TRON is home to a tokenized private credit fund.
Issued by Securitize, Hamilton Lane’s Senior Credit Opportunities Fund (“HLSCOPE”), expands access to private markets through a high-speed, secure blockchain that works nonstop around the world.
Here’s how to get a free lifetime subscription to @HashboardApp and 10,000TH/s for a shot at a solo Bitcoin block:
-Download the Hashboard app
-Configure the completely customizable dashboard the way you think looks best
-Post a screenshot in the comments
-Repost this
We’ll randomly pick a miner who gets free Hashboard for life, and 10,000TH/s pointed to their BTC pool of choice for three hours. ⛏️
🍎 https://t.co/pVJVr7yyJF
🤖 https://t.co/A3mSLOBaE9
Russia's Largest Securities Exchange to Launch SOL, XRP, TRX and BNB Crypto Indexes
The Moscow Exchange will begin publishing four crypto indexes tracking SOL, XRP, TRX and BNB from May 13, using pricing data from Binance (50%), Bybit (20%), OKX (15%) and Bitget (15%).
Existing indexes including MOEXBTC and MOEXETH will also update every 15 seconds during trading sessions. The exchange plans to expand its crypto benchmarks to 10, with related instruments limited to professional investors.
The irony is unreal. The entire $WLFI community vilified Justin Sun for months. Every dip was his fault. Every sell rumour pointed at him. Maybe rightfully, maybe not.
But here's what's undeniable now: the team ghosted us for months. Borrowed $75M against our token on a platform their CTO co-founded. Used investors as exit liquidity. Brought it billions into circulation. Minted $25M in fresh stablecoins the same day they claimed repayment. And the official response to every hard question? "FUD."
And now the one person actually fighting for holder rights in a federal courtroom is the guy we all hated.
Say what you want about Justin Sun. He just filed a lawsuit demanding the answers we've been begging for. That makes him the unlikely hero of every $WLFI investor - whether our tokens moon or go to zero.
Because when your biggest investor has to sue you for transparency, the problem isn't the investor. @justinsuntron@worldlibertyfi
Impartial observer here. Let me line this up:
@worldlibertyfi@ZachWitkoff:
• Promised unlock clarity → ghosted 5 months
• Promised governance → 9 insider wallets, 59% of votes
• Promised transparency → $75M self-loan hidden until CoinDesk found it
• Promised repayment → minted $25M fresh USD1 same day
• Promised accountability → froze $107M of their biggest investor's tokens
@justinsuntron:
• Said he'd take legal action → filed in federal court today
One calls it FUD. The other called a lawyer.
🤷🏽♂️
Hey scammer 🖕 bastard 🖕🤡 @ZachWitkoff@worldlibertyfi the best SCAMMERS of the world 🖕
Have you seen the latest proposal from this team of scammers? We have to accept a 2-year lockout on our presale and then a 2-year vesting period. If we refuse or abstain, our presale tokens will be locked indefinitely (forever). Is this DEFi? This is a scam, and @justinsuntron is fighting these scammers for us too. Thank you so much @justinsuntron@gothburz is satirizing you clowns, he stated that he is not part of the team . He is exposing your scam
Tron Inc. (NASDAQ: TRON) acquired 153,089 TRX tokens today at an average price of $0.3266 further increasing its TRX treasury holdings to more than 691.9 million TRX in total. The company aims to further grow its Tron DAT holdings to enhance long term shareholder value. For live update on the designated on-chain TRX treasury wallet for Tron Inc., please refer to: https://t.co/UYZgaRvn97.
This Is World Tyranny, Not World Liberty Financial — Here's Why
This proposal has been packaged as a "governance alignment signal" and a "long-term commitment," but strip away the packaging and what you have is one of the most absurd governance scams I have ever seen. Let me break it down.
I. Vote Against and Get Punished — Classic Coercion Tactic
This is not a legitimate voting exercise, not even close. The design of this proposal is a logical trap: anyone who votes against it has their tokens locked indefinitely with no unlock path whatsoever.
In other words, if you oppose this proposal, you get punished. This is not voting. This is coercion. What kind of democratic process rewards agreement and imprisons dissent?
II. Voters Have Been Selectively Frozen Out
I personally hold approximately 4% of the voting power, yet my tokens have been frozen and I am forced out of this voting process.
I am not alone.
A large number of holders with significant voting rights are in the same position. Meanwhile, the team controls the power to freeze tokens — they decide who can vote and who cannot. What does this mean? It means the outcome was determined before the vote even began.
