Joseph Palomares

American

[Stew Peters @realstewpeters]

Fort Huachuca image search data shows repeated geo-specific spikes for top DIA, CENTCOM, Crane weapons/tech & Kirk security/comms figures in the weeks/days before Sept 9.

These are the exact people who’d need escort, ID & coordination at America’s premier Army intel base.

[Stew Peters @realstewpeters]

There's only one reason all of these people would be Google Image searched from Fort Huachuca in the days and weeks before Charlie was murdered.

The betrayal is unfathomable.

@AndrewKolvet, not even you, a serial liar, can explain this away.

[theleahfiles @leahfiles]

BREAKING: THE SENATE BLOCKED THE NDAA which is rare. That means no Section 219 for now (merging militaries with Israel) 🙏 But they didn’t block it for that reason, they blocked it because Trump resumed military action in Iran. BUT, this is unprecedented and we have some time to get them to remove 219.
So, I'll take it as a win for today :)

[theleahfiles @leahfiles]

A federal judge just ruled that Trump's $10B IRS lawsuit was fake: "not brought to vindicate rights; it was brought to manipulate the judicial process."
She voided the settlement, sanctioned the lawyers, and flagged Todd Blanche to the New York bar.
And her verdict on Blanche's sworn testimony to the Senate: "at best, misleading and, at worst, disingenuous."
Blanche's confirmation hearing to be Attorney General is in 24 hours. A judge caught him deceiving the Senate. Now the Senate votes on whether that's disqualifying or a job qualification.
Question for the Senate, are you going to allow this lying child pr*dator protector to walk all over you??

[Baron Coleman @baroncoleman]

Hey, @AndrewKolvet, do you believe the staff at Cowboy's Smokehouse who place Tyler Robinson in Panguitch just before 10p on Sept 10? If not, why not?

If so, how do you explain the alleged text messages Tyler sent Lance saying he was watching a cop in Orem before midnight?

Panguitch is three hours away.

Easy question if the case is as airtight as you say.

[Ian Carroll @IanCarrollShow]

The 4k footage psyop by TPUSA was crazy to watch. Even though the court transcripts clearly say that it was exhibit 12.1 which was already introduced and rejected by judge Graff.

They made exhibit 12.4 out of the same footage and showed it the next morning. We’ve already seen it

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

They are now all backtracking and saying “we meant the video shows him in the prone position! There was no shot”.
These dummies didn’t realize that both videos, 12.4 (original compilation) and 12.1 (enhanced compilation) were already debated, explained and shown on day two of the trial.

It really is a study is how dishonest influencers are willing to be for money.

[Joe Kent @joekent16jan19]

As the war in Iran escalates, it’s critical to remember the role Israel played in drawing us into this mess: Israel convinced Trump that assassinating the Ayatollah would result in a swift U.S. victory, similar to the removal of Maduro from Venezuela.

Now, despite the obvious and concerning security and sovereignty implications, our own Congress is trying to merge our military w/ Israel:

https://t.co/9rdvpWiheu

[theleahfiles @leahfiles]

Let's expose the fraud playbook TPUSA's structure follows, one person at a time.
First up, Tyler Bowyer.

Fraud within organizations, especially when dealing with executives, is more often than not, structural. The goal isn't to steal a lump sum, it's to build a system where money moves constantly among related entities so that no single document ever shows the whole picture, insider pay is relabeled as arm's-length business expense, and the ultimate recipient is hidden behind a layer. You don't write yourself a check. You'd design exactly what I have been seeing across all TPUSA entities.

Here's what Tyler Bowyer's playbook looks like:

1. On his own charity's return, Bowyer is the Chief Operating Officer AND its #1 outside “vendor”. $288,255 for “COO SERVICES,” invoiced from his house.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: a salary gets audited and a vendor invoice doesn't. Executive pay triggers board sign-off, comparability studies, reasonableness tests, an excise tax. A “purchased service” melts into the expense pile. So you stop being an employee getting paid and start being a company getting hired by yourself. Billing it from your house is the tell: there's no firm on the other end. It's you, writing invoices to a charity you run....

2. His pay is split across three entities. $288K from the charity, $88K from the political arm, $0 from TPUSA. Total: ~$376K.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: everyone who might catch you pulls one filing at a time. Put the whole number on one return and it draws the excess-comp tax and the headline. Slice it across three affiliates and each piece looks modest. You're not hiding the money, you're hiding the total, and betting nobody cross-references three separate 990s. They usually don't, which is why it's one of the first things I do.

