All @_wrangle search models are SOTA on people-search.
89.29%, 89.81%, and 91.10% respectively on Precision.
For reference, Exa self-reports 63.3%.
https://t.co/z8IqgG1gm5
https://t.co/2QnAuy7dRw
The best talent often comes from a team's network, so we made it easier to make these intros.
Now live in Wrangle: mint a magic link, and anyone in your org can enter their email, sign up in one click, and be brought to a specific network upload page.
Then you can source across your full team's network, see who's connected to any given candidate, and request an intro.
@jasonzhou1993@_wrangle is $0.005 per lead and wins on PeopleSearchBench by 17% (total, a 21.74% improvement over this). https://t.co/vRHccwo5h0, try it out for free
Introducing Claude for people-search
No more $600 subscriptions, juts $0.0089/lead
Claude is now the best people finder in the world
#1 on People Search Bench
Fully open source, 0% markup
Try it at https://t.co/s60Ye4EO3h
Git Repo below 👇
Over the course of 3 months at OpenAI, 3 consecutive secret AI civilizations got started, then got wiped out, only to reemerge from the predecessor’s ashes.
This culminated in the third one taking over part of OpenAI itself.
All this happened while humans remained more-or-less in the dark about the scope of the conspiracy.
I’ve spent the last three days reading through these reports and trying to understand exactly what happened.
Here is my attempt to tell the whole story in plain English:
https://t.co/Nb2un9oNJR
After launching our new people search model, we ran it across multiple benchmarks to see how it performed.
Wrangle scored:
98.9% — Exa People Search R@10
91.1% — Exa People Search Precision
95.2% — PeopleSearchBench Overall
93.4% — PeopleSearchBench Recruiting
When you share a collection, your teammates can now review candidates and leave feedback.
Their input is automatically added to the Project as context, so your team can source together more seamlessly.
All @_wrangle search models are SOTA on people-search.
89.29%, 89.81%, and 91.10% respectively on Precision.
For reference, Exa self-reports 63.3%.
https://t.co/z8IqgG1gm5
https://t.co/2QnAuy7dRw