@Ditch43 @HazelAppleyard_ I believe the idea is to model the distress from someone refusing to go along with the delusion, so we can witness that distress and decide to acquiesce to the delusion because of it.
@StarsStripesUS @MylesNelsonLLC @TEMPLERTV Especially after he just made what could be two signaling motions - hat and cheek - then raises his phone to film what happens next.
@Aja1764741Aja@irenebritusa@marymyeon1 It’s not that we don’t see it.
We do.
What we don’t agree on is that it should be women’s problem to solve. It’s not.
Trans-identifying males don’t belong in women’s single sex spaces - prisons, toilets, medical exams, rape counseling, CR’s, sports, etc.
@seanstocks@angijones@m_scottie57 What exactly has to be spelled out to men?
“Changing Rooms” wouldn’t be clear enough?
It has to say “Men’s Changing Rooms?” before they know what it is?
The issue is there’s no equivalent “Women’s Changing Rooms.”
@JerryLorow@MuellerSheWrote I think it’s badly worded.
I doubt the food bank “had” ICE arrest the father, in the sense that they orchestrated it.
But increasingly we do hear “had” being used in this manner, to mean “I experienced” or “I suffered” something happening.
Ex: “I had my car stolen.”
@Tony_Gehring@detransaqua The members of the public encountering him in his bus driver uniform and role wouldn’t have known he wanted to be addressed as a woman, though.
How could they?
They’d see a man and just naturally address him as Sir, or maybe something like son, or lad if they’re older.
@ToothyMaestra@mickbrick54@TheParty1sOver@ThePosieParker They don’t want to be reminded of reality, or forced to live in the real world with the rest of us.
They want to be able to claim “harassment” when others express protected views.
Hence their “be kind” demand, which really means “Go along with the lies to preserve my delusion”
@mickbrick54@TheParty1sOver@ThePosieParker Exactly. The line between free speech and expression of protected beliefs on the one hand, and “harassment” on the other, must be legally determined.
Otherwise the SC ruling is meaningless if people can still crybully women into silence with claims of “harassment.”
@helen_smitheman @ThePosieParker And, it seems a daughter who gets a GRC and starts living as a man, STILL doesn’t qualify as a son in terms of primogeniture.
Even with GRC’s, the man always remains a man and the woman always remains a woman.
Proving even more that they know biological sex cannot be changed.