This is not a governance vote. This is a performance where the police have already barricaded the doors of parliament and only let their own people inside to raise their hands. The voter pool has been purged. Only yes votes remain.
The result of such a vote carries no binding force whatsoever.
III. All Actual Power Has Been Seized by Anonymous Actors
The actual control over the WLFI smart contracts lies in the hands of a 3/5 anonymous multisig and a single anonymous guardian EOA has the power to blacklist addresses holding WLFI.
Let me emphasize — anonymous.
This anonymous multisig can override any vote result and execute any operation directly at the contract level. The so-called governance proposals, on-chain votes, and community discussions are nothing but theater. Real power has never been yielded to anyone but themselves and it’s laughable that they try these tricks to fool the community.
The bottom line is this, the power sits with anonymous wallet addresses whose owners nobody knows or can verify. This is not decentralized governance. This is dictatorship wearing the mask of a DAO.
IV. Voters Must Identify Themselves, but the Rulers Are Anonymous — Worse Than Tyranny
Here is the most ironic part: WLFI requires every participating voter to complete identity verification, electronically sign acknowledgements, and meet compliance eligibility requirements. You want to exercise your rights? Show your face first.
But who are the guardian and multisig signers who hold the power of life and death over the contract? Nobody was told and there is absolutely no transparency. While the governed must identify themselves, the governors with absolute power are anonymous. Your voters must register, submit to scrutiny, and be vetted and dictated how to vote— while your dictators won't even show their faces.
V. A Naked Violation of Property Rights Worth Billions of Dollars
Let us not forget the real stakes of this proposal: this is not some trivial parameter adjustment or protocol upgrade. This vote seeks to decide the unlock schedule for billions of dollars in assets, the reallocation of governance and vesting rights, and most extreme of all, the permanent destruction of billions of tokens. This is a naked expropriation of holders' property rights.
In an environment where voting against the proposal is punished, where large numbers of holders have been frozen out of voting, and where actual control rests with anonymous wallets, using this sham vote to decide the fate of billions of dollars in assets?
This is not governance. This is a sham and flies in the face of what this protocol was meant to be. No society governed by the rule of law would permit this. In traditional financial markets, any asset disposition of this scale would require rigorous regulatory review, independent board approval, and minority shareholder protections.
Here, a few anonymous wallets get to decide everything. The permanent burning of tokens means holders' property is irreversibly destroyed, no compensation, no recourse, no due process. This has gone far beyond the realm of so-called "decentralized governance." This is a systematic violation of property rights.
Conclusion
I repeat that this proposal is not governance. It is an exercise of power by the selected few who are carefully engineering a further power consolidation and property expropriation operation.
Dissenters are punished for voting no. Opponents are frozen out. Actual control lies with anonymous wallets. Those who exercise their rights must prove their identity while the fate of billions of dollars in assets is decided by a sham vote.
This is not what decentralized finance was meant to be, results produced under these sorts of conditions carry no legitimacy, should not have binding force, and should not be recognized.
I call on all WLFI holders to see this proposal for what it truly is, to voice their opposition across all public channels, and to reserve all legal rights of recourse.
While Bitcoin debates whether to freeze vulnerable coins and Ethereum forms research committees, TRON is building.
Today I'm announcing that TRON is officially launching its post-quantum upgrade initiative. TRON will be the first major public blockchain to deploy NIST-standardized post-quantum cryptographic signatures on mainnet.
Quantum security shouldn't be a debate. It should be a feature. We will ensure that no TRON user ever loses their assets to quantum threats.
Technical roadmap coming soon.
I am calling on World Liberty Financial @worldlibertyfi to publicly disclose who controls the single guardian EOA and the 3/5 multisig that govern the WLFI smart contract.
Every investor has the right to know who holds the power to freeze their assets.
Here is what on-chain records show: A single guardian EOA — which also sits on the multisig — blacklisted my wallet. That same address is the sole owner of a second guardian Safe with a threshold of 1.
This means one person — one single individual — has the unilateral power to freeze any token holder's assets. Seizing those assets requires a 3-of-5 multisig vote, but freezing requires only one signature.
Who is that person? The community deserves an answer.
Let me be clear about what this structure means: community governance and voting are meaningless. Every proposal, every vote, every claim of decentralized decision-making is theater. Real power — the power to freeze, to move funds, to control the protocol — sits with one anonymous EOA and a 3-of-5 multisig that answers to no one. The entire governance framework has been hollowed out from the inside.
A project that claims to stand for decentralization and financial freedom cannot concentrate this level of power in a single anonymous address. If the WLFI team has nothing to hide, they should have no difficulty identifying who controls these keys.