3. His public role is politics, he's COO of Turning Point Action, the (c)(4) political arm. Yet the tax-deductible (c)(3) charity pays him roughly three times what the political arm does.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: charity money is the cheapest money in the building. It's tax-deductible, so it's easier to raise and comes in bigger amounts. If a person's real work is political and you load that salary onto the charity, you're paying for work the charity is legally barred from doing, with subsidized dollars, and the donors wrote off politics on their taxes without knowing it. You push every cost onto the entity with the cheapest money and the least scrutiny for that line. Whether this split reflects real charitable work or a misallocation is exactly what an audit would settle, and it's the first thing I'd pull his time records for.

4. The charity paying him takes 100% of its money as grants from TPUSA, spends nearly all of it, and holds nothing. In its 2023 return it booked $3.7 million in salaries against zero employees on its federal wage form. The next year it reported 124.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: a satellite entity is a second set of books you fully control. Money leaves the closely-watched flagship as a "grant", which looks charitable, lands in a smaller entity nobody audits hard, and gets spent there on payroll and insiders with a fraction of the oversight. And millions in salaries booked against zero reported employees is the classic ghost-employee signature, wages to people who may not exist, or to insiders dressed as staff. Maybe 2023 was a filing error. That's the innocent read. But a swing from zero to 124 is the exact anomaly a forensic examiner reconciles first, because it's also how payroll fraud hides.

5. Within a few months of Charlie Kirk's assassination, as control of a nine-figure network changed hands, Tyler Bowyer opened five companies all within 54 days of one another. Four are anonymous Wyoming LLCs using one Cheyenne "mailbox". One is named “Vote LLC.” One is “Tyler Bowyer Inc.,” at the same address he already invoices the charity from.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: the entire purpose of an anonymous LLC is that no one can prove YOU got paid. Send money to “Victory Advisors LLC” and the trail dead-ends at a mail drop. Stand up a personal corporation at your billing address and your fees now flow through a company with one more wall between the cash and your name. And you build the pipes before the money moves, right when the org is in transition and everyone's looking at the funeral instead of the filings.

6. He co-owns Resolute Media, run out of a building on the charity's campus, and chairs Superfeed, the for-profit the movement pays, with Erika Kirk's own mother on the board.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: self-dealing is invisible when the counterparty wears a different name. You don't embezzle from the nonprofit, you sell to it, at your price, through a company you own. The charity pays “Superfeed” or “Resolute,” it reads as a normal vendor, and the profit lands with the same people who run the charity.

7. On their signed federal returns, TPUSA and Turning Point Action both answered "No" to the question regulators scan for self-dealing: any business transactions with an officer, or with a company an officer controls.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: that box is the one you most need blank, because a "yes" invites the audit you're avoiding. And here's the defense they'll reach for, so let me get ahead of it. They'll say the "No" is technically correct: officer pay gets reported elsewhere, and this schedule only captures a company an officer owns more than 35% of. Fine. But that's exactly the problem. Those thresholds are the exits. Officer comp is excluded. A 34% stake is excluded. So a person can be paid by the charity, own a slice of the vendors it hires, and chair a company it does business with, and still, truthfully, check "No." The schedule built to expose insider dealing has doors an insider can walk right through. A "No" here doesn't mean there's nothing to see. It means the only way to see it is the one thing they haven't handed over: the ownership percentages and the payment records. That, again, is the audit.

The pattern: Every one of these findings align to what someone committing fraud would do and reveals a behavioral pattern: to make the money harder to see, the recipient harder to name, and the total harder to add up. Real fraud isn't loud. It's a hundred small, individually-defensible decisions that all lean the same way, toward the insiders and away from the light. One of these could be considered a "quirk", but all seven, across every entity, for years, it is a design.

I can't prove intent from a tax form. Intent lives in the bank records and the operating agreements, and those aren't public. But every structural choice here is the one a person with something to hide would make. That is the reason to open the books.

Tyler Bowyer (and all of TPUSA, but I'll get there in the following parts) needs a real forensic audit, by the IRS, by the Arizona AG, by anyone with the subpoena power to pull what a 990 will never show you.

They built the structure betting nobody would read the filings or pay attention. I'm paying attention.

Part 2 coming next. Who do you want? Erika Kirk or Andrew Kolvet?

