The next founder you learn from probably won't live in your city.
That's the point.
Applications open until September 18th, 25 spots available: https://t.co/tVvwZlFnwk
StableAML just landed in Blockchain (Juvinski, Li, Brini). Uncomfortable bit: as ZK and bridges chew the graph, simpler models beat graph nets on USDT/USDC. Stablecoins aren't the side rail. They're the last window.
https://t.co/Q0YnW73RjF
@FloridaFunders You’re absolutely right. In compliance, the number of Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) has doubled in the past year. Crime has evolved from bot-driven to agentic, so the AML/CFT should also adapt accordingly!
Compliance has always been expensive, manual, and full of information silos. That’s why it has historically attracted significant investment in tools.
But now, with AI and blockchain, investor interest has clearly accelerated.
Why it matters NOW:
LatAm already moves $324B+/year in stablecoins — on a public ledger.
Balances, counterparties, cash flow: exposed to anyone.
From trade secrecy to physical safety, privacy is a latent need.
Measuring on-chain privacy is a paradox.
These protocols exist to hide the numbers.
So we built a proxy — and the projection surprised us. 🧵
EN/PT
https://t.co/uWRwk46DDR
Not All Blockchain Privacy Protocols Carry the Same Compliance Risk
When many compliance teams hear "privacy protocol," they often place everything in the same bucket. In reality, blockchain privacy technologies span a wide spectrum
Stablecoins have become core financial infrastructure across LATAM.
A new report from @raincards puts numbers to it: $1.5 trillion in onchain transactions across the region between 2022 and 2025, with 57.7 million people already holding digital dollars.
48 horas vs 400 milissegundos.
Esse é o duelo do compliance em blockchain hoje.
48 horas: tempo médio que um analista leva para montar e protocolar um relatório de atividade suspeita. Não por incompetência. 99% do trabalho é coleta de dados em ferramentas fragmentadas.
400 milissegundos: tempo em que um exploit ou uma lavagem se torna permanente no blockchain.
Quando o relatório fica pronto, o dinheiro já passou por 3 redes e saiu por uma exchange do outro lado do mundo. Há dois dias.
O modelo "humano no circuito" não é lento. É estruturalmente impossível nessa velocidade.
A pergunta que todo emissor de stablecoin deveria fazer ao seu fornecedor de compliance: "você consegue agir ANTES da transação confirmar, ou só me conta o que aconteceu depois?"
Se a resposta for a segunda, você tem um historiador. Não uma defesa.