Jim 🇮🇱

Male sex offenders are using a loophole to get into women's prisons. If you close this loophole, fuckwits will call you a Nazi. What do you do?

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

Of course capitalism isn't natural, you incomplete set of plastic picnic utensils.

What's natural is theft, robbery, and murder.

What's natural is anarchy, chaos, the rape of the weak by the strong, and nature red in tooth and claw.

The free market, which you call "capitalism", is not called "free" because everyone is free to do whatever they want. Because what a lot of people want to do is steal. You'll know which ones by the hammer and sickle logo they draw on things.

No, the free market is called free because it is freed from coercion and violence.

And of course it was spread by violence, you factory-defective lawn flamingo. Because it was spread by hanging all the bandits and robbers, and if hangings aren't violence I don't know what is.

And of course it's maintained by coercion, you British pub food connoisseur. If you don't coerce thieves not to steal, then they will steal everything you build faster than than you can build it.

You have to use violence to stop the violent, and coerce the coercers not to coerce.

And of course it's maintained by the superficial facade of liberal democracy, you Vogon poetry appreciator. The global average citizen is a mentally retarded third-world savage with less emotional self-control than my cat. If we let them have candidates that truly represented their agenda, then every useful thing humanity has built for the last twelve thousand years would be torn down in a week to buy them more party drugs. Followed by every woman being raped to death, and then uncomprehending starvation as they slowly and painfully learned that grocery stores don't spontaneously spawn food pickups, like in video games.

Jesus Christ, woman, you're talking about a species that evolved to live in hominid tribes of 100 apes, and throw rocks at zebras. In modern civilization, the so-called "average" person is so far out of his depth that the fish have lights on their noses.

And the more complex and sophisticated civilization gets, the more investments in the future that we need to protect, so that the retarded monkeys don't steal them all to buy more vodka and cigarettes.

Yeah, sure, sometimes capitalist systems end up defending property that someone's great-grandfather stole. But so fucking what? You think communism is gonna fix that? You think communism is gonna bring justice?

Communist nations can't afford justice. They can't even manage to feed themselves half the time. Get back to us when you've mastered the agricultural revolution, we've only been waiting since the beginning of recorded time.

The trick is to put the seeds in the dirt, guys.

[Liz Kershaw @LizKershawDJ]

Seems that you, #KeirStarmer, a lawyer, have apparently already convicted this guy. You've published his photo and already claim to know his MOTIVE ! After the Southport savagery you told us no info could be released about the suspect as it could cause his trial to collapse. And here you are confirming that you dictate to the judiciary promising " the full force of the law"
Please just GO NOW #TwoYearKeir

[Nym @nym]

June so far:
🇬🇧 UK announced ID checks at device level.
🇨🇦 Canada announced it's joining the social media ban.
🇮🇳 India banned Telegram.
🇪🇺 EU claimed its age verification cannot be bypassed by VPN.
🏛️ Council of Europe breached. 297 GB gone.

Italy said none of this will work.

So far Italy is the only one that's right.

[Secure Privacy @SecurePrivacyAI]

"Privacy is only for people hiding something."

So is a locked door.
So is a curtain.
So is an unlisted number.

Protection is being re-framed as "hiding".

Locks were never about guilt.
They were always about who gets to decide who enters.

[S A M M Y Woodhouse @officialsammyuk]

Due to the Sentencing Act 2026, Arshid Hussain – the man who abducted and raped me as a child, and who did the same to dozens of other children – is being considered for early release. He was sentenced to 35 years in prison in early 2017 and was described as one of the most dangerous men in the UK. He was later convicted of further offences.

His brother, Basharat Hussain, is also being considered for release.

I honestly can’t put into words how disgusted I am with the British government.

[Benonwine @benonwine]

Labour says a further statement on VPN’s will be made in July, with restrictions now being discussed following the social media ban.

This should concern everyone, not just parents or teenagers.

Millions of ordinary people use VPNs to protect their privacy, secure their personal data, and browse the internet without being tracked. The idea that the government is now looking at restricting access to them is a step in the wrong direction.

History teaches us that free societies encourage people to think, question, and challenge those in power. Governments should never be afraid of an informed public.

As the saying goes: “When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”

Privacy is not a crime. Questioning those in power is not extremism. Freedom, once surrendered, is rarely won back without a fight. 🇬🇧

[mert @mert]

imagine a place that mandates:

- device surveillance or jail
- app level surveillance and backdoors
- banning VPNs altogether (hint: you cant)
- you can get "allowance" via doing KYC

no, the place is not NK, but the UK!

this is the most insane surveillance push in all history

[WasAcop @WasAcop]

🚨Labour confirms ID requirement at device level - VPNs useless.🚨

By forcing Apple and Google to verify age at the device level during phone setup…

Keir Starmer’s government isn’t protecting kids — it’s building a surveillance infrastructure.

