I personally believe we are a year away from major price appreciation. Some extremely important aspects of the XRP Ledger will be deployed soon but the institutions will need a half year to test before they adopt. Adoption drives price action.
Here's a quick list of what was released this year and what's coming:
Passed:
PermissionedDomains — credential-based groups for restricted access
TokenEscrow — escrow for tokens (not just XRP)
PermissionedDEX — order books limited to approved groups
PermissionDelegation — accounts can grant limited powers to others without sharing keys
Batch — bundle 2–8 transactions that execute together
fixCleanup3_4_0 — security fix (stopped burn-only accounts from minting tokens) + accounting cleanups
Pending, hopeful for this year:
SingleAssetVault + LendingProtocol — native on-ledger vaults and fixed-term lending
Pending most likely next year:
ConfidentialTransfer — private/confidential token transfers
DynamicMPT / Sponsor — more flexible multi-purpose tokens and fee sponsorship
He did a lifetime of work and deserves a payout earlier than any of us. He clearly owned enough units to take profit over the years. Anyone that has a problem with this is not thinking through this properly
He’s no spring chicken either. What food does it do to die with 26 million tokens in a wallet?
@Sksj002 If these stories were told properly he’d still have a job. Most of us are sick of the main characters. It would be nice to get a smaller street level story that’s told well
Summary of the document (“Ripple vs. Corruption”)
The post argues that XRP has unique legal clarity in the U.S. and that the broader crypto market (especially Bitcoin and Tether) has been shaped by selective regulation, Chinese-linked entities, Epstein-related influence, and unbacked stablecoin activity.
Core legal claim on XRP
• XRP is described as the first coin with “full legal clarity.” It is formally a digital asset, not a cryptocurrency.
• In the SEC case, Judge Torres ruled that Ripple’s programmatic (exchange) sales of XRP were not investment contracts/securities under the Howey test. Direct institutional sales violated securities laws, but XRP itself was not deemed inherently a security.
• The post notes that Ripple was the first major U.S. company sued by the SEC and that the company ultimately prevailed after years of litigation.
Allegations of selective enforcement
• The author contrasts Ripple’s treatment with Prometheum (described as a Chinese-linked entity focused on Ethereum). Prometheum received a rare special-purpose broker-dealer license for digital asset securities.
• Claims include prior Chinese investment/technology ties (specifically Wanxiang), a 2014 White House meeting involving then-Vice President Biden with Wanxiang energy executives connected to Hunter Biden’s overseas dealings, and on-chain links from a Prometheum-associated wallet to domains such as “killtrump.crypto.”
Epstein files and ecosystem influence
• The post cites Epstein-related emails and documents. One email states that “Ripple, and Jed’s new stellar are bad for the ecosystem” and damage the company by having investors backing “two horses in the same race.”
• A later email is interpreted as evidence of coordinating (“syncing”) Stellar while buying out competition and labeling it fraud.
• The author outlines a claimed influence chain: Epstein → MIT → Digital Currency Initiative (Obama administration) → Bitcoin Core → Tether → Ethereum Core and later altcoins/scams. This is presented as the “horse” in the race.
Tether and Bitcoin price support
• Tether is described as having printed unbacked USDT since 2014, using those tokens to buy Bitcoin and create artificial demand and inflated prices.
• Claims include Epstein-linked investment in Crypto Currency Partners (which helped found Tether) and that Howard Lutnick (who managed Tether reserves) was on Epstein’s island.
• Court documents from the long-running Tether/Bitfinex litigation are cited as showing extensive evidence of the practice, with a comparatively thin defense. The post frames this as the largest “dollar” in crypto never being fully real, distorting the entire market.
Broader framing
• The author links unbacked liquidity to national-security risks (sanctions evasion, dark-market funding, cross-border movement outside traditional banking controls).
• A military document titled roughly “Cryptocurrencies as a Threat to U.S. Homeland Security Interests” is referenced.
• The post argues that properly regulated U.S. options (including RLUSD and supporting American banks aligned with Executive Order 13772) are emerging and that the old model is under pressure. It ends by stating that the market cannot survive the truth about the mechanics of the dominant crypto “dollar.”
Overall tone and purpose: The document is explicitly pro-Ripple/XRP. It presents a narrative of uneven regulatory enforcement, alleged foreign and Epstein-linked influence favoring Bitcoin/Ethereum/Tether, and market distortion via unbacked stablecoins, while positioning XRP and related regulated products as the compliant alternative. Some points (the Torres ruling) are grounded in public court outcomes; other connections (specific wallet links, the extent of Epstein’s role, intent behind domain names, etc.) are presented as the author’s interpretation of records and on-chain data.
Nou kenbe pwomès nou…
Nou detwi kay Lanmò San Jou ak katye jeneral gang 400 Mawozo a.
Pifò ladan yo kouri ale san yo pa menm eseye goumen.
Ala lach yo lach! 🥲
@the5blairs@beyond_broke Word has it that his company won’t make it past February if price doesn’t appreciate. He needs to believe. They are out of runway from what I’ve heard