[Joe Kent @joekent16jan19]

This week the Senate will vote to merge our military’s most sensitive & secretive capabilities with Israel. This merger is buried within the massive NDAA and they’re hoping you won’t notice.

Merging our military with a foreign country is a treasonous betrayal of our sovereignty.

Call your senators & tell them to vote no on the NDAA until the merger w/ Israel (section 219) is taken out.

Tell them that we will never support merging our military with a foreign nation.

The senate switchboard number is: [phone].

[theleahfiles @leahfiles]

The Senate cannot confirm Todd Blanche on Wednesday, because Todd Blanche is actively covering up the Epstein files.

Thirty miles south of Santa Fe there are 10,000 acres called Zorro Ranch. Jeffrey Epstein owned it for a quarter century. Survivors say girls were flown there and abused there. There was a tip about girls buried in the hills, disturbing enough that the state searched with cadaver dogs this spring.

In all those years, no law enforcement agency ever searched that ranch. Not once. In 2019 the FBI raided Epstein's Manhattan townhouse and his island the week of his arrest. The ranch? Never. And when New Mexico's attorney general built his own case that year, with victim statements and suspects beyond Epstein and Maxwell, federal prosecutors called and told him to stand down. They promised to share their evidence for state charges later. His words, on the record: "I don't think that they were forthright, and I don't think that they were operating in good faith." Epstein died and the case of Zorro Ranch died with him.

This February, New Mexico tried again. A new attorney general, Raul Torrez, reopened the case: the only active criminal investigation into Zorro Ranch anywhere on earth. In March his investigators became the first law enforcement officers to ever search the property. To charge anyone still living, he needs one thing from Washington: the unredacted files. The names of victims, witnesses, and co-conspirators that are blacked out in the public release.

He asked on February 13. He asked again. And again. Five times, plus a formal legal letter, plus an attempted meeting in Washington. On June 30 he sent a letter addressed to Todd Blanche, by name: 130+ days of silence. The delay is "unreasonable under any rule of reason." And this sentence, which should be read aloud at Wednesday's hearing: "Every avenue of investigation that begins with a redacted name, a blacked-out face or an obscured date is an avenue that ends before it begins." Statutes of limitation are dying while the files sit in a building in Washington.

The man that letter is addressed to is Todd Blanche, the acting Attorney General of the United States.

Before he ran the Justice Department, Todd Blanche had exactly one job: personal criminal defense lawyer to Donald Trump. Trump's PAC paid his firm nearly $10,000,000. Trump appears in more than 5,300 of the released Epstein documents. The Justice Department's own ethics chief told Blanche, in writing, in his first two weeks, to recuse himself from his former client's matters. He refused. Then he took personal control of everything Epstein.

Personal control looks like this. He flew to Florida and spent nine private hours with Ghislaine Maxwell, the only living witness who knows everything. She came out announcing Trump did nothing wrong. A week later she was moved to a minimum-security camp that Bureau of Prisons policy says sex offenders can't be in. Under oath, Blanche described it as "low-security to low-security." That is false on the Bureau's own records. She has made it public that she'll "speak fully and honestly" if she gets clemency. Think about that...

Personal control looks like this. When a 2015 DEA memo surfaced in the files tying Epstein and 14 redacted names to drug and prostitution money, about $50 million in flagged wire transfers, a senator demanded the unredacted version. The DEA administrator was ready to hand it over. Senator Wyden says Blanche personally stopped him. Blanche's response was to call a sitting senator a fabricator. The memo is still sealed today. And the 43-year-old task force that wrote it, the one that caught El Chapo? Blanche shut the whole thing down.

Personal control looks like this. His department withheld FBI interviews of a woman whose abuse allegation mentioned Trump, and quietly deleted one from the public database after release. It came back only when reporters caught it. He certified to Congress, in writing, that nothing was withheld for political reasons. A federal judge has now ruled, in the government's own words, that "the Attorney General has conceded that he is in violation of the Act." Blanche's answer to the unsealing order was to refuse and ask for 60 more days. His answer to you was: "We are not sitting on a single piece of paper."

One man sits between the Epstein files and every investigation trying to open them. That man was paid ten million dollars by the most famous name in them.

And Epstein is only the first file. The deep dive covers the rest: the tax immunity he signed for Trump's family, "FOREVER BARRED," worth $600M+, that a judge is now probing as a possible fraud on the court.

The prosecution a federal judge dismissed as vindictive, finding Blanche "started the investigation to implicate" the defendant.

