Olivia
Online
Joel Smernoff 🇺🇸🥋
@jsmernoff
CEO @goBlackUmbrella, papa to 2 munchkins, kitesurfer, urban survival, ex-car racer, and BJJ blue belt.
Greenwich, CT
Joined September 2007
74 Following
750 Followers
6.6K Posts
I love this country! Happy Independence Day!
⚡️We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
- In Congress, July 4, 1776
President Trump made $1 billion on crypto deals while his fans lost a fortune https://t.co/hh1rHQ7K2z
⚡️The BIS is pointing at the fracture that the AI hype machine refuses to stare at.
AI can massively expand productive capacity while simultaneously destroying the income channel that justifies that capacity.
That is the contradiction.
A normal productivity boom makes workers more productive, wages rise enough to support demand, businesses invest because consumers can buy the output, and the system keeps cycling.
AI threatens a different loop.
Capital buys machines.
Machines replace labor.
Labor share falls.
Household purchasing power weakens.
Consumption demand slows.
Firms see less future revenue from the goods and services AI can produce.
Investment eventually stalls because the customer base has been hollowed out.
That is the demand bottleneck.
The most important phrase in the excerpt is “automation increasingly diverts income from labour, which is spent on goods and services, into further AI investment.”
That is exactly the machine now forming. Workers spend income. Capital compounds income. If more of national income flows to capital owners, hyperscalers, platform firms, data-center owners, chip monopolies, software margins, and asset holders, the economy gets more productive while becoming less broadly consumptive.
That is how abundance can become deflationary stagnation instead of shared prosperity.
The AI optimists are right that the technology can explode output. The missing question is: who gets the money to buy the output?
If AI replaces labor income faster than new income channels appear, the system enters a demand crisis. The machines can produce more. The public can afford less. Firms then automate more to protect margins, which weakens labor income further. That is the doom loop.
This is why the labor-share data matters. Workers already receive the smallest share of income on record. AI arrives into that structure and gives capital an even cleaner way to produce without labor. So unless ownership broadens or redistribution changes, AI accelerates the existing transfer from workers to owners.
The endgame is not “AI has no demand.”
The endgame is demand becoming controlled by capital and the state rather than by broad household income.
Hyperscalers will demand AI.
Governments will demand AI.
Militaries will demand AI.
Large enterprises will demand AI.
Surveillance systems will demand AI.
Financial markets will demand AI.
The average worker may lose enough income that consumer demand becomes weaker, more debt-dependent, more subsidized, and more politically unstable.
That creates a split economy: machine abundance at the top, purchasing-power scarcity below.
That is the real danger.
AI does not automatically create a Star Trek economy. It can also create a neo-feudal productivity regime where owners command machine labor, workers lose bargaining power, and consumption gets propped up by debt, transfers, gambling, subsidies, or cheap synthetic entertainment.
This is why universal basic income keeps reappearing in the background of every serious AI discussion. Not because politicians suddenly became generous. Because if labor income collapses, demand has to be reinserted somehow. The machine still needs buyers, legitimacy, and social calm.
AI breaks capitalism if the ownership layer captures the productivity gain and the consumer layer loses the income needed to absorb the output.
The system has four exits.
One: workers become owners.
Two: the state redistributes machine surplus.
Three: AI creates enough new high-value human work to preserve labor demand.
Four: society accepts a smaller owner class, a weaker labor class, and a politically managed consumption floor.
The fourth path is the default unless something forces a different distribution.
That is the blade. AI may solve production and expose demand as the true constraint. The economy’s deepest problem becomes less “can we make enough?” and more “who still has a claim on the output?”
JUST IN: For the first time in modern history, a generation may be aging faster than the one that came before it. A new study of more than 164,000 people found that people born in the 1990s are biologically older than people born in the 1960s were at the very same age. The mirror says young. The blood says otherwise.
The finding, just published in Nature Medicine, breaks the basic promise of the modern world. We were told each generation gets healthier than the last, better medicine, longer lives, steady progress. Researchers measured biological age, how old a person's cells and systems actually appear from blood markers of inflammation, metabolism, and immune health, rather than the number of birthdays. Across two huge populations in the US and UK, the younger the cohort, the wider the gap between how old they were and how old their bodies had become.
The part that should land hardest is where it shows up first. Each step up in biological aging tracked with roughly an 8 percent higher risk of developing cancer before age 55. This is the era of better skincare, more gym memberships, and the longest projected lifespans ever printed on paper, and underneath it, cancers of the lung, uterus, and gut are rising in people too young to expect them.
