John McMullan

Cricket is the best sport in the world. Truth will always matter.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Je vais même double down.

Sans Peter Thiel, je pense que le projet globaliste aurait gagné.

Pourquoi ?

Parce que c'est lui qui a soutenu Trump dès 2015, quand tout Silicon Valley le traitait de paria.

Et il a tenu. Il n'a pas plié quand ça coûtait cher socialement de tenir cette ligne.

Et c'est lui qui a trouvé et propulsé JD Vance — celui qui porte aujourd'hui la ligne la plus claire, la plus solide, la plus cohérente de toute la scène politique occidentale.

Je persiste et je signe :

La team Musk / Thiel / Karp, avec une partie de la PayPal Mafia, est en train de sauver l'Occident des bureaucrates.

[Barry Wall @HeadWarriorTWM]

https://t.co/5iopVjYbRV

New KCSIE is out and it still has trans and Gender in it.

Leaving a loophole.

It allows a school to consider a request from a child or parent and, after a documented best-interests process involving parents, to agree limited support for the child presenting as the opposite sex .
It keeps a door open, however narrow. Schools that want to keep facilitating gender ideology will use it.

The correct position is that schools should have no role in facilitating or accommodating social transition of any degree.

It should be taught against.
As a cult.

Biological sex is real, single-sex spaces are non-negotiable, and children should not be socially transitioned by adults at school.

What an utter nightmare.

Not one iota of this crackers belief must remain.
@SafeSchools_UK @ProtectTeach @NoSecretLessons @Transgendertrd @BayswaterSG @OurDutyUK
@WomensRightsNet

[Clare Page : No Secret Lessons @NoSecretLessons]

They still don’t get it.

They’re trying to apply ordinary democratic processes to stop a perverse, authoritarian cult that will never play by the rules of a liberal democracy nor adhere to reason.

This Bill does not have ‘flaws’, it is just naked totalitarianism to serve perverse needs.

Our problem is that our leading feminist opposition to this has gone along without naming the true purposes of that cult, whilst treating it like a genuine political opposition to be reasoned with - one which is due at least some rights in a live-and-let-live liberal society. This is a huge mistake.

We have to use the right words and address the underlying concepts and drives.

Fetish, delusion, mental illness, paedophilia, sadism, pornography, addiction, identity fraud, queer Marxism, sedition, Munchausen’s by Proxy, medical fraud, international corruption, corporate greed, population control, transhumanism… a plethora of truly dark motives, all of which should be placed firmly outside the boundaries of a civilised, democratic society.

This should not be a question of a few feminists vs a few transvestites trying to unhappily share a rights based system together - this is a matter of retaining truth, reason, liberty and self government so that we can reassert child safeguarding and protect our families, borders and national security in the face of these profoundly dark forces.

We need all hands to the deck on this - it is not a feminist issue - our children’s safety and everyone’s liberty rests upon it.

[Anglo Futurism Capital LP 🇬🇧🐿️ @RollingHedge]

Burnham says housing is wrecking the public finances. Correct. Watch him make it worse. Here is the arithmetic he managed to skip, line by line…

Build cost. Sticking up a three bed runs north of £220k (to £280k) before you buy a single square foot of land or book a penny of profit. That figure is set by things like bricklayers and the spot price of copper.

Sale price. Stack land, levies, finance and a margin that keeps the builder solvent on top, and your bog standard Bovis shitbox semi changes hands at £330k to £360k. Minimum.

Wages. Median full time pay is £39,300. Median household income lands at £36,700. Hold those two in your head, because everything below is measured against them.

Inflation. CPI is bullshit, inflation is not running at anything close to 2.8%. Treat that the way you would treat any figure a department gets to design its own basket to produce. Strip out the imported gadgets getting cheaper and the hedonic fiddle that pretends this year's phone counts as a pay rise, look only at what a family cannot dodge, rent, energy, food, childcare, council tax, insurance, and the real rate sits north of 6 or 7%. And I’m being nice. Pay rose against that by a rounding error. Sterling got debased. House prices in this range haven’t come down.