The bodycam of an opposition mayor arrested "per the deputy attorney general of the United States" as the cameras were ordered off.

The armed marshals at a whistleblower's door the night before her testimony.

This is a dangerous man. Not a partisan, a dangerous man: one who has proven he will point the entire machinery of American justice at protecting a single client and burying a single story, and who is days away from owning that machinery permanently.

The hearing is Wednesday, 9am. Your two senators decide. Tag them below and ask one question: "Will you confirm the man covering up the Epstein files before the Inspector General tells you whether he lied to you?"

@SenThomTillis @SenatorCollins @LisaMurkowski @JohnCornyn @SenBillCassidy @HawleyMO: you said you had concerns. This is what they look like on paper. I'll email you the full 20 page report.

Repost so no senator can say they didn't know.

[theleahfiles @leahfiles]

Hey Senate, did the due diligence for you on Todd Blanche. Here are 16 questions you should ask him on Wednesday.

The deep dive is up on Substack (link in bio).

1. Joseph Tirrell, the department’s senior ethics lawyer, advised you in March 2025 to recuse from Trump matters. You told this committee under oath you would follow the ethics experts. Why didn’t you? And was Mr. Tirrell removed after giving that advice?

2. You testified in February 2025 that you had no knowledge of the Adams dismissal decision. Ms. Sassoon’s letter says Mr. Bove may have spoken with you about it two weeks earlier. Ten senators have asked the Inspector General to investigate your testimony. Will you commit, under oath, that you had no communications about the Adams case before that hearing, and will you waive privilege over any that exist?

3. You signed the April 7, 2025 crypto enforcement memo while holding up to 485,000 dollars in crypto, in apparent breach of your own ethics agreement. The department says this was "cleared in advance." Who cleared it? Produce the written clearance.

4. Why did you personally interview Ghislaine Maxwell rather than assign line prosecutors? Was any FBI agent in the room? Did you discuss her custody placement, her habeas petition, or clemency in any form? And why was her transfer to minimum security, in tension with BOP policy, never documented to Senator Whitehouse in eleven months?

5. Judge Sullivan found you conceded violating the Epstein Files Transparency Act. You told the public you were "not sitting on a single piece of paper." Which statement is true? And why is the National Security Division redacting a sex trafficking file?

6. Judge Crenshaw found you "started the investigation to implicate Abrego" to justify the deportation. Your office’s own emails are in the record. Do you dispute the emails? Will you produce Ben Schrader’s objection memo, the one that never reached Washington?

7. Body camera footage shows a federal agent arresting Mayor Baraka "per the deputy attorney general of the United States" while ordering cameras off. Did you order that arrest? Did you know about the camera instruction? You have had ten months to answer.

8. You signed a document permanently barring tax enforcement against the family whose PAC paid your firm nearly ten million dollars, without court approval and without recusal. Will you rescind it in writing? If the fund is truly dead, why did the government refuse Judge Brinkema’s request for sworn declarations, due July 17?

9. Your financial disclosure lists a confidential client in a pending grand jury proceeding. An Attorney General cannot supervise a grand jury matter involving his own secret client. Who is it, and from what will you recuse?

10. Ms. Oyer says you fired her within hours of her refusal to recommend restoring Mel Gibson’s gun rights, then sent armed marshals to her home before her testimony. What is your account, and will you produce the directive that sent them?

11. You testified in May that Maxwell went "from a low-security prison to a low-security prison." FPC Bryan is a minimum security camp and her placement required a waiver of BOP policy. Do you correct that testimony today?

12. Your February 14, 2026 letter certified to Congress that no Epstein records were withheld for reputational or political reasons. NPR then documented withheld and quietly removed FBI interviews concerning an allegation that mentioned Trump. Was your certification accurate when you signed it?

13. Judge Brinkema said one sworn declaration that the fund is dead would end the litigation. You testified it is dead. Why won’t you swear it? Will you sign that declaration before this Committee votes?

14. New Mexico is running the only active criminal investigation into the Zorro Ranch. Its attorney general says your department has withheld the unredacted records for more than 130 days while statutes of limitation erode. Will you produce them this week? If not, name the legal basis, in writing.

15. Senator Wyden says the DEA administrator was ready to hand Congress the unredacted 2015 OCDETF memo naming Epstein and fourteen others in a drug and prostitution financial investigation, and that you stopped him. You called that fabricated. Then release the memo. Will you commit to releasing the unredacted memo to this Committee, and to answering Senator Whitehouse’s Operation Trip Knot letter, before the vote?