We optimized the surface of health while something beneath it began moving backward. The face got younger. The cells got older. And the first receipt is arriving in the bodies of the people who were supposed to inherit the longest lives in human history.
Nobody yet knows or fully understands the full cause. Inflammation, processed food, a sedentary life, the chemistry of the modern world, all of it is suspected, none alone is proven. But the signal is now measurable, and it points the wrong way.
Progress promised the young would outlive the old by ever wider margins. Their blood is quietly arguing with the promise.
The average life expectancy of a new Russian recruit—from arrival at a training ground to death in a combat zone—lies somewhere between 10 days and three weeks. Once sent onto the battlefield, they survive an average of 20 to 35 minutes. @peterfrankopan https://t.co/W3UhBerdH0
The largest theft in history has already happened. The people behind it just cannot open what they stole yet.
Right now, intelligence agencies and criminal groups are quietly copying the world's encrypted data, bank records, medical files, state secrets, private messages, and storing every byte untouched. They cannot read any of it. They are collecting it anyway, because they know the key is about to be invented.
The strategy has a name, harvest now, decrypt later, and in 2026 it stopped being theory. Washington declared this the Year of Quantum Security in January, backed by the FBI, the NSA, and NIST. Canada ordered every federal agency to file a migration plan by April. Europe set its deadline for December. Governments do not impose operational deadlines on a someday problem. They do it when the clock is already running.
Here is what moved the clock. Every password, every transfer, every secret on Earth is protected by one assumption, that a certain math problem is too hard to solve. Quantum computers solve exactly that problem. For years the machine that could do it looked decades away. Then in late 2025 Google's Willow chip cracked the hardest part of building one, and in March 2026 Google's own researchers estimated that breaking the encryption behind Bitcoin might take fewer than 500,000 qubits, down from 20 million, and could run in minutes. The day this becomes real has a name, Q-Day, and the latest estimates place it between 2030 and 2033.
Now make it concrete. Roughly 6.5 million Bitcoin, about a third of every coin that will ever exist, worth close to 500 billion dollars, sit in addresses that have already exposed the very key a quantum computer needs. That includes the coins of Satoshi, the anonymous creator. On Q-Day they become, in the researchers' own word, trivially stealable. It would not look like a crash or a whale selling. It would look like half a trillion dollars of the most secure money ever built simply walking out the door. The asset designed to trust no one and no institution turns out to rest on a single unverified bet, that one math problem stays hard forever.
This is what sits beneath the entire digital world. A bank balance, a Bitcoin, a classified cable, all of it is real only because of a proof you supposedly cannot forge. Quantum breaks the proof. Everything we call secure is true only until someone finally checks, and for the first time the check is visible on the horizon. You cannot know whether your data has already been copied. You cannot know the exact day the key arrives. The trust holding up the digital age is a clock counting down to a zero no one can see.
The honest counter matters. No machine on Earth can break this encryption today, and serious cryptographers still argue the real threat is a decade or more away. The timeline is far from certain. Quantum-safe codes already exist, the migration has started, and Bitcoin can move its coins to safety before Q-Day if it acts in time. The danger is not that everything breaks tomorrow. It is that anything which must stay secret into the 2030s, a state secret, an identity, a private key, is being stolen today and is already on the clock.
The breach is not coming. It is already here, sitting in storage, perfectly encrypted, waiting for a machine that does not exist yet to read it out loud.
Research and opinion, not investment advice.
Democrats think they’re using Muslims to usher in socialism.
The truth is Muslims are using Democrats to usher in Islam.
Only 50 slots left! Come join us for the best week of Jiu-Jitsu out of the whole year!
@originpete
@jockowillink
⚡️This may be the chart that breaks the AI trade.
The market has been pricing AI like frontier intelligence stays scarce.
That assumption is getting weaker.
The U.S. still leads at the absolute frontier.
But if China can reach near-frontier capability at dramatically lower cost, the economic structure changes.
Most customers do not need the smartest model on Earth.
They need cheap, fast, reliable intelligence that can be deployed everywhere.
A 10% intelligence gap does not matter much if the second-best model is good enough and radically cheaper.
That is the danger.
The value starts moving away from raw model intelligence and toward the layers where intelligence becomes work:
coding, cyber, robotics, manufacturing, defense, finance, logistics, enterprise workflows, data centers, energy, chips, agents, and infrastructure control.
The model becomes less defensible.
The work loop becomes more defensible.
This is why the Cursor deal mattered.
If intelligence commoditizes, the valuable prize is not the chatbot.
It is the place where AI performs labor.