Groceries. Feeding a family of four runs roughly £8,000 a year (conservatively), and anyone who tells you it is done on £60 a week is either lying or living on tins of beans.

Energy. Price cap goes to £1,862 in July, and a family rattling around a three bed burns more than Ofgem's tidy typical household, so call it £2,000 gone before your new air con unit goes on / heating goes on in the winter.

Rent, after housing costs. A three bed outside London goes for about £1,450 a month, £17,400 a year, and every pound of it buys precisely nothing. Renters hand over a third of gross pay for the privilege of standing still. Again this is lowball. It’s closer to £1,600+ in Reading (a good proxy for non salubrious London commute).

Nursery. After the free hours a full time place in England is about £7,400 a year per child, so a family with two little ones still waves goodbye to the thick end of £15,000. Funded for 38 weeks only, with a taper that bites as you climb, and £13k to £16k a head in Scotland or Wales.

Deposit. 10% on a £350k home is £35k. Out in the real world the average first time buyer now stumps up £59,000 and does it at the age of 34, which tells you how long it takes to save that while renting.

Mortgage. Put ten per cent down and you carry a £315k loan. At a realistic high LTV rate of around 5.5% that is roughly £1,800 a month over thirty years, before service charge, insurance and council tax.

Now the part Burnham will not say from a podium in Manchester.

To service that loan on bog standard 4.5x lending you need a household pulling about £70k, or £57k if a lender stretches to 5.5x, with the deposit sitting in the bank on top. Barely a fifth of UK households clear even £65k gross. Fewer still clear the £70k this actually needs, and among the young it is thinner still.

Of the 25-35 yr old crowd this home is supposedly built for, ownership has fallen from more than half in the 1990s to roughly a quarter or a third today, and most who got there leaned on family money.
First time buyers bunch into the top two income brackets. From the bottom fifth, 4% manage it. Strip out the bank of mum and dad and the slice of that generation who could buy this house on their own earnings sits somewhere in the low teens.

None of which is useless. Building council homes and moving a waiting list is a decent day's work, and somebody stuck on it will sleep easier for it. Trouble is, not one brick of that lowers the open market for two people on normal wages, which is the very fire he stood up to put out.

He has in effect clocked the right problem and gone after it with a tool built for a different job. Because, like most of the Labour Party, he is totally illiterate.

Classic.

[John McMullan @john_mcmullan]

@mrswaggytail @ThePosieParker Women work 66% of FTE hours, men 88%. Don’t be paid between 100 and 125 in the UK.

[John McMullan @john_mcmullan]

@DadRogd Presumably she would turn down the challenge and then her family would not be able to bear the shame and she would withdraw from public life. Oh… wait.

[Clare Page : No Secret Lessons @NoSecretLessons]

Don’t make the mistake of thinking this is a niche issue for those whose kids identify as ‘trans’ (which is awful enough) - this is a catastrophic attack on liberty of speech and conscience that will have ramifications for all of us.

This is not a drill, there must be universal push back and condemnation against this draft Bill.

[Paul @PaulSTEandM]

For years I knew this was a cult. But all cults have a main leader. This one didn't quite fit the mold.

Then I realised, it self replicates without a central cult leader. It metastasizes local cult leaders everywhere without direction from above. It's the perfect mind virus. These freaks are the local example of the child abusing nature of this poisonous cult.

It must be destroyed along with it's other critical social justice siblings.

The obvious next level up in this festering brood is EDI. Kill that 1st. Then look upwards towards ESG and it's parents. Weed killer needs to be deployed on all of it, not just one of the fruiting bodies.