The OS itself will restrict platforms like TikTok, Instagram and X, making VPNs largely useless because the block happens before any traffic leaves your phone.

🚨Once every device carries a verified age profile, authorities gain an easy route to identify users through legal requests to tech firms.

This is digital ID by the back door, sold as child safety.

Classic Labour: expand state control first, ask questions later.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

https://t.co/Ca4aMkAZqw

[Possum Reviews @ReviewsPossum]

I wonder why.

[Chay Bowes @BowesChay]

Starmer's most senior advisor-

"Kill musks Twitter"

A letter from Morgan McSweeney, head of British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s office (until his resignation earlier in 2026), outlined strategic tasks and priorities. Among them, the first goal was to “destroy Elon Musk’s Twitter” (now X).

Two years ago, an internal document from the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) listed “Kill Musk’s Twitter” as one of its annual priorities. The document also highlighted plans to pressure advertisers, trigger regulatory action in the EU and UK, and push for policy changes in the United States.

CCDH was co-founded by Morgan McSweeney, who later became Keir Starmer’s chief of staff. This week, Prime Minister Starmer announced plans that could strip X of certain self-regulation rights.

Simultaneously, the UK regulator Ofcom has launched an official investigation into X regarding the activities of Grok, xAI’s AI chatbot. Ofcom has the power to impose fines of up to 10% of a company’s global annual turnover or, in extreme cases, seek to restrict access to the platform in the UK.

Additionally, this week Starmer announced the government’s intention to introduce a full ban on social media use, including X, for all children under 16, with the measure set to take effect by spring
The British government is also advancing plans that could require operating system developers (such as Apple and Google) to implement scanning tools on mobile devices to detect and prevent the sharing of certain content, particularly targeting child protection concerns.

George Orwell would be shocked.

[Taylor Lorenz @TaylorLorenz]

When ID verification inevitably “fails” the government will seek to ban VPNs. This is why we need to reject these authoritarian censorship and mass surveillance policies and the false moral panic they’re predicated on

[Just.A.Thought 💭 @e_galv]

I'm sorry but if you believe governments around the world that are ignoring and/or involved in a global pedophilia ring are forcing digital ID for internet access to "protect the children", you are really fucking stupid.

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

Oh my God. They knew what they were doing to their Citizens.

Inquiry on Mayor Sadiq Khan: “He described evidence as politically motivated”

Inquiry on Keir Starmer: ‘He knew it was happening…but let them off with warning letters”

[Benonwine @benonwine]

Absolutely no one voted for Digital I.D.

If it’s such a great idea, put it to a referendum and let the public decide.

That’s how democracy is supposed to work.

[Taylor Lorenz @TaylorLorenz]

“What’s really being done here is trying to eliminate online anonymity. If you cannot criticize the govt anonymously and if wrong speech is a crime then it becomes easy to identify all the detractors of the govt in power, and ban, fine or jail them for speech crimes.”

[Mike Solana @micsolana]

the purpose is not to remove young people from the internet. the purpose is to remove anonymity from the internet in a country where the government routinely punishes dissent with jail. the british caliphate is no longer free.

[Silkie Carlo @silkiecarlo]

Don’t take it from me.

Take it from one of the internet’s greatest pioneers @jimmy_wales

[Ivana Girard Lefebvre @ivanalefebvreh]

Banning social media for kids under sixteen sounds like such a good policy idea until you realize that the United Kingdom is now going to take everyone’s government ID and tie it to their words online.

That doesn’t sound so bad either, until you remember that the UK arrests about 12,000 people a year for social media posts.

Add in the fact that they’re not requiring Bluesky to be a part of this scheme and you realize this is just another way to arrest people on the right for having thoughts.

[The Undercurrent @NotTheirScript]

If you don’t think radical ideology can threaten this country, you weren’t watching the transgender movement.

In barely a decade we went from biology being a settled fact to being told gender identity overrides it, that kids can decide their own sex, and that anyone who hesitated was a bigot. It started as a fringe academic idea. Then it was in the schools, the hospitals, the boardrooms, and the government.

It didn’t take a majority. It took a small, disciplined movement that knew which buttons to push, compassion, victimhood, the fear of being called cruel. And it worked.

That’s the part to sit with. It was never about one issue. It’s proof that a determined movement can rewrite an entire society faster than anyone thinks possible. If it happened once, it can happen again.

Pay attention….

[mert @mert]

this is absolutely insane

- the UK now proposes scanning of all PRIVATE content on user devices or *jail* (for the execs) of device companies

^ recall how the french already arrested pavel earlier this year

- this is on a *device level* -- meaning you can not even use the phone freely *unless you literally KYC* -- does not matter which apps you use

- on top of this, they will require *another* KYC submission on the app-level to access certain apps

so this would mandate both device-level and app-level surveillance

this is the most draconian shit I have seen in tech yet