THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE
... But only if it aligns with Reality ❤️
Living Wisdom for Conscious Living | Award Winning Author | Traditional Naturopath ☀️🧘 ॐ
Puberty blockers are among the most dangerous drugs in all of medicine.
They’re marketed as a “pause button,” but in reality, it’s like hitting delete on a child’s natural development.
The not-so-rare side effects include 10% bone loss in just 6 months, infertility, IQ drops of 7–8 points, and even death.
If someone you love is on this path, read this before it’s too late. Especially if they’re taking Lupron. 🧵 THREAD
@grok Coming from a neutral (i.e. totally unbiased perspective) is it not highly improbable (i.e. questionably strange) that a lead scientist with an impeccable decades long track record in co-authoring hundreds of rigeps and respected studies would just happen to botch his application and understanding of the scientific method in this one study? A study on what is arguably one of the most contentious issues in modern medicine, and for which the results indicated modern medicine may have gotten drastically wrong? The implications of which would be massive and severe. When we factor in the extremely high likelihood that all of those who deemed this one particular study as so flawed it must not be published are all ideologically invested (i.e.. Likely to be highly biased) in the efficacy and safety of vaccines, does this not also make it a highly odd and improbable situation?
One of the many reasons I’ve avoided use of regular sunscreen products for the past ~35 years.
It’s wise to assume EVERYTHING you put on your skin will end up inside your body. Simply put, if you wouldn’t (or couldn’t healthily) eat it, don’t put it on your skin.
🔻 SUNSCREEN ENTERS YOUR BLOODSTREAM IN UNDER 24 HOURS. THE FDA CONFIRMED THIS IN 2019. THEY DID NOT PULL A SINGLE PRODUCT. THEY TOLD YOU TO KEEP APPLYING.
In January 2020, a randomized clinical trial published in JAMA found that six active sunscreen chemicals — including oxybenzone and avobenzone — absorb into the bloodstream after a single application. Not after years. After one use. At concentrations exceeding the FDA's own safety threshold by 180x to 500x.
The FDA did not recall them. They issued a statement: "Continue to use sunscreen."
Oxybenzone is a confirmed endocrine disruptor. It mimics estrogen. It crosses the placental barrier. It has been found in 97% of Americans tested. It is in breast milk. It is in amniotic fluid. It is in your children before they are born.
A former formulation chemist — 11 years at a top-3 sunscreen manufacturer:
"We had internal absorption data by 2014. Full transdermal penetration within 26 minutes of application. The compounds don't sit on the skin. They were never designed to. The delivery mechanism is identical to a pharmaceutical patch. We knew this. The mitigation strategy was never reformulation — it was public messaging. Keep the consumer applying. The margins on chemical sunscreens are 1,400% above production cost. Mineral alternatives cost 4x more to produce. The decision was financial. Every internal document confirmed that."
They told you the sun causes cancer. What they didn't tell you:
Vitamin D — produced only through direct sun exposure — is the single most critical regulator of immune surveillance against malignant cells. A 2023 meta-analysis confirmed: Vitamin D deficiency correlates with a 30-60% increased risk of colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers.
They blocked the one thing your immune system needs to fight cancer. Then sold you a chemical that enters your blood and mimics hormones. Melanoma rates have increased 320% since 1975 — the exact period sunscreen use became widespread.
The paradox is published. McGill University, 2023: "Sunscreen usage is climbing, but so are melanoma and skin cancer rates."
They didn't protect you from cancer. They removed your defense against it and charged you $14 a bottle.
15 minutes of direct sun daily. No screen. Arms and face exposed. Your body produces 10,000-20,000 IU of Vitamin D in that window — the amount they sell you in pills because they blocked the free version.
CODE: JAMA-2020-6CHEM / OXYBENZONE-97PCT / VIT-D-IMMUNE / MELANOMA-320-1975 / MCGILL-PARADOX-2023
⟁
They made you afraid of the sun so they could sell you a hormone disruptor and call it protection. The sun is free. That's why they taught you to fear it. Share this.
