Jan-Phillipp Küsters

Bodensee - Architekt

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@askmadness @klammerdackel Ist da auch schon das Personal zur Bedienung mit eingerechnet? Eventuelle Reparaturen? Service? Ersatzteile? Nicht dass ich denke, dass es sich nicht refinanzieren kann. Aber Anschaffungspreis durch einnahmen ist meist zu einfach…

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@Twafu_OwO @iseenowmyprob @J0ui @SariArhoHavren Thx ☺️

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@BSLiberal @IemistraI Komisch, dass das was sie sagen meiner Erfahrung nach schlicht BS ist. Ich habe im direkten Umfeld Personen mit Psychischen Vorbelastungen. Die aber, nach Unterstützung, die absoluten Leistungsträger ihrer Abteilung sind. Vielleicht sind sie nur nicht gut in ihrem Job?

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@Trockie_TM @Mrs_Bonnie1969 Fachbetrieb Angebot für Reparatur erstellen lassen. Dass ist dann der Schaden.

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@Brand_Anuj @NasheCeezet_zw Every leader who can‘t handle constructive criticism shouldn’t be a leader.

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@WolfiMagic @lala_larou

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@Egl3Rion @lala_larou

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@actromantic @lala_larou @Oh_Fallada

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@Metalfy @lala_larou @Oh_Fallada

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@Parkettpolitur @lala_larou @Oh_Fallada

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@Leseerlaubnis einen Anreiz haben Energie zu sparen. 2/

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@Leseerlaubnis Ich bin grundsätzlich dafür, Vermietern Anreize zu setzen zu modernisieren. Aber der Mieter hat ja auch die Möglichkeit, die Wohnung auf 26grad hochzuheizen. Und die Kosten dafür auf den Vermieter zu übertragen fände ich auch wenig sinnvoll. Denn der Mieter muss ja auch 1/

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@libertas_HH 7% durchschnittlich ist nicht konservativ.

[MrMoregame @MrMoregame]

Können wir BITTE BITTE eine riesen Petition aufmachen, dass er auf den Mond diesen Aufkleber kleben soll?

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@Andreas44741791 @saki_statements Exakt. Kaputt heist in der Regel unter 80%, nicht 0% Ladekapazität.

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@RandomUzza @Andreas44741791 @saki_statements Okay, so count only 50%. Still 315.000km…

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@Schiya346 @damensitz @12benjamin21 Really? Im Zweifel dauert einen neuen zu erstellen 5 Minuten, maximal.

[Dr. Paula Piechotta MdB - auch auf Bluesky @PaulaPiechotta]

Statt das gesamte Ministerium durch teure Beraterverträge zu ersetzen wäre es vielleicht leichter & billiger, einfach die Ministerin auszuwechseln. Nur so als Vorschlag. https://t.co/b3RxJNaxJE

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@Twafu_OwO @iseenowmyprob @J0ui @SariArhoHavren

[Jan-Phillipp Küsters @jp3112]

@iseenowmyprob @J0ui @SariArhoHavren https://t.co/OR6RVxBPxV

[ℰ𝓋𝑜𝓁𝓊𝓉𝒾𝒶 ℛ𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓊𝓃𝒾𝒾 @EvolutiaR]

100,000 American troops in Europe = a free ride for Europeans?

Let's check the facts.

🔹 American military bases are not free
Germany, Italy, Spain, and Romania pay for the infrastructure, land, utilities, and civilian personnel of US bases. Germany alone contributes over $1 billion annually to support the American military presence on its soil.

🔹 Europe is the largest customer of the American defense industry
F-35s, Patriot missiles, HIMARS, Apaches — all purchased by Europeans with real money. Every security alarm in Europe translates into contracts for Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Boeing.

🔹 American bases in Europe don't only protect Europe
Ramstein in Germany coordinates operations across Africa and the Middle East. Sigonella in Italy covers the Mediterranean and North Africa. Romania secures the eastern flank and the Black Sea. These are global American strategic assets — not neighborhood security for Europeans.

🔹 Command is American, not European
NATO is always led by an American Supreme Commander (SACEUR). Europe contributes troops, bases, and money — but America holds the controls. Those who control the structure are not the ones getting a free ride.

🔹 The nuclear umbrella is not altruism
American nuclear deterrence in Europe keeps the dollar as the world's reserve currency, keeps European markets open to US corporations, and legitimizes American hegemony against Russia and China.
But what would actually happen if America withdrew its troops from Europe?

🔹 For America — immediate strategic losses
Without bases in Europe, American response time to any crisis in Europe, Africa, or the Middle East grows from hours to days. Ramstein, Sigonella, and Incirlik cannot be replaced by aircraft carriers. Infrastructure built over decades disappears overnight.

🔹 The American defense industry loses its biggest customer
A Europe without the US umbrella will build its own defense industry — and fast. Airbus Military, KNDS, Leonardo, and Rheinmetall will take the contracts that Lockheed and Raytheon currently win. Billions of dollars shift from America to Europe.

🔹 The dollar weakens
Dollar hegemony is partly sustained by American global military credibility. A withdrawal from Europe signals to the world that America no longer guarantees the postwar order. Alternatives — the euro, the yuan — become more attractive as global reserve options.

🔹 Russia wins without firing a single shot
Not necessarily through immediate invasion — but through political influence, energy pressure, and the gradual destabilization of countries on the eastern frontier. The Baltic states, Poland, and Romania enter a security grey zone that no one can guarantee quickly.

🔹 China watches and draws conclusions about Taiwan
A precedent of withdrawal from Europe sends a direct signal to Beijing: American commitments are negotiable. The cost of deterrence in the Pacific rises exponentially.

Withdrawal is not isolationism. It is strategic abdication.
America would not be leaving Europe because it no longer has interests there.
It would be leaving while ignoring that those very interests are what make it a superpower.

The "free ride" narrative doesn't describe Europe.
It describes exactly what America has in Europe.