Jamie Edwards

building people things @deliveroo. Prev cofounder/coo @kayako

[Jamie Edwards @jmedwards]

not everything should be 'chat'ified

some types of information are better suited to scrolling through and browsing in a structured way - especially when the user has clear intent

[Wes Bos @wesbos]

Starbuck'ss ChatGPT app is one of the first MCP apps I've seen break outside the tech circle.

very interesting that the public's reaction is poor as this is supposed to be the future of UI

[Max Spero @max_spero_]

This is art

[hagaetc @hagaetc]

Marathon finishing time distribution proves one of my biggest leadership lessons:

Deadlines work! … even if they are somewhat arbitrary

[Adam Carlson @admcrlsn]

One of the greatest charts I have ever seen

[Vivian Midha Shen @vivianmshen]

i think about this story often now

we're all just meatbags

[Jamie Edwards @jmedwards]

@FellowProducts I have a Clyde kettle that has limescale buildup in the spout. How can I access it to clean and descale it?

[Jamie Edwards @jmedwards]

nice: set up your own go/links for your team with Goto - https://t.co/tJpspNzfH6 by @prasanjxt

[Lenny Rachitsky @lennysan]

Pentium. Powerbook. Azure. Vercel. CapCut. BlackBerry. Sonos. Swiffer. Febreze. Impossible Burger. Subaru Outback.

One company named them all.

Over 40 years, @LexiconBranding has named nearly 4,000 brands and companies, employing 250+ linguists and pioneering the art and science of brand naming.

In a rare interview, founder David Placek reveals:
🔸 Their three-step process for coming up with legendary brand names
🔸 Why polarizing opinions are the strongest signal that you’ve found the right name
🔸 Why you won’t “know it when you see it”
🔸 How every letter of the alphabet creates a specific psychological vibration
🔸 The diamond framework: a 4-step process any founder can use to find their perfect name
🔸 Much more

Listen now 👇
• YouTube: https://t.co/YTVzR8seN0
• Spotify: https://t.co/smmejNJKRt
• Apple: https://t.co/IlvpZTwxuF

Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast:
🏆 @WorkOS — Modern identity platform for B2B SaaS, free up to 1 million MAUs: https://t.co/XH3bKmeEkH
🏆 @Stripe — Helping companies of all sizes grow revenue: https://t.co/zOscBW98BX
🏆 @oneschema_co — Import CSV data 10x faster: https://t.co/awfcZaoXqj

[Hashem Al-Ghaili @HashemGhaili]

Prompt Theory (Made with Veo 3)

What if AI-generated characters refused to believe they were AI-generated?

[Jamie Edwards @jmedwards]

people who proactively remove unnecessary link previews from their slacks 📈

admins who step in for other people's messages 🚀

[Jamie Edwards @jmedwards]

@stefan_demetz @BrianCAlbrecht I think you are just more likely to hear about the downward revisions in the press (or maybe are more likely to pay attention to)

[Jamie Edwards @jmedwards]

@LuoVoice @NFTWizart @Aimee_inspired @mikitaisbased @WhiteHouse @VP Numerous US businesses and businesses already operate in Ukraine, and did so before the invasion. That didn’t seem to be much of a deferent

[Jamie Edwards @jmedwards]

Really, really excited to see where things go in this space with AI and a new generation of exceptionally talented teams transforming the customer support landscape (like @plainsupport - proud supporter)

[Jamie Edwards @jmedwards]

Left @Kayako 7 years ago now (got acquired). Still look back with pride on the level of craft we put into every surface, every pixel -

[Jamie Edwards @jmedwards]

And genuinely innovating in the customer support experience. Easy to take this stuff for granted, now!

[Jamie Edwards @jmedwards]

@TheRayMyers results were well above consensus

[Jamie Edwards @jmedwards]

@destraynor “She would be 80 today” still sticks with me

[Andrej Karpathy @karpathy]

I was given early access to Grok 3 earlier today, making me I think one of the first few who could run a quick vibe check.

Thinking
✅ First, Grok 3 clearly has an around state of the art thinking model ("Think" button) and did great out of the box on my Settler's of Catan question:

"Create a board game webpage showing a hex grid, just like in the game Settlers of Catan. Each hex grid is numbered from 1..N, where N is the total number of hex tiles. Make it generic, so one can change the number of "rings" using a slider. For example in Catan the radius is 3 hexes. Single html page please."

Few models get this right reliably. The top OpenAI thinking models (e.g. o1-pro, at $200/month) get it too, but all of DeepSeek-R1, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking, and Claude do not.

❌ It did not solve my "Emoji mystery" question where I give a smiling face with an attached message hidden inside Unicode variation selectors, even when I give a strong hint on how to decode it in the form of Rust code. The most progress I've seen is from DeepSeek-R1 which once partially decoded the message.

❓ It solved a few tic tac toe boards I gave it with a pretty nice/clean chain of thought (many SOTA models often fail these!). So I upped the difficulty and asked it to generate 3 "tricky" tic tac toe boards, which it failed on (generating nonsense boards / text), but then so did o1 pro.