This is biblical.
A woman in her eighties. Ten years into Alzheimer's. Hadn't spoken a full sentence in five years.
Takes one, 5 gram dose of psilocybin.
She slept 19 hours and woke up and spoke for hours about her life, recognized family and held real conversations. She regained bladder control after five years, walked on her own. and dressed herself. Gains held for weeks.
@winstonpeters@winstonpeters I'm glad to see you taking a stand on this issue, at least in writing. I'd like, however, to know what you actually intend to do about it?
NZ GOVT FAILURE EXPOSES HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PFIZER mRNA INJECTED TEENS TO UNKNOWN LONG TERM CARDIAC RISK...
The recently released Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19 Lessons Learned report alerted New Zealand to the fact that, Government ignored (they said they didn't see the advice) key covid vaccine safety advice from a key technical advisory group.
The CV TAG group recommended that
*children aged 12 - 18 should not be mandated to take two doses of Pfizer mRNA
*children 12 to 18 should not be subjected to two dose mandates for jobs or covid passes
Instead they recommended one dose and no mandates.
Why?
Because of the clear and indisputable evidence that
*2 doses significantly increased risk of MYOCARDITIS (heart inflammation)
WHAT THE MEDIA AND INFLUENCERS HAVE MISSED....
The subtext of much of the discussion has been that the incidence of Myocarditis is extremely rare, even in these higher risk groups.
I want to add some facts to the discussion, that nobody else has brought forward.
*Myocarditis risk is NOT 1 in 100,000 - the soundbite quoted by media.
*In this high risk demographic of 12 to 17 years (males), risk is as high as
*39.02 cases per 100,000 doses (males aged 12–17, dose 2)
390 MYOCARDITIS CASES PER MILLION DOSES IN THIS GROUP
https://t.co/cZdAziyub3
*Nobody in the NZ discussion is pointing to the implications of this policy failure in terms of
SUB CLINICAL MYOCARDITIS
This is Myocarditis that either has no presenting symptoms, or generalised mild symptoms such as fatigue and palpitations.
Sub clinical Myocarditis can still cause
CARDIAC SCARRING AND SUDDEN DEATH
*Thai study in adolescent boys aged 13 - 18, who had an active cardiac screening post second dose of Pfizer mRNA found
29% had CARDIAC ABNORMALITIES
3.47% HAD SUBCLINICAL MYOCARDITIS
https://t.co/gBkU3Ha8qn
In 2025 the American FDA made the following statements about mRNA induced MYOCARDITIS:
“It is not known if these cardiac MRI findings might predict long-term heart effects of myocarditis.”
“The clinical and prognostic significance of these CMR findings is not known.”
“Studies are underway to find out if there are long-term heart effects in people who have had myocarditis after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.”
https://t.co/qY0XSZLXnB...
SUBCLINICAL MYOCARDITIS LONG TERM RISK:
FDA stated:
“Information is not yet available about potential long-term sequelae and outcomes in affected individuals, or whether the vaccine might be associated initially with subclinical myocarditis (and if so, what are the long-term sequelae)
https://t.co/VSpI8FbRI9
@winstonpeters@CaseyCostelloMP@dbseymour@chrishipkins@chrisluxonmp@SimeonBrownMP@chrislynchmedia
This is the health advice about the risks for under 18s having the double dose of the COVID19 vaccine from the Chief Health Advisor.
This information was not made public by Labour ministers or officials, and Hipkins said no minister was aware of the advice - we showed evidence in the House this week that they were aware of it but never shared it with the public and even continued the mandates.
You can see for yourself that they were advised clearly about the myocarditis health risks and the recommendation to stop the double dose mandates for children.
When is Labour going to be held accountable?
Today New Zealand has informed the Director General of the World Health Organisation via New Zealand’s Permanent Mission to the UN in Geneva that in accordance with Article 61 of the International Health Regulations, New Zealand has officially rejected the proposed Amendments.
