@sorry_sarrr Actually it’s reverse Divya Bhaskar should raise questions on hospital for not providing 24*7 doctors in ICU
On Contrary they Praise it
If patient had died who would be responsible
Judiciary in last few days
> Allahabad High Court stayed 91% reservation in 4 UP medical colleges
> MP High court struck down the 27% OBC quota in MP
> Karnataka high court struck down 56% Reservation
> Chhattisgarh High Court Cancels 84% Reservation
> Supreme Court rules that anyone converting to another religion cannot claim Reservation.
Now you know why some people are after judiciary!
UP पुलिस भर्ती के रिजल्ट:
कुल सीट: 32679
ST: 1%
SC: 22%
OBC: 55%
UR: 20%
यानी 80% सीट पर SC/ST/OBC सिलेक्ट हुए हैं, जबकि आरक्षण 50% ही है।
अब सवाल ये कि जब ओपन सीट में भी आधे से ज़्यादा सीट OBC ले जाते हैं, तो फिर इनको आरक्षण क्यों बढ़वाना है?
उल्टा अब आरक्षण कम होना चाहिए!
Why is the identity of the Omani co pilot still not public?
Captain Smit Machchhar did not just help save the passengers, he protected India’s name too by showing extraordinary courage even after being stabbed.
My analysis is that this incident may have implications beyond one flight, especially for UAE Israel ties, I2U2 and the larger IMEC architecture.
PM Modi and President Murmu have praised him. The bigger questions now are simple: Who was the attacker, what was his motive, and was he acting alone?
🚨 SHOCKING ALLEGATION FROM HARDOI, UP
Officer: “Tumhari jaati kya hai?”
Farmer: “Main Pandey hoon, aur woh Pasi hai.”
Officer: “Chalo, ise SC/ST wala lagaao!”
A Revenue Department officer is allegedly accused of threatening a farmer with the SC/ST Act during a land measurement dispute in Hardoi.
"Brahmin Savarna who killed Sahil."
- Says this Ambedkarite
In this incidence, no brahmin was involved.
& It was a case of suicide.
But still he blames brahmin
That's the amount of hate & fake propaganda they spread.
PS. Same group is demanding reservation in private sector.
जांच पूरी होने से पहले SCST एक्ट में जेल भेजा जाए वह सही है।
जांच पूरी होने से पहले एक IIT प्रोफ़ेसर को हत्यारा बताना उसकी छवि खराब करना,वह ठीक है।
जांच पूरी होने से पहले प्रोफेसर का इस्तीफा ले लो सही है।
जांच पूरी होने से पहले प्रोफेसर के लिए फांसी की मांग करो वह भी सही है,पर जैसे ही सीसीटीवी वीडियो रिलीज की गई,इन्हें समस्या हो गई।
मानसिक बीमार हो या देश में आग लगवाना चाहते हो?
मंशा क्या है?
As per data presented in Rajyasabha (by GOI):
Suicide rate (2019-2023)-
SC=13.3% (Population 16.6%)
ST=4% (Population 8%)
OBC=34.7% (Population 44-45%)
GC=48% (population 31%)
Please make "GC protection act" to save them from "caste-discrimination" in academic institutions 🙏
माननीय @nsitharaman जी
आज फ्लाइट बुकिंग के लिए जब हमने अपने एजेंट को कॉल किया तो उन्होंने कहा की UPI पर जो चार्ज मर्चेंट्स को लगेगा वो हम क्लाइंट से ही वसूल करेंगे, हम क्यों भुगते,
हम बिल में उतना एक्स्ट्रा जोड़कर ही क्लाइंट को देंगे
यानी यह भुगतान इनडायरेक्टली क्लाइंट की जेब से ही जाएगा,
अत: आपसे निवेदन है की इस विषय पर एक बार पुनःविचार करे।
cc @AmitShah@narendramodi
I think MDR on UPI was probably inevitable at some point, especially given how widespread UPI adoption has become. It could also lead to more competition, instead of just three apps accounting for more than 95% of the market.
That being said, there are some use cases, like investing and broking, where the proposed MDR structure doesn’t really make sense.
The problem with broking is that there is no guarantee that money transferred to a broker will actually result in a transaction.
As brokers, we can’t force a customer to trade after transferring money. And if we can’t pass the UPI charge on to the customer, there is essentially no limit to the cost a customer can impose on a broker without generating any revenue.
Just as an example, 10,000 customers could each make 50 UPI transfers of ₹2 lakh in a month without executing a single trade. At the proposed MDR, this could potentially cost the broker around ₹2 crore, without generating any business.
What makes this even more challenging is quarterly settlement (QS). This is a SEBI regulation that requires brokers to send unused funds back to clients every month or quarter.
Most customers then transfer these funds back to their broking accounts, with more than half of these transfers happening through UPI. So regulation essentially forces this movement of money every month or quarter, and the broker could end up bearing the cost when the money comes back, without any incremental benefit or revenue.
By the way, we currently don’t charge brokerage on equity delivery trades because the economics allow us to offer them for free. But if every UPI transfer starts carrying an additional cost, irrespective of whether the customer actually trades, I don’t see how we can absorb this indefinitely.
I think having an MDR is okay. It still doesn’t solve the problem of customers transferring money without transacting, but something like 0.02% with a cap of ₹5 or ₹10 per transaction seems much more reasonable for broking, instead of a cap as high as ₹300.