Shoutout to @USANewsTweets for the profile on what we are building with @LayoffAI and the $LAYOFF movement
Just getting started.
https://t.co/4hdj0vE1qX
I’m getting a lot of “why not just buy NEET instead of Layoff.”
Look, I love @neet_sol
$LAYOFF is very different.
NEET is more for “hey I’m not going to get a job I’m just going to buy this coin ha ha”
LAYOFF is a community built as a hedge on the inevitable, that AI is overtaking the workforce and we want to take that power back.
Building a community from scratch is very difficult in this market, but I believe in the community we’ve built to hold the floor AND the 100s of daily articles and 200k+ impression tweets about layoffs.
An avalanche is coming. We will be prepared.
9voQQTTdfbqfXwc9rZAdJEeXXjUWjHnB4wkShMT8pump
https://t.co/NqZA2Fmxdf
Meta just showed every CEO in America exactly how to replace their workforce.
They laid off 700 people this week. Plan 15,000 more ASAP. Now, leaked internal documents reveal what comes next.
Meta now requires 65% of its engineers to write 75% or more of their code using AI by mid-2026. Their Scalable Machine Learning org has a target of 50-80% AI-assisted code. Across Messenger, WhatsApp, and Facebook, 55% of all code changes must be “Agent-Assisted.” 80% of mid-to-senior engineers must adopt AI tools like DevMate and Google Gemini.
Starting this year, every Meta employee is graded on “AI-driven impact” in their performance reviews. It is now a core expectation. If you don’t use AI, you don’t advance. Meta is the first major tech company to formally tie promotions to AI adoption.
They built an internal game called “Level Up” that rewards employees with badges for hitting AI milestones. They rolled out an “AI Performance Assistant” to help write reviews. They are rebranding engineers as “AI Builders” and reorganizing teams into small “AI-native pods.” Zuckerberg said projects that once required large teams can now be handled by one “very talented” person.
Read that again. One person replacing a team.
Here’s why this matters beyond Meta.
Every CEO in tech watches what Meta does. When Meta cut 11,000 in 2022, the rest of tech followed within months. When Meta tied performance reviews to AI, KPMG did the same thing within weeks. Accenture just told senior staff that AI tool usage will determine who gets promoted to leadership. The playbook is spreading.
The pattern is clear. Step one: mandate AI adoption internally. Step two: measure how much output AI handles. Step three: when AI handles 75% of the work, you need 75% fewer people to do it. Step four: cut.
Block already did this. Jack Dorsey cut 40% of the company and told shareholders “intelligence tools have changed what it means to build and run a company.” The stock surged 24%.
Wall Street doesn’t reward hiring. It rewards headcount reduction. Every earnings call where a CEO says “AI is making us more productive” is a preview of the next layoff announcement.
Meta is spending $135 billion on AI this year. They are simultaneously cutting thousands of workers. Those two facts are not in tension. They are the same strategy.
Quem é o CEO da Decred? Ninguém. Quem é a fundação por trás? Nenhuma. Quem decide o futuro do protocolo? Os stakeholders.
A Decred é provavelmente o projeto mais próximo do ideal cypherpunk original: código aberto, sem líderes centralizados, governado pela comunidade. #DCR
Decentralization has become a comfort word.
Used everywhere, questioned almost nowhere.
Think about a workplace,everyone is in the meeting.
Everyone can speak, and everyone feels included.
But when it’s time to decide, a few voices carry the outcome.
That’s how a lot of systems operate.They look open, they feel participatory.
But influence?
That’s concentrated.
So the real question is: Are users shaping outcomes, or just sitting in the room while decisions get made?
#decredaf #decredproject #decentralization
Crypto didn’t stall because the tech isn’t good enough,
It stalled because control never really changed hands.
Different names Same structure.
A few voices shape the direction.
Everyone else adjusts to it.
So we keep calling it decentralization,
but the experience feels familiar.
Until users can actually push back ,
not just participate
this doesn’t get solved.
Most people say they want decentralization.
But when it comes to actual control,
upgrades, funding or decisions.
How much influence should users really have?
Full control?
Or just a voice?
Decred é a escolha de quem busca autonomia de verdade.
Aqui, você não depende de terceiros para decidir o futuro da rede. Governança na mão dos usuários, foco em segurança e privacidade.
Soberania sobre poder mandar no próprio dinheiro!
#DCR
Please enjoy the finest sweet called Decred! 🥮
Much like its robust blockchain, this dessert is built on a perfect hybrid of textures.
It’s a decentralized indulgence where your taste buds hold the ultimate voting power.
#DCR $DCR #Decred#デクレ
Soon Decred will be too big to ignore for the most popular US based CEXs. Then all bets are off! At the moment US citizens need to use a VPN in order to buy Decred with fiat (yes its that bad). And still it pumps that hard.
There are so much potential triggers coming for Decred. We are not bullish enough. We think we are, but we are not.