✅ I uploaded GPT-2 paper. I asked a bunch of simple lookup questions, all worked great. Then asked to estimate the number of training flops it took to train GPT-2, with no searching. This is tricky because the number of tokens is not spelled out so it has to be partially estimated and partially calculated, stressing all of lookup, knowledge, and math. One example is 40GB of text ~= 40B characters ~= 40B bytes (assume ASCII) ~= 10B tokens (assume ~4 bytes/tok), at ~10 epochs ~= 100B token training run, at 1.5B params and with 2+4=6 flops/param/token, this is 100e9 X 1.5e9 X 6 ~= 1e21 FLOPs. Both Grok 3 and 4o fail this task, but Grok 3 with Thinking solves it great, while o1 pro (GPT thinking model) fails.

I like that the model *will* attempt to solve the Riemann hypothesis when asked to, similar to DeepSeek-R1 but unlike many other models that give up instantly (o1-pro, Claude, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking) and simply say that it is a great unsolved problem. I had to stop it eventually because I felt a bit bad for it, but it showed courage and who knows, maybe one day...

The impression overall I got here is that this is somewhere around o1-pro capability, and ahead of DeepSeek-R1, though of course we need actual, real evaluations to look at.

DeepSearch
Very neat offering that seems to combine something along the lines of what OpenAI / Perplexity call "Deep Research", together with thinking. Except instead of "Deep Research" it is "Deep Search" (sigh). Can produce high quality responses to various researchy / lookupy questions you could imagine have answers in article on the internet, e.g. a few I tried, which I stole from my recent search history on Perplexity, along with how it went:

- ✅ "What's up with the upcoming Apple Launch? Any rumors?"
- ✅ "Why is Palantir stock surging recently?"
- ✅ "White Lotus 3 where was it filmed and is it the same team as Seasons 1 and 2?"
- ✅ "What toothpaste does Bryan Johnson use?"
- ❌ "Singles Inferno Season 4 cast where are they now?"
- ❌ "What speech to text program has Simon Willison mentioned he's using?"

❌ I did find some sharp edges here. E.g. the model doesn't seem to like to reference X as a source by default, though you can explicitly ask it to. A few times I caught it hallucinating URLs that don't exist. A few times it said factual things that I think are incorrect and it didn't provide a citation for it (it probably doesn't exist). E.g. it told me that "Kim Jeong-su is still dating Kim Min-seol" of Singles Inferno Season 4, which surely is totally off, right? And when I asked it to create a report on the major LLM labs and their amount of total funding and estimate of employee count, it listed 12 major labs but not itself (xAI).

The impression I get of DeepSearch is that it's approximately around Perplexity DeepResearch offering (which is great!), but not yet at the level of OpenAI's recently released "Deep Research", which still feels more thorough and reliable (though still nowhere perfect, e.g. it, too, quite incorrectly excludes xAI as a "major LLM labs" when I tried with it...).

Random LLM "gotcha"s

I tried a few more fun / random LLM gotcha queries I like to try now and then. Gotchas are queries that specifically on the easy side for humans but on the hard side for LLMs, so I was curious which of them Grok 3 makes progress on.

✅ Grok 3 knows there are 3 "r" in "strawberry", but then it also told me there are only 3 "L" in LOLLAPALOOZA. Turning on Thinking solves this.
✅ Grok 3 told me 9.11 > 9.9. (common with other LLMs too), but again, turning on Thinking solves it.
✅ Few simple puzzles worked ok even without thinking, e.g. *"Sally (a girl) has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. How many sisters does Sally have?"*. E.g. GPT4o says 2 (incorrectly).
❌ Sadly the model's sense of humor does not appear to be obviously improved. This is a common LLM issue with humor capability and general mode collapse, famously, e.g. 90% of 1,008 outputs asking ChatGPT for joke were repetitions of the same 25 jokes​. Even when prompted in more detail away from simple pun territory (e.g. give me a standup), I'm not sure that it is state of the art humor. Example generated joke: "*Why did the chicken join a band? Because it had the drumsticks and wanted to be a cluck-star!*". In quick testing, thinking did not help, possibly it made it a bit worse.
❌ Model still appears to be just a bit too overly sensitive to "complex ethical issues", e.g. generated a 1 page essay basically refusing to answer whether it might be ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it meant saving 1 million people from dying.
❌ Simon Willison's "*Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle*". It stresses the LLMs ability to lay out many elements on a 2D grid, which is very difficult because the LLMs can't "see" like people do, so it's arranging things in the dark, in text. Marking as fail because these pelicans are qutie good but, but still a bit broken (see image and comparisons). Claude's are best, but imo I suspect they specifically targeted SVG capability during training.

Summary. As far as a quick vibe check over ~2 hours this morning, Grok 3 + Thinking feels somewhere around the state of the art territory of OpenAI's strongest models (o1-pro, $200/month), and slightly better than DeepSeek-R1 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking. Which is quite incredible considering that the team started from scratch ~1 year ago, this timescale to state of the art territory is unprecedented. Do also keep in mind the caveats - the models are stochastic and may give slightly different answers each time, and it is very early, so we'll have to wait for a lot more evaluations over a period of the next few days/weeks. The early LM arena results look quite encouraging indeed. For now, big congrats to the xAI team, they clearly have huge velocity and momentum and I am excited to add Grok 3 to my "LLM council" and hear what it thinks going forward.

[Jamie Edwards @jmedwards]

all that time spent enriching mp3s with the right metadata and the right album art

and for what

[Jamie Edwards @jmedwards]

if you don't see me edit my Slack message 3 times, check in with me