OpenAI and Anthropic need to post actual numbers re what your $$ equates to in terms of token usage. The burn rate changes too much week to week. Time to buck up and stand behind some figures @sama@DarioAmodei
Check this out! We’ve just released full prototype mounting and editing in Enhance: https://t.co/2atoZrUNss
Take your prototype, wherever you’ve built it, and just ask Claude/Codex/your fav agent to mount it into an Enhance canvas. Then tweak it, re-design it, and fold your changes back in. It’s incredibly powerful.
We have a heap more in the works (feature-wise, and on the core experience) which we’ll be showcasing over the next few weeks, but I’m super keen for you all to give this a try.
In a randomised trial, software developers using AI took 19% longer to complete tasks. Yet they believed AI had made them 20% faster.
At the ‘Evidence in Action’ event, I argued for a government that tests what works, and saves money by learning from the results. https://t.co/mgL3dIXaY8 #randomistas
There’s obviously been some internal guidance at OpenAI encouraging its employees to post and engage on here more. I’m seeing heaps of OAI employees come out of the woodwork and posting over the last 24 hours.
I’m mainly just curious about the inside baseball around this… what was the external comms guidance, yadda yadda. It’s all clearly very intentional
Dear Young Designer
This essay was written before AI changed everything. But once you read it, you'll notice that it all still applies. Because in the end, nothing really changed at the core.
Keep designing!
https://t.co/fIMrzVdhkX
@gwuyang@OpenAI Feel like there’s obviously been some internal comms encouraging you guys to get on Twitter. Seeing heaps of OAI employees posting here the last day or so. Curious about the inside baseball around this if you can share