China does not need to beat America model-for-model to change the balance.
It only needs to industrialize adequate intelligence cheaply enough to spread through the economy, the military, cyber systems, factories, and state infrastructure.
America has the frontier gods.
China is building the factory for gods.
The market is still too obsessed with the gods.
The money will be made and lost in the factory.
⚡️The next American political realignment will form around access.
The old left-right map still matters culturally, but the material pressure underneath is changing.
The most important divide will be between people with secured claims on the existing system and people trying to enter a system that has become too expensive, too credentialized, too asset-inflated, and too politically protected.
Owners have houses, pensions, retirement accounts, business equity, professional status, low mortgage rates, zoning protection, seniority, licenses, entitlement claims, and political turnout.
Entrants have wages, rent, debt, delayed family formation, career uncertainty, inflated asset prices, and a shrinking number of ladders into ownership.
That is the conflict.
The system keeps telling entrants to work harder while the gates keep moving higher. Get a degree. The degree costs more and pays off less reliably. Get a good job. AI compresses entry-level work. Buy a house. Zoning and rates make the price insane. Start a family. Childcare and housing eat the margin. Save and invest. Asset owners already front-ran the compounding curve.
The young are angry because the old bargain now clears for fewer people.
Owners defend scarcity because scarcity protects their balance sheets. Entrants need abundance because abundance is the only way they get in. More housing. More businesses. More career ladders. More family formation. More ways to prove skill without credential debt. More access to productive assets. More permission to build.
That creates a political earthquake because both parties are full of owners.
Blue cities talk about justice while protecting housing scarcity.
Red suburbs talk about freedom while protecting zoning and retiree benefits.
Universities talk about opportunity while extracting credential rents.
Corporations talk about talent while narrowing entry ladders.
The state talks about the future while transferring resources to the past.
The hypocrisy becomes impossible to hide.
The coming revolt will not look clean. It will be messy, cross-ideological, and unstable. Some of it will look like pro-housing politics. Some will look like anti-tax politics. Some will look like crypto and hard money. Some will look like anti-university politics. Some will look like anti-gerontocracy.
The common denominator will be entry.
People want a way in.
A society can tolerate rich people when the ladder still feels open. Once the ladder feels fake, wealth becomes humiliation. Every mansion becomes accusation. Every bailout becomes theft. Every entitlement protection becomes extraction. Every zoning meeting becomes class war by paperwork.
Housing is the center of the fight because housing decides adulthood. A renter society becomes politically volatile. People who cannot own where they live do not feel like stakeholders. They feel like tenants in someone else’s civilization.
AI makes this sharper because it attacks the work ladder at the same time housing attacks the asset ladder. The old message was: sell labor, buy assets, become secure. AI weakens the labor side. Asset inflation blocks the ownership side. That is how entrants get trapped.
The owners will win the first rounds. They vote. They donate. They attend local meetings. They control institutions. They hold assets. They know how to preserve claims.
Entrants will lose patience.
That loss of patience becomes the next politics.
The final outcome will be a forced renegotiation of ownership. Housing supply, entitlement formulas, payroll taxes, credential systems, zoning, asset taxation, childcare, family formation, AI labor rules, and public-market access will all become battlegrounds.
The old order will call this extremism.
The entrants will call it a future.
That is the real cleavage: people defending the world they already own versus people trying to make a world they can enter.
Europeans and American patriots!
Tomorrow, the courts of my country, France, may decide to send me to prison for daring to say on television that “the main danger to women in France is Black African and Arab immigrant men.”
Meanwhile, my own attacker, a Tunisian migrant, is still at large.
I need your help to generate media pressure and hope to be acquitted.
They cannot silence the truth!
Thank you for your support 💪🏻🇫🇷
This AI just exposed the BIGGEST legal insider trading operation in America.
A platform called GovGreed built a seven-layer machine learning system that cross-references every stock trade disclosed by every sitting politician against the bills their committees control, the campaign donations they receive, and the companies their votes directly impact.
It scored all 540 politicians currently in Congress. And the numbers are crazy:
56% of every stock purchase made by Congress in the last 16 months was on a stock directly affected by a bill the buyer later voted on. That is 6,170 out of 11,016 total purchases.
More than HALF of all congressional stock buys are on companies whose fate that same politician is about to decide.
343 of 540 Congress members actively trade stocks while holding access to nonpublic legislative information.
That is 63.8% of the entire legislature making market bets with an informational edge that would put any hedge fund manager in prison.
