@MarinaGlynn@LawyerYouKnow That’s EXACTLY my point. He KNEW he was pointing the gun at HG. He knew to NEVER point a gun at someone- it’s an on set rule that he was constantly breaking - not just once but throughout the filming. Even loaded with blanks NEVER point the gun at someone. He pointed AND FIRED!
@LawSelfDefense@StarowNiklas Wooa! You’re a lawyer. You KNOW it does not need to be malicious. Why would you say that? Are you PRETENDING to not understand? I agree that there’s an argument that it was not exculpatory but quit the bullshit pretending to not know WHY it was dismissed.
@BarelyStated@MarinaGlynn@LawyerYouKnow If it’s your garage and the mechanic works for you and you are responsible for everything that happens in your garage and allow a culture of non-compliance. You’re told never to drive a car the wrong way up a one-way-street because it’s dangerous but you do it anyway…
@MarinaGlynn@LawyerYouKnow I think you’re misunderstanding the term ‘accident’. If i drink a bottle of whisky then drive my car, accidentally hitting a child, am I culpable? I didn’t hit them on purpose. I am horrified at what happened and would never hurt a fly. Or am I to blame for my reckless behaviour?
@Lollipoptwist@DoctorTurtleboy Defence focussed so much on their alternate theory that jurors may be subconsciously doubting the veracity of that as opposed to simply looking at ‘did she hit him.’
@7uu7aa@Free_Karen_Read No. But it’s a good idea to e.g. begin with “let’s take a look at the evidence for and against whether or not he was killed by being hit with a car.” Once they all have their say, they should conclude he was or was not. Then either an immediate verdict or continue