[Simon Elmer @SimonElmer2022]

Since 2016, the Mayor of London has been Sadiq Khan, a second-generation Pakistani immigrant and devout Muslim. The current Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, is also a Pakistani Muslim. The leader of the Scottish Labour Party, Anas Sarwar, is a Pakistani Muslim. There are currently 26 Muslim Members of Parliament, 4 Muslim members of the Scottish Parliament, including the former First Minister of Scotland, Humza Yousaf. 2 members of the Welsh Parliament are Muslim. The Mayor of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, Lutfur Rahman, is a Muslim. The Mayor of the London Borough of Newham, Rokhsana Fiaz, is a Muslim. 2 London Assembly Members are Muslim. 18 peers in the House of Lords are Muslim. And in 2025, at least 8 ceremonial mayors, who do not wield executive power but whose role is to normalise the Islamisation of Britain, were Muslim.

The UK, however, is not only run by its politicians but also by its civil service and the army of administrators at every level of the state apparatus and civil society. Placing a Muslim in charge of Britain’s capital city for a decade is one very obvious way to implement the Islamisation of Britain. Placing a Muslim in the office of Home Secretary is another. Placing a Muslim at the head of Ofsted is another. But the infiltration of the UK state by Muslims goes far beyond the scores of Muslims who now sit at the head of our councils, in the mayoralties of our cities, in our legislature and in the House of Lords.

It’s largely unknown to the general public, but Muslims have created a network of political, civil, military, legal, police, media, educational, health, financial and charitable bodies working towards the Islamisation of the United Kingdom.

Within the UK’s Government and Civil Service there operate today the Home Office Islamic Network (HOIN), the FCDO (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development) Muslim Staff Network, the Civil Service Islamic Society (CSIS), the Civil Service Muslim Network (CSMN) and the Muslim Public Affairs Committee (MPACUK).

Within the UK military there operates the Armed Forces Muslim Association (AFMA).

Within the UK judiciary there operate the Association of Muslim Lawyers (AML), the Muslim Lawyers’ Hub and the Muslim Lawyers Action Group (MLAG).

Within the parallel Sharia judiciary there operate the Islamic Sharia Council (ISC), the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal (MAT) and the Muslim Law (Sharia) Council.

Within the UK’s police forces there operate the National Association of Muslim Police (NAMP), the Association of Muslim Police (AMP) at the Metropolitan Police, the West Yorkshire Association of Muslim Police (AMP), the Scottish Police Muslim Association (SPMA) and the City of London Police Association of Muslim Police (AMP).

Within UK media there operate the BBC Muslim Network, the Channel 4 Muslim Network, the ITV Muslim Staff Network Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM), Muslim Engagement and Development (MEND), the Islam Channel, British Muslim TV, Muslim Television Ahmadiyya International (MTA International), the Ummah Channel, Ahlebait TV and 5Pillars.

Within the UK’s education sector there operate the Muslim Teachers’ Association UK (MTAUK), the Association of Muslim Schools and Institutes (AMSI), the British Muslim Teachers’ Association and the Federation of Student Islamic Societies (FOSIS).

Within the UK’s health sector there operate the National Muslim Staff Network (NMSN) and the NHS Muslim Network.

Within the UK’s charities there operate the Islamic Relief UK, Muslim Hands UK, Muslim Aid, Ummah Welfare Trust (UWT), Muslim Global Relief, the National Zakat Foundation (NZF) and the Muslim Charity UK.

And within the parallel Sharia financial system there operate 5 fully Sharia-compliant banks (Al Rayan Bank, Gatehouse Bank, the Bank of London and the Middle East, United Bank Limited and the Ahil United Bank), as well as 25 conventional banks which offer Sharia finance alongside conventional finance.

Other nation-wide Islamic organisations operating in the UK include the Association of British Muslims (AoBM), the British Muslim Network (BMN), the Muslim Association of Britain (MAB), the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) and the Islamophobia Response Unit.

In my book I look at how these various Muslim organisations and their financial backers in the Islamic world work together to lobby the UK Government and Members of Parliament to write and pass legislation that furthers the Islamisation of Britain.

