Fantastic long term data for HDR boost. Very interesting to see lower side effect profile for TRUS based over CT based planning. More confidence in contouring or greater certainty in needle positioning at time of treatment? @agomeziturriaga@KamravaMD
¡Otro gran trabajo en #ESTRO2026! Compartimos los resultados a largo plazo de la braquiterapia HDR boost en cáncer de próstata (TC based vs TRUS). Datos robustos con más de 10 años de seguimiento medio que avalan un excelente control y supervivencia de los pacientes.
Huge thank you to all collaborators, participating institutions, and international brachytherapy societies who helped distribute and support the survey.
Publication available here:
https://t.co/9KTxGbrlG7
#Brachytherapy#RadiationOncology#MedicalPhysics#RadOnc
This type of work is helping inform the development of larger international collaborative initiatives under ENCOMPASS, focused on outcomes, workflows, imaging, dosimetry, and quality assurance in prostate brachytherapy.
@PBlanchardMD@piet_ost@CTuscanoMD@CedricPetersRT While not great it might be the best tool that we have? I’m not aware of any better alternatives. We as a community are now starting to use it heavily in the reirradiation setting also (in general not just in prostate)…
@cristian_udo@ndesai2005@DrAndrewLoblaw Absolutely, apologies if previous posts have come across as rude. No mean feat to follow these patients for 10 years.
For me, shows lack of long term HDR brachy data in multi-institutional setting. We need to follow your lead and do better!
Congratulations @cristian_udo and co-authors on putting this together.
Hard to take too much away given the differences in how toxicity was collected amongst SBRT studies and only 1 brachytherapy trial included from single site.
We need more data before making conclusions