@HansMahncke Pele Broberg, leader of the second largest Greenland Party Naleraq, says Greenland shouldn't let Danish panic dictate its future. If the U.S. wants a deal, we negotiate directly—as equals.
The goal isn't annexation; it’s independence and "Free Association" with the US . 🇬🇱🇺🇸
What has been largely absent from the media’s narratives about Greenland is the fact that, from 1966 to 1991, Danish authorities ran a systematic program to suppress Greenland’s birth rate by effectively sterilizing thousands of women and girls, some as young as 12, during routine health appointments, without their knowledge or consent.
In light of that history, Denmark has no moral standing to lecture anyone about Greenland, its people, or its future, and it certainly does not deserve compensation of any kind for relinquishing control. This was the conduct of a colonial power engaged in population control, extending well into the modern era. Denmark should disappear from the discussion entirely and leave Greenland and its people free of any further interference or pretense.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex This 10-15% gap in private sector share creates a fundamentally different engine for growth, prioritizing market-led innovation over state-managed social infrastructure.
Result: the poorest US state is richer than most rich European countries.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex The biggest explanation for the difference in economic dynamism between the US and Europe is the sheer scale of the private sector’s role in high-value services. While the US private sector drives over 60% of GDP, the European average sits closer to 50%.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex This 10-15% gap in private sector share creates a fundamentally different engine for growth, prioritizing market-led innovation over state-managed social infrastructure.
Result: the poorest US state is richer than most rich European countries.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex The biggest explanation for the difference in economic dynamism between the US and Europe is the sheer scale of the private sector’s role in high-value services. While the US private sector drives over 60% of GDP, the European average sits closer to 50%.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex This 10-15% gap in private sector share creates a fundamentally different engine for growth, prioritizing market-led innovation over state-managed social infrastructure.
Result: the poorest US state is richer than most rich European countries.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex The biggest explanation for the difference in economic dynamism between the US and Europe is the sheer scale of the private sector’s role in high-value services. While the US private sector drives over 60% of GDP, the European average sits closer to 50%.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex This 10-15% gap in private sector share creates a fundamentally different engine for growth, prioritizing market-led innovation over state-managed social infrastructure.
Result: the poorest US state is richer than most rich European countries.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex The biggest explanation for the difference in economic dynamism between the US and Europe is the sheer scale of the private sector’s role in high-value services. While the US private sector drives over 60% of GDP, the European average sits closer to 50%.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex This 10-15% gap in private sector share creates a fundamentally different engine for growth, prioritizing market-led innovation over state-managed social infrastructure.
Result: the poorest US state is richer than most rich European countries.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex The biggest explanation for the difference in economic dynamism between the US and Europe is the sheer scale of the private sector’s role in high-value services. While the US private sector drives over 60% of GDP, the European average sits closer to 50%.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex This 10-15% gap in private sector share creates a fundamentally different engine for growth, prioritizing market-led innovation over state-managed social infrastructure.
Result: the poorest US state is richer than most rich European countries.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex The biggest explanation for the difference in economic dynamism between the US and Europe is the sheer scale of the private sector’s role in high-value services. While the US private sector drives over 60% of GDP, the European average sits closer to 50%.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex This 10-15% gap in private sector share creates a fundamentally different engine for growth, prioritizing market-led innovation over state-managed social infrastructure.
Result: the poorest US state is richer than most rich European countries.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex The biggest explanation for the difference in economic dynamism between the US and Europe is the sheer scale of the private sector’s role in high-value services. While the US private sector drives over 60% of GDP, the European average sits closer to 50%.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex This 10-15% gap in private sector share creates a fundamentally different engine for growth, prioritizing market-led innovation over state-managed social infrastructure.
Result: the poorest US state is richer than most rich European countries.
@irrespolong@spectatorindex The biggest explanation for the difference in economic dynamism between the US and Europe is the sheer scale of the private sector’s role in high-value services. While the US private sector drives over 60% of GDP, the European average sits closer to 50%.