16. You eliminated OCDETF over the objection of both parties’ appropriators, transferring 5,000 cases to an organization that did not yet exist. Under what authority did you decline to spend funds Congress appropriated, and did you seek an Impoundment Control Act opinion first?

- Leah

[theleahfiles @leahfiles]

Lindsey Graham’s sister was announced to take his place. I looked into her and why they made they would make this ridiculous decision.
Also, I’m very sick so apologies for the scratchy voice 😭

[theleahfiles @leahfiles]

There is a group of ex-Military idiots with SDE on here who write lengthy articles about me being "fake" or a conspiracy fraud. Interestingly enough, the latest attack was brought on after I discussed Toka.
But, unlike them, I bring receipts, and Toka is real and a threat to us.

Toka was founded in 2018 by former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and former IDF cyber chief Brig. Gen. Yaron Rosen. They have offices in Tel Aviv and Washington, DC. It's overseen by the Israeli Defense Ministry and backed by Andreessen Horowitz, Entree Capital, and Dell Technologies.

What does it do? Well, according to Toka's OWN pitch deck (screenshot attached), obtained by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz and verified by an independent technical expert, Toka sells governments the ability to:

1. "discover and access security and smart cameras"
2. "stream and control cameras" in a targeted area over time
3. gather intel from "live or recorded videos"
4. "alter feeds" of audio and visual recordings
5. enable the "masking of on-site activities" during "covert operations"

They can alter any camera feed and mask what's happening on camera both live and archived.

And here's the part that should scare everyone: Toka's tech leaves no forensic trace. No fingerprint on the device. Unlike NSO's Pegasus or Intellexa's Predator, an independent hacker who reviewed the documents found Toka's manipulation leaves no evidence a hack ever happened. Old footage can be deleted. New footage can be changed, and you'd never know.

Which is why I think the defense in Tyler Robinson's case needs to genuinely question the footage that could have been altered.

It doesn't stop at CCTV. The documents describe targeting webcams, IoT devices, and cars (extracting a vehicle's location over time). The cameras in question are the ones on street corners, in parking lots, malls, hotels, airports, and increasingly, homes, laptops, and baby monitors.

A human rights lawyer who reviewed the reporting called it "dystopian," warning of a world where "you're accused of something and you don't know if the evidence against you is real."

So, the multiple posts about me being a fake for reporting on Toka when it's pretty common knowledge makes me wonder what they are being paid to hide...

[Lara Logan @laralogan]

Well look what I stumbled across…

[Joseph Palomares @joep1776]

@5149jamesli Isreal is flying their flag at 1/2 mast for their most beloved AIPAC member.

[Joseph Palomares @joep1776]

@LibertyLockPod When need to send more of our favorite neo con house members to inspect more Ukrainian facilities.

[Travis @NihiloX]

🚨Baron Coleman just uncovered a crucial detail that undermines the 30-06 narrative completely!

According to this expert’s testimony, the range for size of the bullet recovered from Charlie was between .286 and .301 inches in diameter. 👀

On the other hand, a 30-06 bullet is a projectile that measures .308 inches in diameter.

In other words, there's no match!

This expert’s testimony eliminates the possibility that the bullet was a 30-06, thereby exonerating Tyler Robinson of all charges.

[Amiri King @AmiriKing]

Listen to me and listen good.

I used to train the snipers that trained the snipers in the military.

I have shot all 3628 different variations of .30-06 rifles.

ALL OF THEM. MULTIPLE TIMES.

I literally have a certificate on my wall from the .30-06 Rifle Shooters Organization.

A .30-06 bullet will make a human head LITERALLY implode simply by whizzing past one.

I’ve seen it happen in Bosnia.
I’ve seen it happen in Iran.
I’ve seen it happen in Destin Florida.

If a .30-06 round hits any part of the human body, the entire body will EXPLODE.

And here’s a little fun fact for all the internet experts out there:

- 30 stands for how many deaths one round can cause.

- 06 is a humans chance of survival if they are shot with one of these rounds.

So shut your fucking mouths if you don’t know what you’re talking about.

[Joe Rogan Podcast News @joeroganhq]

Aaron Rodgers on the government: "Get off my computer get off my cameras, get off my ring camera, take down all this stupid f*ck. They're inching closer to being 1984 where they have some sort of TV set in your house that watches you."