joel c

Law and policy enthusiast. Founder @

[joel c @joelcoh]

Lawyers = Radiologists. John B. Quinn on how AI is making certain experts (like litigators) better at their jobs rather than replacing them... for now.

[John B. Quinn @jbqlaw]

Will AI replace lawyers? No. But it will transform how they work.

Watch me with @ProfJohnMorley and @joelcoh on New Law Order as we discuss the potential of AI in improving efficiency and strategy in the legal industry.

[joel c @joelcoh]

AI isn’t just changing the practice of law. It is stress-test trillions in contracts.

[Talks On Law @TalksOnLaw]

“It’s like code that’s never been debugged.”
––@YaleLawSch prof @ScottJShapiro on AI's impact on the legal space.

New Law Order podcast ep 5: https://t.co/9o9BXOitiB 🎙️: @ProfJohnMorley @joelcoh

[joel c @joelcoh]

Law firms optimize for outcomes.
Public companies optimize for multiples.

Bogart explains why “we’ll win” doesn’t math.

[Talks On Law @TalksOnLaw]

$10M in litigation costs.
$100M claim.

One destroys enterprise value.
The other doesn’t restore it!

Latest New Law Order Podcast is out w/ @BurfordCapital founder, Chris Bogart.

https://t.co/YtUd6CBbiX 🎙️ @joelcoh @ProfJohnMorley #NewLawOrder

[John B. Quinn @jbqlaw]

I joined @joelcoh and @ProfJohnMorley on the @TalksOnLaw podcast 'New Law Order', to discuss the beginnings of @quinnemanuel, what separates firms that adapt from those that do not, and the advantages of staying ahead.

Thank you both for having me.

🎧Listen: https://t.co/arGvi7xoUD

[joel c @joelcoh]

@jbqlaw @ProfJohnMorley @TalksOnLaw @quinnemanuel John Quinn is a 1 of 1.

[joel c @joelcoh]

We started New Law Order with @JeffreyToobin because he’s spent decades watching how legal institutions respond under pressure.

Episode 1 is about what happens when that pressure is applied directly by the president.

[Talks On Law @TalksOnLaw]

Episode 1 of "New Law Order" is out.

A TalksOnLaw podcast hosted by John Morley (@YaleLawSch) and @joelcoh, featuring long-form conversations with people driving change in law world.

Listen here:
https://t.co/ouCTLzTqbi

[joel c @joelcoh]

With AI, privacy rights are evaporating like Wi-Fi at Coachella once the crowd starts livestreaming...

The brilliant @DanielSolove explains why, as a right, privacy is not holding up well. Worth a listen if you are interested AI or #privacylaw. @gwlaw

[Talks On Law @TalksOnLaw]

In the #AI era, "Reasonable Expectation of Privacy" may NO LONGER be reasonable. We talk to top privacy law expert @DanielSolove of @gwlaw about how gov use of commercial data, legacy doctrines, & AI combine in unexpected ways. 🎧 Latest episode in our #AILawyer series: https://t.co/86OquzAd33 #AILaw host @joelcoh

[joel c @joelcoh]

New Out of Office: Sorry, can't do work now. Unable to look away from @elonmusk X feed. 😮

[joel c @joelcoh]

Spoiler... Yes, AI weapons = the future and increasingly the present. @MittRegan explains how the laws of war can use data to evaluate autonomous systems and when "human in the loop" adds value and when it is just window dressing for an AI kill.

[Talks On Law @TalksOnLaw]

Are Fully Autonomous Weapons a Violation of International Law—or the Future of Warcraft? We asked @MittRegan of @GeorgetownLaw to unpack the legal and ethical challenges in the latest #AILawyerPodcast. Don’t miss this critical discussion. https://t.co/cumwI6U0ME (#ailaw @joelcoh #lawofwar)

[joel c @joelcoh]

RT @TalksOnLaw: Legal AI is challenging what it means to be a lawyer and whether the gatekeeping role of bar associations is still justifie…

[joel c @joelcoh]

A social media clip to undercut social media clips... at least when it comes to "War Crimes in Israel & Gaza."

Grateful to speak with Professor Michael Newton of @vanderbiltlaw, a law of war expert, about the conflict in Gaza. https://t.co/3rAr4jsHf5 #IsraelGazaWar #WarCrimes @M@MANewton84 @TalksOnLaw

[Open to Debate @OpentoDebateOrg]

@TalksOnLaw @LannyDavis @azarilaw @JohnDonvan @joelcoh Register here to join us virtually: https://t.co/P4NNyrMvVL

[Open to Debate @OpentoDebateOrg]

TODAY - Join our virtual courtroom @ 12:15 PM EST to engage with legal experts, and hear both sides of the argument for our Mock Trial: Is @realDonaldTrump Guilty in the January 6th Case?

Prosecutor: @LannyDavis
Defense Attorney: @azarilaw @ThePresumption
Cross examiners: Joel Cohen @TalksOnLaw and @RDEliason @GWLaw
Judge's Chair: @JohnDonvan

Register now and become a virtual juror. https://t.co/yNeQBWt863

[joel c @joelcoh]

For the international law nerds, this was part of a super interesting long-form convo with @DuncanHollis. https://t.co/5UwHMPOqiq

[Talks On Law @TalksOnLaw]

Does a Russian #cyberattack on U.S. infrastructure cross into 'Act of War' territory? Join us for a 6min explainer with Prof. @DuncanHollis of @TempleLaw. As the prof explains... "Death and destruction are the benchmarks!" 💀 https://t.co/BWRo9ygHAJ #InternationalLaw #Cybersecurity @joelcoh

[joel c @joelcoh]

@NaomiCahn, sounds like a great topic for another @TalksOnLaw… eh?

[UVA Law School @UVALaw]

.@RutgersLaw Prof. Reid Weisbord says Prof. @naomicahn’s co-authored paper “breaks new ground” by analyzing family law’s failure to serve elderly populations. @clarehuntington @IReadJotwell @YaleLJournal https://t.co/kaAglFAPDq

[joel c @joelcoh]

If you’ve heard of the case NYSRPA v. Bruen, you prob know that it is bad - or great!? …but if you’d like to understand it first, @jacobdcharles gives possibly the best summary of the case out there and tells @talksonlaw exactly what it changed. https://t.co/Tz67XIlLdf

(in collab with @DukeFirearmsLaw @dukelaw)

[joel c @joelcoh]

I called him on his vacation and legendary Prof. Ted Shaw delivers a 🔥 1hr+ interview… from his car… at the beach.

Shaw explains how SCOTUS forced colleges to drop ‘affirmative action’ in favor of First Amendment protected ‘diversity programs’ and then cancels both.

[Talks On Law @TalksOnLaw]

“Cynically brilliant or brilliantly cynical!” Prof Ted Shaw of @unc_law critiques the plaintiffs winning strategy in SFFA v. Harvard.

Catch the full conversation about the case that changed the meaning of the 14th Amendment when it comes to racial diversity programs: https://t.co/KmBu4g1t1u(@unc @Harvard @joelcoh) Join the discussion!