jmtrs

Senior Software Engineer · Full-Stack & AppSec · Node.js · Python · Java · AI Enablement

[jmtrs @jmtrs]

@midudev Pobre Mistral :(

[Lucho @luchoitm]

"Voy a llamar a pequeñas empresas, venderles desarrollos con IA y ganar dinero desde Bali"

[Uday @CoderUday]

Today, in office, I stole the credit of other's work

Even though I received most of the help, I removed their name

I am feeling sorry for what I did

I removed the line 'Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor/.com>' from the commit😭

[jmtrs @jmtrs]

@CoderUday that removes AI-generated Co-Authored-By trailers while preserving human co-authors, in case it’s useful to you or your team

https://t.co/KjzPQLf0JV

[Klaas @forgebitz]

grok is stealing your code

gpt is deleting your code

claude is taking your money

[Arena.ai @arena]

Grok-4.5 from @SpaceXAI debuts at #13 on the new Agent Arena leaderboard, based on 9.8K live agentic sessions.

Compared to Grok 4.3, this release is a significant step forward in agentic performance (#29->#13). It makes major gains on Bash Recovery, catching up to Anthropic and OpenAI models, and shows a substantial increase in confirmed task success, making it far more effective in real-world use. Check out rankings by signal below.

Congrats to the SpaceXAI team on the strong Grok-4.5 release!

[Vlad Khononov @vladikk]

When Claude writes code, it signs the commit: Co-Authored-By: Claude. I'm paying for the model, and it still takes a credit line. Okay, fine.

But co-authorship is a claim about contribution. And that logic should work both ways.

So what about all those people who involuntarily "contributed" the training data? You know, half the internet. Don't they deserve co-authorship on the models?

[jmtrs @jmtrs]

@vladikk Exactly. The part that bothers me, the attribution is added by default, without explicit consent.

I recently extended a Git hook that removes AI-generated Co-Authored-By trailers while preserving human co-authors, in case it’s useful to you or your team

https://t.co/KjzPQLf0JV

[jmtrs @jmtrs]

AI coding tools increasingly add themselves as co-authors to Git commits by default.

But who gave them permission to claim authorship?

If a developer wants to credit an AI tool, that’s perfectly valid. The problem is making that attribution automatic, as if consent were assumed.

So I extended no-coAuthor, a Git hook that removes AI-generated Co-Authored-By trailers while preserving real human co-authors.

The goal is simple: attribution should be opt-in, not imposed by default.

Built on the original work by @0xdsgnrd:
https://t.co/R9joNJAeW5

[jmtrs @jmtrs]

@generalitat Hoy con suerte he visto un camión de bomberos en Aldaia, los locales cortando calles pero ni se manchan y del Ayto ni hablar. Son los particulares los que están sacando esto adelante, la gente va con sus patrols y 4x4 a ayudar, dejen que se desplacen 🙏

[jmtrs @jmtrs]

@Mariogr9 @GIGANTESbasket Sii pero no encuentro la mallas 😭

[jmtrs @jmtrs]

@arkan565 Se hace un poco pesado sí es un para un proyecto ligero, pero sí quieres la potencia de react tienes que morir en el o en sus versiones lite, como: https://t.co/R8R4GMYZk8

[jmtrs @jmtrs]

@kolinkarel ... Ironman no merece ser metido en el mismo saco que Batman. Un poquito de por favor.

[jmtrs @jmtrs]

@lifeatgoogle But in case you want me to try 49 different options it's a good challenge. 😄😘

[jmtrs @jmtrs]

@HBO_ES ¿Algún capítulo que filtrar? ;)

[jmtrs @jmtrs]

@josejacas ¿El blade o el render con octane? jaja

[jmtrs @jmtrs]

@pccomponentes Okey gracias.

[jmtrs @jmtrs]

@pccomponentes no he visto que hayáis mandado ningún mensaje a los usuarios para que cambien de contraseña. ¿El cloudbleed no os afecta?