ImWhoIm ∞

Bagian the matrix, is @jrdsty and was @tupaiorange
(khusus bahasa) mz-ngab

[ImWhoIm ∞ @jrdstyzx]

Decentralized Developmentalism
Think East Asian state capacity, Hayekian distributed knowledge, Nadiem-style institutional feedback, Thatcherite market discipline,& liberal-democratic error correction—all organized around 1 principle: Centralize constraints, Decentralize search.

[ImWhoIm ∞ @jrdstyzx]

Adaptive Government Learning System (AGLS)

The SuperApp is only 1 interface.
What I’m actually building is a generalized government architecture based on the feedback-loop model pioneered by Nadiem, scaled across the entire government + GovtGuard and a National Merit System.

[ImWhoIm ∞ @jrdstyzx]

That distinction matters:

AI can discover new solutions, patterns, or configurations within existing theoretical frameworks without necessarily generating a fundamentally new framework or representation of its own.

[ImWhoIm ∞ @jrdstyzx]

Evolution itself is a benchmark for design perfection—not because every evolutionary outcome is perfect, but because it tests biological designs against the full complexity of reality: a dynamic environment governed by thermodynamic constraints, uncertainty, and constant change.

[François Chollet @fchollet]

Evolution doesn't benchmaxx. It optimizes for generality and robustness, because overspecialization makes a species fragile when the environment inevitably shifts.

[ImWhoIm ∞ @jrdstyzx]

This is a genuinely new productive theoretical generator, not merely a novel solution derived within an existing framework.

[ImWhoIm ∞ @jrdstyzx]

@Aswicahyono oh ternyata the next kambing hitam inkompetensi pemerintah Prabowo adalah geng oslo, buat nutupin fakta Pemerintah terus menerus ngegas pajakin rakyat ya?

[ImWhoIm ∞ @jrdstyzx]

@Aswicahyono Kambing hitam inkompetensi pemerintah: asing barat Soros, asing Singapura/Malaysia, oligarki chindo pesaing oligarki Prabowo, kelompok Islam konservatif ekstrim, apakah bakal bertambah lagi listnya?

[Neil Hudson @NeilHudsonexp]

Popper and Bartley’s asymmetry between creation and criticism survives intact in an Everettian multiverse. Deductive logic can transmit falsity backwards through a conjecture’s consequences, but it cannot transmit truth backwards to justify its premises or manufacture new explanatory premises.The multiverse may evolve deterministically while containing different successors of a scientist who encounter different problems, reject different conjectures and create different explanations. Their knowledge histories are observer-relative, but the logical relations governing criticism and the objective truth or falsity of fully specified propositions are not.Knowledge creation is therefore neither a stochastic selection of one future from many nor a deduction from existing knowledge. It is a physical process in which new explanatory content is instantiated, criticised and sometimes improved.

[Charles Wang @charleswangb]

Incompleteness is the fuel for creativity.
There is no final knowledge.

Gödel: no system closes over itself.
Turing: no program decides every program.
Nash: everyone’s best reply is already played. No one moves.
Closure, reached.
But only inside a fixed game.
Schumpeter: the game does not stay fixed.
Deacon: what is absent is what drives.

Defensibility is Nash for a firm:
a position no rival has reason to attack.
Exaggerate it to final knowledge, to permanent moat,
and it claims the game is closed.
It will end as all totalitarianism ends:
burst to dust.

[ImWhoIm ∞ @jrdstyzx]

In other words,

Intelligence enables us to recognize and transfer relationships;

Generativity measures how deeply we can discover their underlying generators and how broadly we can expand the space of what becomes derivable.

[ImWhoIm ∞ @jrdstyzx]

I think Spearman identified a fundamental mechanism of intelligence:

(((the ability to recognize relationships and transfer them to unfamiliar contexts. (analogical thinking) .)))

But I would extend this further.

[Scott Barry Kaufman ⛵ @sbkaufman]

The psychologist Charles Spearman said this already a century ago. He defined General Intelligence (the g factor) as the “eduction of relations and correlates,” which means seeing how two things relate and applying that relation to something new. That’s analogical thinking.

[ImWhoIm ∞ @jrdstyzx]

-Representational Plasticity (Rp):

How far can we transform or invent representations to make previously inaccessible relationships and possibilities derivable?

[François Chollet @fchollet]

Co-sign. The only future that is worth building is one in which AI remains a tool in human hands, used to elevate the human condition.

[kache @yacineMTB]

It's more likely that everyone is wrong rather than everyone is right