The most recent example of the influence of such Muslim groups on UK legislation is the UK Government’s adoption of the definition of anti-Muslim hatred and Islamophobia written by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims. An organisation composed exclusively of Muslims, including 21 Muslim MPs and 5 Muslim Peers, this APPG is funded by the Aziz Foundation, a charity founded in 2015 by Asif Aziz, a Malawi-born Muslim property developer and billionaire whose company, Criterion Capital, has investments worth £6 billion in Britain, and who, since 2024, has been a tax exile in Abu Dhabi.

Another indication of how these Muslim organisations operate closer to the corridors of power — indeed, with the offices stationed off them — is the Civil Service Muslim Network, which lists, among its stated aims, the following:

•Represent, support, connect and champion Muslim civil servants across government.
•Generate a better understanding of Islam within the Civil Service and challenge discrimination and misconceptions.
•Create a network of senior allies who recognise the lived experience of Muslim colleagues and help improve religious literacy and respect.

Doubtless I’m not the only British person who cannot understand why such a network should be required in the UK if Britain is still a secular society rather than one, as I believe, that is already operating under aspects of Sharia law modelled on its implementation in Pakistan; or why it should not only be tolerated but given a place in our civil service, except as a platform — one of many built in Britain and largely with the taxes of the British people — for the Islamisation of Britain.

As for Muslim organisations operating within our police forces and legal system, it is contrary to the principle of police being officers of UK law, the adjudication of courts over sentencing under that law, and of everyone in Britain, irrespective of their religion, being equal before the law. The two-tier policing of the British people, the decades-long cover-up of the Muslim rape-gang network operating in 149 constituencies that we know of across Britain, and the gross travesties of justice handed down by these courts to Muslim rapists, murderers and terrorists is further confirmation that the UK is, indeed, already operating under Sharia law.

Like the UK’s 85 known Sharia Courts, which oversee child marriages in contravention of UK law, these Muslim associations, Muslim societies, Muslim committees, Muslim councils, Muslim non-governmental organisations, Muslim APPGs and Muslim networks have created a civil service, legal system and police force that operates within, but independent from and contrary to, the laws of the UK, which they seek to change through political lobbying of our Parliament and Government. Again, this is consistent with Sections 4 and 14 of Pakistan’s Enforcement of Sharia Act, 1991, according to which ‘Laws [are] to be interpreted in the light of Sharia, and ‘The State shall take adequate measures for the Islamisation of the judicial system.’

Finally — although this list doesn’t approach exhausting the influence of Islam in British society — in addition to these organisations there exists within Britain a terrorist arm with links to the Muslim Brotherhood. This is a transnational Sunni Muslim organisation that was founded in Egypt in 1928 to promote Islam and Sharia Law.

Fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood known to be currently operating in Britain include the Cambridge Education and Training Center Ltd., IMA6INE Ltd., Wembley Tree Ltd., Waslaforall, Future Graduates Ltd., Yas for Investment and Real Estate, Holdco UK Properties Limited and Nafel Capital Partners, all of which have recently been proscribed by the United Arab Emirates as terrorist groups. Indeed, most of the organisations I’ve listed here are linked by varying degrees of separation to the Muslim Council of Britain and the Muslim Association of Britain, which themselves have links to the Muslim Brotherhood.

It is a measure of how far Britain’s Islamisation has advanced that this organisation operates freely in the UK while being banned as a terrorist organisation in many Muslim countries, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Syria, Jordan, Kenya, Bahrain, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and the United Arab Emirates, as well as in Russia.

Extraordinarily, in January 2026 the UAE announced that it was excluding UK universities from its approved list for state scholarships, citing the risk of Emirati citizens being radicalised by the Muslim Brotherhood operatng on British campuses. Universities where networks linked to the Muslim Brotherhood are reported to operate include the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) at the University of London, Queen Mary University of London, the University of Birmingham, the University of Manchester, the University of Leeds, the University of Bradford and the University of Newcastle. The same month, the US Department of State proscribed chapters of the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt, Lebanon and Palestine as designated terrorist organisations.

