Joe Singleton

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

Seems to be sensitive to the User Agent. Bad news for Linux users...

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

Is https://t.co/5nrJSo2L3y homepage supposed to be showing lorem ipsum placeholder text? Seems like a mistake?

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

Thesis stuff is in a separate repo, with a big gap in August when I was away at KR'22

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

Making sure all my phd stuff is backed up on GitHub before university IT wipe my laptop. Quite a few commits, with a tiny blip of viva prep at the end...

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

@ha1fling I had the same thought... Didn't really like Zotero etc so wrote my own (very very minimal) tool: https://t.co/CSfQO1r6NO. Pretty basic but it was fun and worked well enough!

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

@ha1fling @mukau71 @StevenSchockae2 Thanks Jenny! And good luck with your own phd ☺️

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

Pleased to say I passed my PhD viva! Thanks to my supervisor @mukau71 and examiners @StevenSchockae2 and Andreas Herzig.

Thesis is now online at https://t.co/s8Cl5OW7HY

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

@Seb4Ko @mukau71 @StevenSchockae2 Thanks Sébastien!

[Cardiff KRR @cardiff_krr]

📢The good news in the group continue📢 The work by our PhD student Joe Singleton @joesingo2 on Truth-Tracking with Non-Expert Information Sources gets the best student paper award at NMR @FLoC2022🏆🏆 - under the brilliant supervision of Richard Booth! @mukau71

[Cardiff KRR @cardiff_krr]

More good news! Our members Joe Singleton and Richard Booth got a paper accepted to KR'22 @joesingo2 @mukau71. They look at a belief merging problem with multiple non-expert information sources. So, who is the expert? 🤔 https://t.co/Y4NJiNHcOQ

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

Main results are a link between this logic and S5 epistemic logic (expressing expertise in terms of *knowledge*) and a sound and complete axiomatisation

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

Great first two weeks at ESSLLI (@ESSLLI_official). On Thursday I presented my work "A Logic of Expertise" at the student session

Paper: https://t.co/YfeGsUU4C5
Slides: https://t.co/KEJLfnhowl

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

In the paper we introduce a modal logic framework for talking about the expertise of an information source. We also look at how information might be false, but becomes true when discarding the parts on which the source has no expertise

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

@JDHamkins One thing to consider is that having a piece captured is not always a bad thing, provided you can recapture in a favourable way. So if the attacked player wants to allow a trade of pieces, they have incentive to lose in the subgame(s). As you already noted, this seems undesirable

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

An example of a bipartite tournament is students vs questions in an exam: students do not go head-to-head, so ranking them based on exam performance can only be done by looking at the indirect comparisons via the questions

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

The video for mine and Richard's (@mukau71) AAMAS '21 paper is now online!

Video: https://t.co/iAwtzQVnDs
Paper: https://t.co/W4B9U4gFZz

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

In it we look at rankings for bipartite tournaments, where two different kinds of "players" compete indirectly via matches against the opposite kind. We mainly focus at properties of *chain editing* (a graph editing problem), adapted as a tournament ranking method

[Edward Gomez 🤖🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇪🇺 @zemogle]

Highly recommend @JOSS_TheOJ for publishing software! Feat. @joesingo2

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

Happy to announce our paper "Rankings for Bipartite Tournaments via Chain Editing" was accepted at #aamas2021

Preprint is now on arXiv: https://t.co/Xpc0adWQYh

Joint work with Richard Booth (@mukau71)

[Joe Singleton @joesingo2]

@firthcity Thanks, David. Agree about setting the method out in advance - any team who goes down in an alternative ranking will surely not agree to it now. But would be good to have a system in place for future, especially given the £££ that is at stake for promotion, relegation, Europe...