[JHB @JHBresearch]

Latest consciousness paper. Let me know what you think https://t.co/wA4eup6J7q

[JHB @JHBresearch]

@0x11_1f @bankr_ssh Not so much create consciousness though…

[JHB @JHBresearch]

@MagentaUFOUAP @ProofofMaro @deeptechweek Assembly hall yesterday.

[JHB @JHBresearch]

@ProofofMaro @deeptechweek So glad you could come!

[JHB @JHBresearch]

@Na_thanks @jamestagg @StuartHameroff @Jason_Jorjani @Andercot @AaloAtomics So glad you liked it! Thanks for joining!

[Andrew Côté @Andercot]

What a bunch of OGs

[JHB @JHBresearch]

@Jason_Jorjani Thank you so much for coming and presenting! I so appreciated it and can’t wait to chat about you coming to nyc!

[JHB @JHBresearch]

@bankr_ssh Yep we talked a bit about that too this week. And the concept of time crystals, very cool

[JHB @JHBresearch]

Yes so reflective information geometry postulates that matter is self referential information (vs light which is information traveling through the substrate) on a quasicrystalline substrate etc which could then mean being self referential is a fundamental characteristic of matter and something that is supported and perpetuated by the substrate. Which then when we got to the math under mode 4 and a coupling mode popped out, it seems like that could be the actual mechanism through which the microtubules could interact with a broader “source” type of thing. even in the infographic you made you have a crystalline structure based on phi. So yeah I think we are saying similar things.

[JHB @JHBresearch]

The word? I mean yes I spend the last few days with Stuart Hameroff and others who are some of the worlds experts in how microtubules are connected to consciousness and my paper and framework is consistent with his work and microtubules. And Fibonacci structures are seen in the functioning of these microtubules . Are you saying something else?

[JHB @JHBresearch]

@bankr_ssh Thank you! This is great! Lots to work through, I’m excited to review

[JHB @JHBresearch]

One more thing on this though, what makes them caught in closure? My view is that the geometry comes from the substrate vs emergent structure . But I think you are saying there is structure. So why would photons find structure through history vs something else? Are there any experimental or other predictions you can point to? Because I think we end up in similar places but I haven’t fully understood how yours starts and why

[JHB @JHBresearch]

Thanks for sending! I'm working on a similar information first framework (Reflexive Information Geometry, Fibonacci Research Institute), which also uses SPARC as one of its main empirical tests. Our starting points differ (seems like u build from Compton-clock particles and boundary writes; RIG from a 2D quasicrystalline substrate), but the overlap is interesting. Two quick questions , your a₀ = cH₀/2π implies a₀ tracks H(z), so do you have a prediction for high redshift rotation curves that separates SFT from standard MOND? Might be interesting to run both against the same subset with a shared holdout. That way we could see where predictions diverge. Anyway, thanks for sharing!

[JHB @JHBresearch]

@kanwaldeep_k @Shaun_Fosmark He pioneered work on dissipative structures. So yes that is a part of it.

[JHB @JHBresearch]

@jamiesfocus @M31Capital @StuartHameroff @Jason_Jorjani @MaxDerakhshani So glad you liked it! More to come like this!