And there are consequences to harbouring and funding Islamic terrorists in the very country against which they launch their attacks. Six years ago, in 2020, there were 43,000 people on MI5’s terrorist watch list. After the mass migration of half a million Muslims to Britain and more than two-and-a-half years of weekly protests against the war in Gaza, the numbers can only have grown since then.

In 2024, Islamic terrorists accounted for 80% of UK police force’s counter-terror caseload. As of 31 March that year, 63% of prisoners in the UK arrested on terrorist-related charges were Islamic terrorists. Muslims have been responsible for 94% of all terrorism deaths, and 88% of terrorism-inflicted injuries, in Britain over the last 25 years. In the last 10 years, the percentages are even higher. One would never guess it from the relentless references to the threat from the mythical ‘far-Right’ by the UK Government and media, but MI5 today lists Islamic terrorism as ‘the most significant threat to the UK by volume’.

As anyone who has lived in Britain since 9/11 knows, this hasn’t happened overnight, and we have repeatedly ignored every warning to the contrary, as we continue to do today. In 2006, when the UK was led by the New Labour Government of Tony Blair and net migration to Britain had increased to over a quarter a million a year, the think-tank, Policy Exchange, published a report titled ‘When Progressives Treat With Reactionaries’, in which it argued that the British Foreign Office had already, in effect, become a front for The Muslim Brotherhood. Twenty years later, they have been proven right. Today, the UK is run by Muslims.

Extract from my new book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. If you want to know just how far down the path to becoming an Islamic State Britain is, and what we, the British people, can do to stop it, please consider purchasing a copy of my book. The link is below.
https://t.co/kpQBeancvN

[James Esses @JamesEsses]

If you want to summarise just how messed up the United Kingdom is in a single sentence:

The UK government believes that 11 year olds are too young to watch YouTube but old enough to block their puberty and render themselves infertile.

[Dominic Cummings @Dominic2306]

All pathological yookay systems working overtime, thanks to LAB-CON

[John McMullan @john_mcmullan]

@DadRogd @JournalistJill @FondOfBeetles @JurassicParkTho I think things are so bad that I would accept being mistakenly put to death by the state if ALL murderers we’re as well. We have CCTV and DNA now too.

[John McMullan @john_mcmullan]

@DadRogd @JournalistJill @FondOfBeetles @JurassicParkTho We need to accept that some innocent men will be murdered so that we can murder all the murdeous men.

[Clare Page : No Secret Lessons @NoSecretLessons]

If they wanted to protect children they’d raise the digital age of consent, get young children off smartphones altogether until child safe products and services are on offer and regulate tech companies better.

And that would be part of a wider push to protect kids from ideological, commercial and sexual exploitation altogether, both online and in schools.

Instead, they’ve driven teens onto VPNs and left parents unable to safeguard them as the kids have digital privacy from 13+.

But then what else would you expect from a regime that wants to legalise abortion up to birth, kill the elderly and infirm, encourage mothers to dump their 9 month old babies in childcare and their infants in breakfast clubs, lets pornographers and sex toy vendors teach RSE and lobby Parliament about it, politicise childhood by giving 16 year-olds the vote, import violent criminals by the boatload and ignore rape gang atrocities, protect cross sex identity fraud in the workplace, conduct puberty blocker trials on children and give them the label of ‘transexual’ according to gender laws?

Labour are just one giant red flag. 🚩

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Je vais partir du principe que tu es de bonne foi, parce que ton raisonnement est intuitif et que 90% des gens le partagent. Mais il repose sur trois erreurs factuelles, et ça vaut le coup de les regarder calmement.

Erreur 1 : la fortune d'Elon n'est pas un tas d'argent. C'est de la propriété d'usines, de fusées et de satellites. "Prendre la moitié de sa tune", concrètement, ça veut dire forcer la vente de la moitié de SpaceX et Tesla. L'argent ne sort pas d'un coffre, il sort des entreprises elles-mêmes, qui passent sous contrôle de fonds étrangers ou d'États. Tu ne redistribues pas du cash, tu démantèles un outil de production. C'est la différence entre récolter des pommes et découper le pommier.

