@MikeRokap@justnictings Yet impaired enough that they tested him.
I have never been submitted to a "random" drug test.
I'm sorry, but you were not there, and did not see the lab results.
You are just "guestimating"
@9_Moley I really think a lot of commenters on here don't seem to see the difference.
One player tests positive to police test, one (I should say 7 or 8) is photographed with a powder.
2 different scenarios. 2 different reactions.
Or players test positive to official tests and get 2-4 yrs
@a_eugol Only if the team he is playing for try to pull swifty and try to get him to serve it when he was never going to play anyway.
Souths had no intention playing Latrell so thought they would try and make it count as his suspension.
@scotts1961@PhilGould15@CameronBell NRL don't give 1 week bans for testing positive to cocaine.
They give bans for the player putting themselves and the league in shit situations and getting photographed doing thinks that don't look good.
can't test positive on a photo. Powder could be anything, no test, no proof