Jva O.E.

🇻🇦

[Dkay @Deekay_0000]

Two sensitive [autistic] young men. @jva20_

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@Deekay_0000 So true.

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @muxsin2003]

Arsenal “biggest club in London” gimmick with less European pedigree than “Crystal Palace”

[Chelsea FC @ChelseaFC]

Come and visit London’s Home of Trophies. 🏆

Book your Stadium Tour at Stamford Bridge now. ⭐️⭐Come and visit London’s Home of Trophies. 🏆

Book your Stadium Tour at Stamford Bridge now. ⭐️⭐Come and visit London’s Home of Trophies. 🏆

Book your Stadium Tour at Stamford Bridge now. ⭐️⭐Come and visit London’s Home of Trophies. 🏆

Book your Stadium Tour at Stamford Bridge now. ⭐️⭐Come and visit London’s Home of Trophies. 🏆

Book your Stadium Tour at Stamford Bridge now. ⭐️⭐Come and visit London’s Home of Trophies. 🏆

Book your Stadium Tour at Stamford Bridge now. ⭐️⭐️

[Santana O.E. @3Santana_]

There is nothing my soul desires more than detachment from the world.

[Santana O.E. @3Santana_]

“Ah, my Redeemer, Thou hast shed all Thy Blood. Thou hast given Thy life to save my soul, and I have so often lost it, hoping in Thy mercy; and in this way have I so often made use of Thy great goodness, for what? to offend Thee more”

~ St Alphonsus Liguori

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@EdwinNunez1646 @kyotoisreformed @ScholasticsFan @RyanHurst171 Calvin isnt exactly the most precise writer

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@Degenwillape @bonesforsales This isnt a uniquely “romanist” interpretation, you realise the Fathers and even your own authors held to this?

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@iansenius @NatSchreffler @JohnXI35 How do you square that with Article XXII?

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@mugjudge @LukasNectarios The ones pertaining to his temporal power, although I could make a case that it’s virtually contained in Scripture and Tradition and that is congruent with the principles therein

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@mugjudge @LukasNectarios This isn’t a serious argument, most of the propositions could be dated as far back as Pope St. Gelasius

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@DylanIsaacFern @JustinusRomanus Just a few things; “ratio credendi” is being used very loosely, obviously the reasons for believing are not the motives of credibility but the First Truth revealing and secondly there are some errors with the citations given but alas the substance remains pure.

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@DylanIsaacFern @JustinusRomanus https://t.co/fwpEvcEN0E

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

We should not fret at the term “Romanist” levied by the enemies of the Church, for to be Romanist is to be Christian.

[The Other Paul @TheOtherPaul2]

Nope, I and other Prots having been using it for years now as a neutral term to level the linguistic playing field, and we've made this clear repeatedly, such that even other Roman apologists are chill with it (e.g. @DoorDashThomist). Unfortunately, a dictionary on global English use doesn't have a sub-section for Twitter e-apologetics lingo.

Billionth time, give the evidence. Primary sources, historical analysis; not assertions.

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@hayes_hopper @JustinusRomanus @Thomisticae https://t.co/tQw2RhW9GR

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@hayes_hopper @JustinusRomanus @Thomisticae Numerous responses to Saepius Officio have been offered by our divines. One example here

[Lefantome O. E. @Lafantom3]

The paper addressing forced misrepresentations of the faith by various eager are here addressed.
https://t.co/twV9xuSsI0

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@Lafantom3 @mattjhedges11 @DoorDashThomist https://t.co/VyUUwSgaRK

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@sincead33 @Lafantom3 Concerning the paper, it has now been launched. Let us know your thoughts.

https://t.co/VJbqGZcUT1

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@sincead33 @Lafantom3 Concerning the paper, it has now been launched. Let us know your thoughts.

https://t.co/VJbqGZcUT1

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@sincead33 @Lafantom3 We are primarily treating the issue of the inability for Protestants to elicit an act of divine faith with respect to the canon but we intend to treat other tertiary related issues such as the formal motive of faith, distinction between inspiration/revelation/infallibility etc.

[Jva O.E. @jva20_]

@ChrisRojas4081 @sincead33 @CristobalArroz Not as a rule, but with regards to its ontology and dignity