Erreur 2 : "ça résout énormément de problèmes dans le monde". Cette expérience a déjà été tentée, en vrai. En 2021, le directeur du Programme Alimentaire Mondial de l'ONU a affirmé que 6 milliards de Musk pouvaient "résoudre la faim dans le monde". Réponse d'Elon : décrivez-moi exactement comment, comptabilité publique à l'appui, et je vends mes actions Tesla immédiatement. Le PAM a publié son plan. Verdict : ce n'était pas "résoudre la faim", c'était nourrir 42 millions de personnes pendant un an. Un an. Puis il faut re-payer, pour toujours. Le PAM avait d'ailleurs levé 8,4 milliards l'année précédente, et la faim était toujours là. Les ONG traitent les symptômes en boucle, jamais les causes, parce que leur financement dépend de l'existence du problème.

Erreur 3, la plus importante : tu cherches ce qui sort vraiment les gens de la pauvreté. Bonne nouvelle, on a la réponse, et elle est massive. En 1990, 36% de l'humanité vivait dans l'extrême pauvreté. Aujourd'hui, moins de 9%. Plus d'un milliard de personnes sorties de la misère en 30 ans. Par quoi ? Pas par la charité ni par l'aide internationale (plus de 1 000 milliards versés à l'Afrique en 60 ans pour un résultat à peu près nul). Par l'ouverture des marchés, l'industrialisation, le commerce. La Chine seule a sorti 800 millions de personnes de la pauvreté en abandonnant le collectivisme, pas en taxant ses entrepreneurs.

Donc fais le calcul complet. Option A : tu confisques 500 milliards, tu finances quelques années de programmes, l'argent est consommé, et tu as détruit la machine qui produisait les fusées, les voitures électriques et l'internet des zones rurales. Option B : tu laisses le meilleur allocateur de capital de sa génération réinvestir 100% de sa fortune dans des industries qui baissent les coûts pour tout le monde et emploient des centaines de milliers de personnes. L'option A soulage ta morale pendant 18 mois. L'option B sort des populations entières de la pauvreté pour toujours.

La pauvreté ne se redistribue pas. Elle se résout par la création. C'est contre-intuitif, c'est frustrant, mais c'est ce que disent 200 ans de données.

[Richard Hakeswill @fanofnicethings]

Village cricket will not survive the Boriswave. Played against a team of 11 freshies today who:

• Refused to give very obvious wickets (no neutral umpires in Div 9)
• Wouldn’t signal their boundaries (one side of the ground on a slope so unable to see the rope)
• Constantly, relentlessly, endlessly appealed for decisions that couldn’t possibly be out

This might all sound trivial but village cricket is built on trust; the trust that you will have to give your team mates out, the understanding that people will play hard but fair. That If the umpire can’t see something you assist him honestly. This is how the game has been played for 300 years, maybe longer, and now it’s going to be ruined by squealing, selfish man-children who don’t speak enough English to engage in banter, don’t play fairly and don’t stay behind to put even a tenner behind the bar.

[Kellie-Jay Keen @ThePosieParker]

The worst thing about those that got it so wrong about the Dundee girls is that they probably won’t think about why they got it wrong. They won’t examine their loathing of the working class, their “anti wacist” virtue signalling dishonest bullshit that meant they proudly stood against those girls with nothing to go on beside the video of a frightened young girl v immigrant adults.

They proved to everyone that they unquestioningly stand with perverts and menaces as long as they’re “foreign” or brown and against young white girls.

We all saw it.

I bet they’ll be standing against the working class girls when it comes to migrant hotels and the threat of physical and sexual assaults from migrant men.

[Jill Foster @JournalistJill]

@NadiaWhittomeMP Feels like this didn’t get through to you the first time so I will ask again: but why are men like this more important to you than my daughters, nieces, female friends?