Feeling nostalgic about building startups again.
A few moments from AI, robotics, autonomy, and early experiments — plus meeting people who helped shape today’s AI and tech landscape:
https://t.co/6L2ZxpgO6S
So true, that is the struggle, in many places you can get away with abstract understanding when the underlying components are robust, like you can build websites without understanding OS, or CPU. But with AI generated code that you must understand to stand by it, trust it.
Have been doing these organically for many months, including Marp for presentation, as I value content more than fancy images. See https://t.co/WlMGdhBI1U MD file https://t.co/ixP4JXHpW4
LLM Knowledge Bases
Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So:
Data ingest:
I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them.
IDE:
I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides).
Q&A:
Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale.
Output:
Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base.
Linting:
I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into.
Extra tools:
I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries.
Further explorations:
As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows.
TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.
Grok 4.20 Non-Hallucination rate improved to even higher than previous highest
Just days ago, it hit a record-breaking 78% Non-Hallucination Rate - already #1 in the world, smoking Claude Opus 4.6 (max), Gemini 3.1, GPT-5.4 (xhigh), and every other major model
Now, it just pushed that number even higher to 83%
While every other AI confidently makes up stuff and fabricate answers it doesn't know - Grok simply says "I don't know"
Introducing GEN-1.
Our latest milestone in scaling robot learning.
We believe it to be the first general-purpose AI model to master simple physical tasks.
99% success rates, 3x faster speeds, adapts in real time to unexpected scenarios, w/ only 1 hour of robot data.
More🧵👇
GTC 2026 = Year of the Agent
Open models winning
OpenClaw broke enterprise security
RL replaced fine-tuning
Inference > Training
Background agents running for days
Sovereign AI accelerating in Europe
Model race flattening. Systems engineering race just started
🧵
Built an AI email assistant that can't go rogue and delete all your emails
Gmail tells you you're out of space.
But won't tell you WHY.
MailSweep is an open-source IMAP mailbox analyzer. Think WinDirStat, but for your email.
https://t.co/Kl5ddcUugH
@TechCrunch I am made a tool to cleanup inbox, with human in the loop https://t.co/Fo4AWcuHM1
MailSweep is an open-source IMAP mailbox analyzer. Think WinDirStat, but for your email.
No autonomous agents. No "oops it deleted everything." Just tools that respect your data.