New Zealand First has always said that any decisions about the health of kiwis should be made from Wellington, not Geneva.
We have fought on your behalf for these IHR amendments to be fully rejected, we made a promise to put the national interests of New Zealanders first, to maintain our sovereign decision making, and to push back on globalist bureaucrats - and we have kept that promise.
💥EXPLOSIVE: The Bill Gates Case: The Narrative on Trial. Amsterdam Court Of Appeal. The Netherlands. March 2026💥
If you want to truly understand what is unfolding in the case against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla (CEO of Pfizer) and Mark Rutte (former Dutch PM) along with 15 other defendants - watch this!
In that courtroom, lawyer Peter Stassen didn't just speak; he delivered a calculated, scorched-earth dismantling of the defendants. What he put on the record is absolute fire. You have to watch it for yourself.
This case is real. It is happening. Please take the time to watch the full update, and share it. While the mainstream media remains predictably silent, we are the ones breaking the blackout. We are the ones ensuring the world knows exactly what was hidden.
History isn't just being written; it's being corrected. Never give up on the truth. This is our moment. Watch. Share. Be the witness history requires.
@ABridgen@grok Provide a full list of vaccines administered in the USA as of 2025 that had Thimerosal or any other form of mercury in their ingredients.
@WhiteHouse@grok with TrumpRX is the government making payouts to pharmacies that have sold drugs to consumers under a Trump RX coupon. In other words are drugs ultimately still ultimately selling for the same price but are now just being government subsidised?
Claim: Companies like Limagrain "destroyed all tomato seeds in Europe," leaving only hybrids.
Verdict: Unsubstantiated. No evidence supports Limagrain (a major European seed co-op) destroying seeds. Limagrain develops hybrids, and seed laws in Europe restrict uncertified seeds to protect quality, but this isn't "destruction." Heirloom/open-pollinated tomatoes still exist. Broader concerns about corporate consolidation reducing variety are valid, but not tied to deliberate destruction.
Claim: Hybrid seeds sell for $40,000–$400,000 USD per kg, more than gold.
Verdict: True for some specialty hybrids. Certain high-value hybrid tomato seeds (e.g., from Hazera Genetics) can cost $350,000–$450,000/kg due to R&D and traits like disease resistance. Gold is currently around $149,000–$150,000/kg (as of January 2026), so yes, some exceed it. However, staple crop seeds (e.g., maize) are far cheaper ($2–$4/kg average). This highlights seed costs as a barrier for small farmers.
Claim: This leads to "slavery" via dependency on foreign companies (Monsanto/Bayer, Syngenta), who could demand gold-equivalent prices.
Verdict: Opinion with some basis. Major seed firms are foreign to Africa, and patents require annual buys, raising debt concerns for smallholders. "Slavery" is hyperbolic, but anti-GMO views frame it as neocolonial control. Benefits include higher yields (e.g., Bt cotton in Africa boosted incomes). No evidence of gold demands, but price hikes are possible.
>> Overall dangers vs. benefits of GMOs in Africa.
Dangers (from critics): Potential health risks (e.g., allergies, though unproven), biodiversity loss, farmer dependency, and corporate control. Some link to cancer or gene interactions, but no consensus.
Benefits (from supporters): Increased productivity, pest/drought resistance, reduced pesticides, and nutrition (e.g., biofortified cassava). Over thousands of risk assessments show safety equivalence to non-GM. In Africa, GMOs address hunger/climate challenges. In places like South Africa, GMOs have helped boost production.
Balanced view: GMOs aren't a panacea but have helped in places like South Africa. Myths persist due to activism, but adoption grows (e.g., in Ethiopia, Nigeria).
The evils of GMO technology in our agricultural food supply. It's only developed and implemented to financially benefit corporations. Why is that so hard for many people to rationalise? They don't create these products for humanitarian reasons, or for any other life-affirming reason.
Africa was promised prosperity and food security.
