every retail strategy breaks eventually. wall street buried the reason in a 1976 paper
it's called the realized/implied vol ratio - a single number that tells you which market state you're in before a trade
trending, mean-reverting, high-volatility: each demands a completely different strategy
running trend-following in a mean-reverting regime isn't bad luck - it's a math guarantee to lose
> above 1.2: trending regime - momentum strategies have edge
> below 0.8: mean-reverting regime - stat-arb activates
> 0.8-1.2: no position
that's the classifier quant desks run before any signal fires
fischer black published this in 1976. it sat in academic journals for decades while retail stared at candles
two sigma, citadel, renaissance all run some version of it. it predates most of their analysts
data is free on yahoo finance, python implementation is 15 lines
Bookmark this
you didn't have a bad strategy
you had a good one in the wrong regime, and nobody in your group ever told you regimes exist
@Jigsaw_Trading My clients are all looking at entries during open and monitoring through he day. I dont know retail always tries to make specific conditions for when trading should be executed.
@Banks@blknoiz06@Banks a few of different Twitter communities have a beef with TJR for a bunch of reasons, relating to "alleged" fraud. CT is not the first screen to take issue with him. The sentiment is bound to spread around.
@Jigsaw_Trading My biggest mistake when I first started was thinking I would be able to get where I want get to by just placing a trade and setting then R. Ive seen way better results just keeping an eye on things and making choices as price developed.
I think what is being said here are 2 sides of tje same coin. @probablechris is saying its marketed as a 50k account and then when you go love they essential pull back the curtain. @SithHaters youre also correct it is a 2k account. Both can be true. But having the discussion helps the majority of people who dont yet understand this.