@saptasindhu007@paxxkhalsa does this even make any sense? sikhs came 400 years ago . Given that in that timeline they had best history throughout india. its like saying who would win in a race btw ferrari and horse in 700 bce when ferrari didnt even exist.😂😅😅😅
@RANA_VS_ALL@BharadiaSamarth bhai ye mostly overall social caste status ke basis pe hota hai . Tarkhans ka even aaj b jatts and rajput se jyada hoga . Par traditional social hirerachy mai jatts/rajputs ka upper status tha so they are general.
@MislJatt@JTsarwanath@casteobession ya mostly tarkhans lie in between 25-30 range but low on aasi which kind of is much better than noth broms . cause north broms are 30+ aasi. but tarkhans cluster 1:1 with Kashmiri Pandits
@NomadicBrahmin tarkhans / bhumihars were brahmins which were outcasted for so and so reason . that is why they also claimed this status back in 19 hundreds , but now genes test back that they cluster with thier indegenous brahmin group. moreover tarkhans literacy is higher than Jats and rajputs
@simdim90@bahlawat10@singhgurinder85 tarkhans literacy rate was higher than jats and rajputs that too in 1931. have a nice day talking shit about sikhi. lol
@bahlawat10@simdim90@singhgurinder85 tarkhans literacy rate was higher than jats and rajputs that too in 1931. have a nice day talking shit about sikhi. lol
@Antidote1x@BharadiaSamarth This Gc Bc is all cap tho . tarkhans were considered in general caste before 2008, 2001 . does it mean they were hindu uppercaste before 2008,2001 . i dont think soo
@Antidote1x@BharadiaSamarth yes i know what u mean but i think he is only considering uppercaste under hindu structure. jatts were always out of hindu caste structure cause farming was considered a lowly job acc to hindu shastras