The AI identified 752 active "Triple Signals" in the current Congress. A Triple Signal fires when three conditions line up at once:
The politician sits on the committee controlling a bill, they traded stock in a company affected by that bill, AND they received campaign contributions from that same industry.
Bills carrying these insider indicators pass at 5.4 TIMES the normal rate.
Now look at the individual leaderboard:
- Nancy Pelosi's estimated portfolio sits at $194 million with a Greediness score of 98.1 out of 100
- Ro Khanna made 13,231 trades across 800+ different tickers
- Michael McCaul made 32,302 trades and filed 6,670 of them late
- Thomas Suozzi filed 86.4% of his trades late with an average delay of 396 days, meaning his disclosures landed over a YEAR after he made the trade
And then there is Lisa McClain, the fourth-ranking Republican in the House. She has made 1,443 trades in three years, more than 98% of all politicians tracked.
She violated the STOCK Act twice in a single year, disclosing up to $900,000 in trades months after the legal deadline. Her husband bought up to $250,000 in Elon Musk's xAI, which quietly converted into SpaceX equity before last Friday's $2 trillion IPO.
The penalty for all of this? A $200 fine.
The number of Congress members ever prosecuted under the STOCK Act since it passed in 2012? Zero.
And the cruelest part is this:
A bill to ban congressional stock trading was introduced in January 2026. It has bipartisan support. Over 80% of American voters want it passed.
But Congress is sitting on it, because the people who would have to vote yes are the same people making millions from the system staying exactly the way it is.
They write the insider trading laws, they exempt themselves from enforcement, they trade on the information those laws generate, and when they get caught, they pay a fine that is basically nothing.
The AI didn't discover anything Congress was hiding. It just organized what was already public into a pattern so obvious that nobody can pretend it isn't there anymore.
The next war won't be won by armies, navies or air forces alone.
It'll be won by the country whose 19 year olds can code, whose factories can build drones in weeks not years, and whose grid stays on when someone tries to switch it off.
Industry. Society. Economy. That's the fight now.
We're not ready. And we're not being honest about what getting ready will cost.
Our statement on the UK government’s demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the country be scanned, on the presumption of nudity, using a dystopian combination of age verification and content scanning. This proposal will not safeguard children. It endangers us all.
https://t.co/VdWe9uhi8p
I’m excited to announce my memoir, Out of the Shadows, will be published by HarperCollins in North America on October 13, 2026. In the book, I break my silence to reveal everything I legally can about my investigations of UAP and non-human intelligent life on behalf of the U.S Government and the profound impact my work had on me and my family. We are at a turning point in human history and I am proud to play a role in opening the public’s eyes to the truth and bringing about long overdue disclosure.
When Navy seaman Douglas Hegdahl fell overboard into the Gulf of Tonkin in 1967, North Vietnamese forces pulled him out of the water and dragged him to the most feared prison of the Vietnam War — the Hanoi Hilton.
He was young. He was low-ranking. And the moment he arrived, he made a decision his captors never saw coming.
He would become the dumbest man in the room.
Hegdahl shuffled around the prison yard with a blank expression and a dopey grin, tripping over things, asking confused questions, acting like a man who couldn't tie his own shoelaces. His guards laughed at him. They gave him a nickname — "The Incredibly Stupid One" — and, crucially, they gave him something no other prisoner had: the freedom to wander.
They thought he was harmless.
He was anything but.
While his captors looked away, Hegdahl quietly dropped dirt and stones into enemy truck fuel tanks, sabotaging their operations one engine at a time. But that wasn't his real mission. His real mission was invisible.
Every day, Hegdahl watched. He listened. He memorized — the name of every American prisoner held in that camp, their capture date, the conditions they endured, the torture they suffered. Information the North Vietnamese deliberately hid from the outside world. Information that hundreds of families back home were desperate for.
And he found a way to make sure he'd never forget a single detail.
He set every name, every date, every fact — to the tune of "Old MacDonald Had a Farm." He sang it silently in his head, day after day, in a prison cell, surrounded by men who had no idea what the young fool was quietly carrying.
In 1969, the North Vietnamese released him early as a propaganda gesture. They wanted to show the world their generosity. They thought they were setting a harmless simpleton free.
Instead, they handed the United States one of the most valuable intelligence assets of the entire war.
The moment Hegdahl reached American soil, he delivered everything — name after name after name. Over 250 prisoners accounted for. Families who had waited years in agonizing silence finally learned their sons, husbands, and fathers were alive.
Senior military officers later said his information was so detailed, so precise, that it fundamentally changed how America understood the POW situation in Vietnam.
