Josh Pasek (Frozen Account)

Assoc. Prof. in Comm & Media, Political Science, and Data Science at the University of Michigan - No longer using Twitter - find me elsewhere

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

What is amazing about this poll result is that 1) these are not "values" and 2) all of the "values" they ask about have a completely different context than in the prior surveys - Interpreting them is a BIG challenge and everyone in the polling world knows it

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

@JohnKasich I suggest @AdamKinzinger

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

@kevin_dorst @RaBhui @DG_Rand @DmitriGallow @KieranSetiya @hakeemjefferson @FabianNeuner and I found strong evidence that this happens with racial attitudes and police shootings https://t.co/FgmroWglFv

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

@BillyJoyner More likely to be purchased by some foreign government though after we have all abandoned the place.

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

The vibes… https://t.co/Ge57JPdyMv

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

also proud to have published a scientific study based in part on street interviews from a @JimmyKimmelLive clip

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

Is the influence of question wording about framing or comprehension? We find it is often both.

[International Journal of Public Opinion Research @IJPOR_Journal]

👏👏New paper "Do you prefer #Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act? Simulating an informed public to improve survey measurement" by @gabrielmiaoli and @jmping

https://t.co/z0dIOh5Ssk

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

@apearlma @gelliottmorris That was the source of my best-ever NYT Quote: “If somebody’s not transparent you can generally assume they’re crap.”

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

@zeynep We have a repository of data here at Michigan, but may only be internally usable; happy to try to find a local collaborator if you want - can you share a little more info/send an email?

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

@NathanKalmoe @ntdPhD The marginal question is whether things change the probability of chaos if we had a perfect replication of the 2020 election scenario. To that Q, it seems the answer is the likelihood went down rather than up. Reps would need to win in 2024 rather than just pretend they did.

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

@NathanKalmoe @ntdPhD Yes, but the chance that we can avoid that madness is considerably higher today than we thought it would be yesterday. For madness to occur, Reps need to take the house more decisively than they are going to this cycle.

[Anne Applebaum @anneapplebaum]

chilling

[Brendan Nyhan (@BrendanNyhan on 🟦☁️) @BrendanNyhan]

22 months ago a violent insurrection inspired by the President sought to overturn a democratic election and prevent the peaceful transfer of power. The threat is now, if anything, worse. 2020 denialism is now pervasive & the legitimacy of the 2022 election is already under attack

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

@josh_braun I’m @[email protected]

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

@nataliemj10 Ouch, that one stung.

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

Do all the laid off Twitter employees have a valid noncompete clause or are they instead perfectly poised to create a rival social network?

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

@davekarpf @cmMcConnaughy I wasn’t implying that you *would* do it, just that you are one of the few who could

[Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) @jmping]

@dfreelon I’d be in - I could also host it here through the Michigan Institute for Data Science if desired