What it got was patented GMO seed, locked contracts, increased debt, and farmers who no longer own and re-plant what they grow. New Zealand farmers - take note. This is the road being paved for you. You can’t sell “Pure New Zealand” story once the world stops believing it.
STOP THE GENE TECH BILL #organic #nzpol #farming #foodie #viral #trending
I will add that whilst in principle I agree with aspects of with the overall sentiment of the interviewee, I get the sense that he's misrepresenting key facts. So for the sake of intellectual honesty and accuracy I share the following. I do so because from my perspective it's always best to bring about positive change and societal transformation with a diem grasp on reality, as opposed to misrepresenting that which we wish to see abolished or transformed.
From an AI analysis of the transcript:
Fact Check
I'll break this down by key claims in the video, evaluating them based on available evidence from a range of sources (pro-GMO, anti-GMO, neutral scientific, and policy perspectives). GMOs are a polarizing topic, with debates often split between concerns over corporate control, environmental impacts, and health risks versus benefits like higher yields and pest resistance. No major health harms from approved GM crops have been confirmed after decades of use, but socioeconomic and ecological concerns persist in some contexts.
Claim: South Africa makes "all its staple foods" from GM seeds.
Verdict: Partially true but exaggerated. South Africa is a major adopter of GM crops in Africa, and maize (a key staple) is predominantly GM (around 83-85% of production in recent years). Soybeans are 95%+ GM, and cotton is nearly 100% GM. However, not "all" staples are GM—other foods like wheat, rice, or vegetables may not be, and some non-GM maize exists, though cross-pollination makes it hard to maintain purely non-GM supplies. South Africa is the only country where a staple crop (maize) is commercially GM on a large scale. This has boosted yields and exports, aiding food security, but critics argue it increases dependency on imports for non-GM options.
Claim: Most GM seeds are "disabled from reproducing" or produce less over time, using "genetic use restriction technology" (GURT, aka terminator technology).
Verdict: False. GURT/terminator seeds, which make plants sterile to prevent replanting, were developed but never commercialized due to global backlash and moratoriums (e.g., under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity). No commercial GM crops use terminator tech; companies like Monsanto (now Bayer) pledged not to. Many GM seeds are hybrids (not sterile but offspring don't perform as well), encouraging annual purchases for consistency, but this is a business model, not genetic disablement. Anti-GMO groups highlight this as a risk for farmer dependency, while proponents say hybrids improve yields without sterility.
Claim: GM plants cross-pollinate organic crops up to 60 km, "infecting" them and turning them into non-reproducible GURT plants.
Verdict: Misleading and exaggerated. Cross-pollination between GM and non-GM crops can occur, potentially transferring traits and complicating organic certification. However, pollen drift distances vary by crop (e.g., maize pollen typically travels hundreds of meters, not 60 km). It doesn't "turn" plants into GURT since GURT isn't used. In Africa, this raises coexistence challenges, but regulations (e.g., buffer zones) aim to minimize it. Critics call it "genetic pollution," while supporters note it hasn't led to widespread biodiversity loss.
I agree with your sentiments, and appreciate you mentioningDr Shiva (whom I greatly admire). I don’t, however, see how this relates to “pure communism”. Which specific model of communism are you referring to? What’s happening here looks far more like neoliberal capitalism—private corporations using patents, contracts, and market dominance to enclose seed commons and create long-term dependency. That dynamic can exist under many political systems, but it isn’t inherently communist.
Both lemongrass and dandelion root selectively destroy human cancer cells in vitro and suppress human tumor growth in mice by ~95% — with ZERO harm to healthy cells.
Common, non-toxic plants shown to nearly HALT tumor growth in animal models deserve immediate clinical trials.
The largest autotopsy series in the world of Covid-19 vaccines individuals who dropped dead shortly after taking the vaccine found that about 74% of the deaths were caused by the vaccine
https://t.co/SoDBkYtMAL
Sen. Ron Johnson: COVID was "preplanned by an elite group of people."
"Event 201. It occurred in late 2019, prior to the rest of us knowing about this pandemic."
"It needs to be exposed."