Douglas Hegdahl never fired a weapon. He never led a charge. He won his battle by making the enemy believe he was nothing — and quietly becoming everything.
The most dangerous person in the room isn't always the loudest. Sometimes, it's the one they forgot to watch.
⚡️Cable news is regime narration at industrial scale.
Its deepest function is not informing people.
Its function is telling people which version of reality they are supposed to emotionally inhabit.
Cable news takes the infinite chaos of reality and turns it into a managed arena: approved conflicts, approved villains, approved heroes, approved emergencies, approved language, approved experts, approved outrage cycles.
It does not need to fabricate everything. It controls reality more efficiently by choosing what matters, what repeats, what disappears, what gets mocked, what gets moralized, and what gets framed as dangerous.
The power is in selection.
One story becomes national trauma.
Another story vanishes.
One scandal becomes existential.
Another gets processed as complexity.
One group gets humanized.
Another gets abstracted into threat.
One policy gets called “reform.”
Another gets called “extremism.”
That is agenda power.
Cable news is also emotional conditioning. It trains the viewer’s nervous system. Anger at 7. Fear at 8. Certainty at 9. Relief during commercials. Repeat tomorrow. The audience does not simply receive information. It receives a rhythm of agitation and belonging.
The viewer learns who “we” are.
The viewer learns who “they” are.
The viewer learns which facts feel safe.
The viewer learns which questions feel forbidden.
That is why people can watch hours of “news” and become less capable of seeing reality clearly. They are not being given a map. They are being placed inside a mood.
The deeper layer is institutional self-defense. Cable news protects the legitimacy of the system that feeds it: parties, agencies, corporations, donors, advertisers, intelligence sources, regulators, banks, wars, markets, universities, NGOs, courts, credentialed experts. It can criticize individual actors all day while preserving the frame that the official arena remains the only serious arena.
That is the trick.
It permits conflict while policing the boundary of interpretation.
Left-wing cable news and right-wing cable news differ in tribe, tone, moral language, and target selection. The underlying machine is similar: capture attention, simplify reality, reinforce identity, create dependency, convert anxiety into loyalty.
The real enemy of cable news is not “misinformation.” The real enemy is independent pattern recognition.
A person who can track incentives, read primary sources, compare omissions, follow money, understand power, and hold multiple frames without needing a host to narrate them becomes harder to manage.
That person stops being an audience member.
Final compression: cable news is a ritual chamber where institutions convert events into controlled emotion.
It calls itself information, but its real product is narrative obedience.
⚡️A civilization that delegitimizes protective force eventually teaches predators that only victims are restrained.
Modern liberal societies became so afraid of unjust force that they started losing the ability to distinguish predatory force from protective force.
That distinction is everything.
Predatory force destroys order.
Protective force creates the conditions where mercy, tolerance, rights, and pluralism can exist.
The West forgot that morality needs a shield.
A woman walking safely at night is not protected by abstract values alone.
She is protected by a chain of credible consequences: fathers, brothers, neighbors, police, courts, prisons, borders, armed defense, deportation when applicable, social stigma, and a wider male culture that treats predation as something to be crushed rather than explained away.
When that chain weakens, civilization does not become kinder.
It becomes prey.
Violent men are ultimately stopped by men and institutions willing to use force lawfully and decisively.
Paper rights mean nothing without enforcement. Compassion means nothing without boundaries. Inclusion means nothing if it imports or tolerates people who reject the norms that make inclusion possible.
The West’s sickness is not empathy.
Empathy is good when it remains ordered.
The sickness is empathy hijacked by status fear.
Elites became more afraid of appearing harsh than of letting ordinary people suffer. They learned to sympathize upward with abstract offender categories while ignoring the concrete victim in front of them.
That is moral inversion.
The civilization starts protecting its own self-image instead of its people.
The darker truth: once protective masculinity is shamed, only criminal masculinity remains confident. Good men become hesitant, bureaucratized, afraid of accusation, afraid of escalation, afraid of institutional punishment. Bad men read the hesitation instantly. Predators are excellent students of weakness.
A healthy society disciplines male force, gives it lawful channels, binds it to protection, and punishes its corruption.
A sick society tries to abolish it rhetorically, then acts shocked when force reappears in criminal form.
Bottom line:
Order is not created by niceness.
Order is created when decent people retain enough sanctioned strength to make predation costly.
The West’s failure is that it confused restraining protectors with restraining violence.
This is Paris, France tonight. Import the third world, become the third world.
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.7M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.2M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.7M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
111M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.2M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
87.9M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
81.7M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
73.2M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
70.2M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
63M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60.9M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers